iOptron ZEQ25, initial impressions
#601
Posted 04 October 2013 - 11:06 AM
Thanks for the correction. Well, that's still longer than I think would be comfortable. Others using longish refractors may have found otherwise.
#602
Posted 04 October 2013 - 11:29 AM
The more people who e-mail support (at) ioptron.com the more they realize what users want.
#603
Posted 04 October 2013 - 11:39 AM
#604
Posted 04 October 2013 - 12:09 PM
I'll check but I think that that has been addressed in the Yahoo group. Just sent my email request to support.
Mike
#605
Posted 04 October 2013 - 12:17 PM
Brian
#606
Posted 04 October 2013 - 12:29 PM
Bill,
I'll check but I think that that has been addressed in the Yahoo group. Just sent my email request to support.
Mike
Which Yahoo group? The imaging Ioptron or just Ioptron?
Brian
#607
Posted 04 October 2013 - 12:29 PM
1) The old two-star alignment and offset readings was of limited accuracy and hit-or-miss, and they received a complaint about this;
2) PPEC requires a hardware upgrade.
#608
Posted 04 October 2013 - 01:22 PM
#609
Posted 04 October 2013 - 03:45 PM
iOptron has already responded to my e-mail!
1) The old two-star alignment and offset readings was of limited accuracy and hit-or-miss, and they received a complaint about this;
2) PPEC requires a hardware upgrade.
Thats pretty much the same answer i received as well. The Z25 lacks the hardware for PPEC and that with the old two star method "the accuracy is very much case dependent" and it was "for reference only". They also indicated that people have indicated that they can achieve five minuet images unguided with the new align routine.
Brian
#610
Posted 04 October 2013 - 09:40 PM
I got the same reply. Not much chance to get them to do either request. The lack of PPEC is about the only thing that is better on the iEQ30. Not that it is a big deal for me anyway. Since you need a guide scope to record it, I'll just use a guide scope and forget PEC.
Mike
#611
Posted 04 October 2013 - 10:47 PM
#612
Posted 04 October 2013 - 11:03 PM
#613
Posted 04 October 2013 - 11:22 PM
#614
Posted 05 October 2013 - 07:21 AM
Since with the shims you can tighten down enough to cause an overcurrent fault (too tight) you can produce as much useful force as any other solution.
#615
Posted 05 October 2013 - 09:28 AM
Well as many of you know I tried like hell to own a ZEQ from iOptropn. After 2 failures I decided to go in a different direction and get the AVX. I can here the BOOOOs now. I came yesterday, I got it out of the box set it up went through the alignment procedures and the goto's are dead center in a 11mm eyepiece every time.
The AVX is larger but I can still move it with the scope and counter weight without much trouble.
Thanks all for your helpful suggestions.
See ya on the AVX site..
Eric
#616
Posted 05 October 2013 - 09:32 AM
Well as many of you know I tried like hell to own a ZEQ from iOptropn. After 2 failures I decided to go in a different direction and get the AVX. I can here the BOOOOs now. It came yesterday, I got it out of the box set it up went through the alignment procedures and the goto's are dead center in a 11mm eyepiece every time.
The AVX is larger but I can still move it with the scope and counter weight without much trouble.
Thanks all for your helpful suggestions.
See ya on the AVX site..
Eric
It came yesterday I didn't....
#617
Posted 05 October 2013 - 10:24 AM
Last Update,
Well as many of you know I tried like hell to own a ZEQ from iOptropn. After 2 failures I decided to go in a different direction and get the AVX. I can here the BOOOOs now. It came yesterday, I got it out of the box set it up went through the alignment procedures and the goto's are dead center in a 11mm eyepiece every time.
The AVX is larger but I can still move it with the scope and counter weight without much trouble.
Thanks all for your helpful suggestions.
See ya on the AVX site..
Eric
It came yesterday I didn't....
No boos here. Congrats on finding what works for you.
#618
Posted 05 October 2013 - 03:51 PM
#619
Posted 05 October 2013 - 07:32 PM
if you have a little too much play in the gears, as I had yesterday, I reopened the RA drive system for the zillionth time and found that the brass screw that holds the worm gear was about a 1/16th of a turn loose, tighten it to finger tight, no pressure as it will create friction with the worm/pulley assembly.
Good catch, and easy to check with the plastic RA cover off.
Lightly rock the mount in RA (no, lighter than that)...watch the action of the worm housing, if you can see it moving side to side, the worm adjuster nut is probably too loose. It will help if you run the tension adjuster all the way in while checking for side to side play. Apply pressure to the top of the housing with your free hand if necessary to isolate the movement.
The RA worm adjuster is just accessible on the encoder side, you can use a pocket screwdriver to nudge it a bit closer to the worm shoulder. Again, as mentioned, just until the play is gone. If you preload the worm bearing too much, you will pick up stiction from the ball bearings stacking against the race.
If you adjust it way too tight, be prepared to trip an Overcurrent Message.
Hope the info helps,
Paul
#620
Posted 05 October 2013 - 11:41 PM
#621
Posted 06 October 2013 - 01:31 AM
#622
Posted 06 October 2013 - 11:01 AM
Great advice, and highly appreciated. I hope someone can do a YouTube for those of us who aren't mechanically experienced and prone to misidentifying parts and misinterpreting technical instructions. Video is worth a million words.
I made an instruction to fix the crosstalk noise problem. You can see some photos of internal parts. It may help a bit.
https://docs.google....dit?usp=sharing
Anat
#623
Posted 06 October 2013 - 12:16 PM
So, my zero on the dovetail saddle is about 1-2 degrees left of straight in the locked position. Is this a big deal or an easy fix? If it doesn't affect anything I'll just leave it.
Anyone?
#624
Posted 06 October 2013 - 05:48 PM
So, my zero on the dovetail saddle is about 1-2 degrees left of straight in the locked position. Is this a big deal or an easy fix? If it doesn't affect anything I'll just leave it.
Nope, not a big deal at all. As long as your RA and DEC axes are squared to whatever base level you refer to, it will be fine.
Clear skies,
Paul
Anyone?
#625
Posted 06 October 2013 - 06:30 PM