Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User
David Knisely
Postmaster
   
Reged: 04/19/04
Posts: 6778
Loc: Beatrice, Nebraska
|
Re: Eyepiece v. Eyepiece/Barlow and PN cs's
07/08/08 07:12 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Several of my friends have commented at different times that at a similar magnification an eyepiece and barlow combo will show some Planetary's central stars much more clearly than an eyepiece by itself. I've seen this myself too a couple of years back, switching back and forth enough to say it was not atmospheric.
What makes this apparently work, does the barlow, by making an effectively longer FL system, reduce coma and therefore produce tighter star images, or what? Have others seen this?
Steven
Barlows have little if any effect on coma. They do help reduce the off-axis astigmatism which some eyepieces generate when used in the steep light cones of short f/ratio instruments, but otherwise, they don't do anything for coma. On-axis, I have never really noticed much of a difference between Barlowed and unBarlowed systems as far as central stars are concerned, but I generally work at f/10, so the light cones are pretty shallow to begin with. Clear skies to you.
-------------------- David W. Knisely
Hyde Memorial Observatory
http://www.hydeobservatory.info
|
|
3 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: matt, Olivier Biot
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Rating:
Thread views: 354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|