Click here if you are having trouble logging into the forums
Privacy Policy |
Please read our Terms
of Service | Signup and
Troubleshooting FAQ | Problems? PM a Red or a Green Gu.... uh, User
jayscheuerle
Post Laureate
   
Reged: 01/16/06
Posts: 3096
Loc: S. Philadelphia, PA
|
Re: Wide (not thick!) spider vanes and off axis light
08/07/08 04:28 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Hi,
I use a thin circular baffle over the secondary hanging off the spider body. I make the hole big enough to illuminated the required field and the outside diameter big enough to vignette the far side of the tube from the field. Either 2/3mm Al or an old CD will do. I cover it with black felt as well. It works well with only a small diffraction effect.
Carl Zeiss used a circular baffle extending down from the spider body over the secondary. The front of the baffle was as far down as needed to only see the primary from the field and a hole was machined into the side facing the field. Ideally you need a conical swing of the cutter for the hole. That could be achieved with a router on a overhead pivot. See Patrick Spielman Router Jigs and Techniques for a clue.
Cheers. Andrew.
Andrew, I'm having a tough time visualizing this. Do you have any images? - j
-------------------- 12" Green Goblin (trusser w/Protstar secondary and OWL refigured primary)• 6" f/5 Eero2 ball-scope • 6" f/5 Frankenscope • Garrett Optical 10x50 binos • Edmund 8" yoke-mounted red-tube reflector • Edmund 6" GEQ red-tube reflector (on loan to Dad)
Gone, but with lessons learned:
Skyquest XT8 • NexSTar 8i • Eeroscope 6" f/5 ball(sacrifice was not in vain) • Vixen ED80sf • Edmund red-tube 4.25" f/10 • Edmund Astroscan
Facts are stubborn things.
|
|
8 registered and 8 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: Don W, Joe Cipriano
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
|
Rating:
Thread views: 649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|