Telescope Reviews: Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?

You are not logged in. [Login]

Forum Archives · Entrance · Main Index · Search · New user · Who's Online
FAQ · Calendar

Telescope Specific Forums >> Meade ETX

caheaton
super member

Reged: 05/26/09
Posts: 157
Loc: SW Ohio

Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?
05/27/09 04:21 PM

Thanks for the quick reply, Art. That agrees with my research...but for fairly short exposures (under 30 seconds), the tracking appears to be adequate. That's why I'm concerned about image brightness.

Also, you stole my avatar! In other forums to which I subscribe, I've always used good old Charlie Brown. Looks like I'll have to find a different one for this forum. :-)
Craig

--------------------
Craig
Ancient Tasco 4.5" (from back when Tasco's were good)
Meade ETX-80
Orion XT10i
Meade Super Plossls 6.4, 9.7, 15 & 26mm
Zhumell Z Planetary 3mm
Agena Ultra Wide 30mm

Post Extras

Entire thread
Subject	Posted by	Posted on
80 or 90 for imaging?	caheaton	05/27/09 03:52 PM
Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?	Arthur Dent	05/27/09 04:11 PM
Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?	rmollise	05/27/09 06:03 PM
Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?	jgraham	05/27/09 06:09 PM
Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?	Domerman	05/29/09 07:13 PM
Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?	caheaton	06/05/09 10:12 AM
Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?	AlexDJ30	06/07/09 07:13 PM
Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?	caheaton	05/27/09 04:21 PM
Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?	Arthur Dent	05/27/09 04:25 PM
Re: 80 or 90 for imaging?	Arthur Dent	05/27/09 04:37 PM

Extra information

1 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator: Shadowalker, oldsalt

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 509

Jump to

CN Forums

Home

Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics