Return to the Cloudy Nights Telescope Reviews home page

Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums

Privacy Policy | Please read our Terms of Service | Signup and Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User

Equipment Discussions >> Binoculars

Tony Flanders
Carpal Tunnel


Reged: 05/18/06
Posts: 2203
Loc: Cambridge, MA, USA
Re: It was very disappointing
      08/05/08 08:48 AM

Quote:

M4 is a VERY difficult object, even in the best of conditions for an experienced observer.




No, I certainly wouldn't go that far. At latitude 42N, in dark skies, when the transparency is decent, M4 sticks out like a sore thumb through my 7x35 binoculars. I can't imagine even the rankest beginner having any trouble whatsoever in seeing it. In fact, its large size makes it one of the most prominent globular clusters through small binoculars when conditions are good. M5 or M13 can be mistaken for stars, but never M4.

But as other people have said, this object is quite sensitive to light pollution, northerly latitude, and haze. At this time of year, I'd finger haze as the most likely culprit for somebody having trouble seeing M4 from rural skies south of latitude 45N.

--------------------
Tony Flanders

eyeglasses
6x15 and 8x32 monoculars
8x25, 7x35, 10x30 IS, 10x50, and 15x70 binoculars
70mm and 100mm achromatic refractors
4.5", 7", and 12.5" Dobs

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator

Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* It was very disappointing Obx 08/04/08 10:27 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing BobinKy   08/04/08 10:52 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Obx   08/04/08 11:07 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing edcannon   08/05/08 03:40 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing PhilH   08/05/08 07:13 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing BobinKy   08/04/08 12:22 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Mary   08/04/08 01:01 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Tony Flanders   08/05/08 08:48 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Dave Mitsky   08/05/08 09:25 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Obx   08/04/08 04:52 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Protheus   08/04/08 05:10 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing F.Meiresonne   08/04/08 05:35 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing CESDewar   08/05/08 12:51 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing RichD   08/05/08 03:07 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing RichD   08/04/08 05:33 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing RichD   08/04/08 10:38 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Rich N   08/04/08 10:47 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing EdZModerator   08/04/08 12:14 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Rich N   08/05/08 10:16 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Special Ed   08/05/08 10:13 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing PhilH   08/05/08 01:54 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing EdZModerator   08/05/08 03:15 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Charles Laird   08/06/08 01:02 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Tony Flanders   08/05/08 08:42 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Dave Mitsky   08/05/08 09:33 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing milt   08/06/08 06:47 PM
. * Re: It was very disappointing RichD   08/04/08 10:42 AM
. * Re: It was very disappointing Mark9473   08/04/08 10:38 AM

Extra information
13 registered and 8 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  EdZ 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 1304


Jump to

CN Forums Home



Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics