Telescope Reviews: Re: Fujichrome Sensia 200 or 400?

You are not logged in. [Login]

Entrance · Main Index · Search · New user · Who's Online
FAQ · Calendar

Astrophotography and Sketching >> Film Astrophotography

Nebhunter
Pooh-Bah

Reged: 10/04/03
Posts: 1010
Loc: Frostbite Falls

Re: Fujichrome Sensia 200 or 400?
07/05/08 05:56 PM

I've used 400 Sensia since they quit making Provia F, and found it to be OK. Red response seems to be less than the F, but OK. If you can get Kodak E200 - use it. It is the standard right now. Yes you will burn up some film to get started, but I would go with whatever is cheaper or will get you going. You could start with the 200, and then progress to the E200 later.

--------------------
Handle me with Care - The Traveling Wilburys.

TEC 140 "Katyusha" - Tec field flattener. Equinox 80 -
Atlas EQ6 SynScan GPS ADM conversion. ST-4 guider.

PENTAX 67 - 400 EDif - 300 - 200 - 135 - 90 lenses.
OM-1 300 Tamron - Konica 35-100 Varifocal STI Pro Stiletto.

http://nightfly.zoomshare.com/

Post Extras

Print Post

Remind Me!

Notify Moderator

Entire thread
Subject	Posted by	Posted on
Fujichrome Sensia 200 or 400?	nimthor	07/05/08 10:22 AM
Re: Fujichrome Sensia 200 or 400?	Nebhunter	07/05/08 05:56 PM
Re: Fujichrome Sensia 200 or 400?	Nightfly	07/05/08 08:53 PM
Re: Fujichrome Sensia 200 or 400?	Jerry J	07/06/08 11:58 PM
Re: Fujichrome Sensia 200 or 400?	jrw11	07/05/08 11:48 AM

Extra information

0 registered and 1 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator: Suk Lee, Charlie Hein, knuklhdastnmr, ClownFish

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 366

Jump to

Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics