
Going Retro
Discuss this article in our forums
Last night I spent some
quality time with one pair each of old Vixen/Celestron 25MM and 17MM
Kellners in my DenkII binoviewers.
First, these early 1980's
vintage eyepieces are very well made. Machine work is excellent and
ergonomics first rate. Even the good old MagFl coatings were
excellent. With a blue sky above, looking down into the eyepieces,
which had black end caps on, I saw very little reflection back thru
the lenses. Only a deep rich, very dark blue/black.
The scope
was my 11" F12 D&G achromat, at first stopped down to 8.5",
which yields an F16 stop size, and then later, when the glass and
seeing had settled down, I used the full 11" at F12. I also had
the Chromacor color corrector in tow all the time. Subjects were the
moon for high contrast and sharpness and Jupiter for low-level
contrast.
I must say, at least at these slow scope speeds,
these guys gave up nothing to the more expensive orthos and Plossls
I've got.
I used them as the first eyepieces of the evening
to get a feeling for their performance without comparisons. The
viewing was superb. The moon was extremely sharp with that "etched"
or chiseled appearance. The subtle variations in browns and tans of
the surface were readily seen. On Jupiter the planets body stood in
sharp relief against the background blackness of space with a minimal
scattered light "glow" around the planet. The very subtle,
low contrast structuring in the poles and between the equatorial
belts were no challenge really.
Importantly, I felt no urgent
need to swap them out with the other eyepieces. I was enjoying the
view as is. Why bother?
But being a compulsive eyepiece
junkie I did do comparisons with my Vixen/Celestron 26 & 17 MM
Silver Tops and my Denk 14 & 21 MM's. The Silver Tops are of
similar vintage but one price point up from the KE's and from the
same OEM while the Denks represent the state of the art 25 years
later....at a 10X (!!) price point.
The 26 MM Silver Tops did
have the wider AFOV than the 25 MM Kellners but, even after taking
into account the subtly lower magnification of the 26 MM Silver Tops
there were no readily noticeable differences in sharpness/contrast.
The 17MM Silver Tops and Kellenrs both had about the same AFOV and I
felt the Silver Tops were a bit sharper at the field stop but it's
really splitting hairs and I had to do several swaps to make sure.
Only the Denks displayed why you might be able to justify
spending more for eyepieces on such slow F ratio scopes. Both the 14
and 21 MM displayed NO glow around Jupiter and had very generous
AFOV’s with even better off-axis sharpness and an “abruptness”
or “Tah-Dah” to the image that I find very attractive.
However, there is no free lunch as the Denks do weigh considerably
more, especially as a set, and the eye positioning on the Denk 14MM
was a bit more restrictive. And I already mentioned the price thing.
Interestingly, though, the Kellners focal lengths, like those of the
Silver Top Plossls, complimented those of the Denks.
So who
says you need to spend a pound of 10’s on super expensive
eyepieces with a slow refractor? You don’t. You can go retro
and get great results. At their price point's (about $40.00 for each
pair) I'm keeping these guys and their performance level will keep
them away from the public star party crowd.
In this
application I got high-end construction and performance with a CHEAP
price for admission.
As results may vary by scope design, I
will next do some comparisons using my “slow” TEC and
Intes Mak-Cass’s.
Jeff
0 Comments