Cosmic Challenge: NGC 6453
Discuss this article in our forums
|
Cosmic
Challenge:
|
July 2024 |
|
|
|
Phil Harrington |
|
|
|
|
|
This
month's suggested
|
|
|
6- to
|
Target |
Type |
RA |
DEC |
Constellation |
Mag. |
Size |
NGC 6453 |
Globular |
17h 50.9m |
-34° 35.9' |
Scorpius |
10.1 |
8' |
The open cluster team of M6 and M7, floating just north of the Scorpion's stinger, creates one of the prettiest binocular sights in the summer sky. Even the smallest pocket binocular will show that the brightest stars in M6 form a rectangular pattern that inventive eyes can imagine as the outline of a butterfly. M7 is even larger and brighter than M6, and bursts into an exceptionally striking assortment of stars covering an area larger than the Full Moon. Several of its 80 stars show subtle hues of yellow and blue.
|
Above: Summer star map showing the location of this month's Cosmic Challenge.
Credit: Map adapted from Star Watch by Phil Harrington. |
Above: Finder chart for this month's Cosmic Challenge.
Credit: Chart adapted from Cosmic Challenge by Phil Harrington.
|
Although
conventional wisdom says that M7 is far too large to enjoy through most
telescopes because of their narrow fields of view, studying it through 6-inch
(15-cm) or larger instruments reveals a buried treasure nestled near the
cluster's western edge. John Herschel is credited with discovering this little
gem, NGC 6453, on
NGC 6453
shines at 10th magnitude and measures nearly 8' across. Were it alone in the
sky, it would be a fairly routine catch in 8-inch (20-cm) and larger
apertures. But NGC 6453 is not isolated by any means; instead, it is immersed
in a heavily packed field of stars. Spotting it can be literally like finding a
needle in a haystack! To catch a glimpse, start with a low-power, wide-field
eyepiece in your telescope and aim toward M7. From the jumble of bright stars
in M7's center, look for HD
|
Above: NGC 6453 as sketched by CN'er Sheliak_sp through his 12-inch (305-mm) reflector at 62.5x.
Below: Open cluster M7 and globular cluster NGC 6453. Credit: Starhopper, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons |
|
At 112x, my 8-inch (20-cm) reflector displays an unresolved smudge of light buried in a stellar ocean. Don't confuse the few faint points scattered across the globular for object resolution. These are most likely foreground stars, since the cluster's brightest stellar citizens are no brighter than 14th magnitude. That's because the cluster, which is 37,000 years from Earth, is positioned inward toward the galactic center. Its location, only 3,260 light years from the core of the Milky Way, confounds our view because of many intervening clouds of cosmic dust.
The dust causes significant reddening and obscuration, complicating studies. To counteract the effects, astronomers use infrared (IR) techniques, as IR energy can penetrate dust more effectively than visible light. Doing this, astronomers have found that stars in NGC 6453 have low metallicity, indicating they formed early in the universe.
Studies
also reveal that NGC 6453 may have originated in an ancient progenitor galaxy
sometimes referred to as Kraken (Kruijssen et
al. 2019 and 2020) or Koala
(Forbes 2020). The Milky Way
cannibalized this galaxy in a major accretion event that occurred between 9-11
billion years ago.
The accretion of Kraken/Koala played a crucial role in shaping the structure
and composition of the Milky Way, contributing to its growth through the
addition of stars and clusters from the smaller galaxy. In addition to NGC
6453, 20 other globular clusters are thought to have originated in
Kraken/Koala. These include NGC 5946, NGC 5986, NGC 6093, NGC 6139, NGC 6144,
NGC 6256, NGC 6273, NGC 6287, NGC 6333, NGC 6401, NGC 6402, NGC 6517, NGC 6541,
NGC 6544, NGC 6681, NGC 6712, NGC 6809, FSR 1735, and Ton 2. The study of the
chemical compositions and orbital parameters of these clusters supports their
common origin, as they share distinct similarities.
The identification of these clusters as remnants of the Koala galaxy helps
astronomers understand the processes of galactic evolution and the role of
dwarf galaxies in building larger galactic structures. The study of such
ancient mergers allows researchers to piece together the Milky Way's past and
offers insights into the broader mechanisms of galaxy formation and
development.
Have a favorite challenge object of your own? I'd love to hear about it, as well as how you did with this month's test. Contact me through my website or post to this month's discussion forum.
Until next month, remember that half of the fun is the thrill of the chase. Game on!
|
About
the Author: |
Phil Harrington's Cosmic Challenge is copyright 2024 by Philip S. Harrington. All rights reserved. No reproduction, in whole or in part, beyond single copies for use by an individual, is permitted without written permission of the copyright holder. |
- Dave Mitsky, John O'Hara, warddl and 4 others like this
7 Comments
Phil:
NGC 6453 is a favorite of mine. M7 appears to be a bright open cluster ideally suited for binoculars or a small scope.
But underlying M7 is a rich field that includes NGC6463 as well several groupings of faint stars that could be open clusters apparently are not.
I normally use one of my Dobs to view M7 and 6543, maybe tonight I'll give it a try in my 4 inch.
Thanks for another challenge.
Jon
I'll put NGC 6543 on the list of targets for tonight, if the weather cooperates, or the near future.
Just for the record, I'm at about 32.7°N with a clear view to the south. NGC6453 transits at about 22.5°.
Last night conditions were not ideal. SQM-L was 21.0 mpsas and along the southern horizon the was visible smoke from a wildfire across the border 20 miles or so to the west.
In any event, with my 4 inch F/5.4 TV refractor, I was able to see NGC-6463 as a small fuzzy spot at 70-150x.
Jon
I imaged NGC 6453 with my Seestar S50 from the orange zone Naylor Observatory on Sunday night. I'll post the image later today.
I spent a fair amount of time trying to locate NGC 6453 using the observatory's 17" f/15 classical Cassegrain but I wasn't successful. It was quite low in altitude, barely above the arbor vitae in the south, and clouds had begun to blanket the southern sky.
I have a good idea where to look and will try again at the next opportunity.
At least I got a reasonably good image of the cluster.
Here's an annotated Seestar S50 image of NGC 6453 from last night.
Attached Thumbnails
NGC 6453 was a tough nut to crack. I'm reasonably sure that I saw it this morning using the Naylor Observatory's 17" f/15 classical Cassegrain at 170, 216, 259, and 324x, with 259x providing the best view, if you can call it that. The 17" was almost horizontal while I was attempting to observe the globular cluster and part of its aperture was blocked by the southern part of the dome wall . My best SQM-L reading was 19.80 mpsas.
Yesterday evening (7/12/2024 around 11PM CDT) was clear enough to give this a try, though under less than ideal transparency in western Kentucky. I observed with a 10" f/4 and a 21mm eyepiece giving a 2 degree field of view at 48x. M7 was nicely framed. Moving to the location for NGC 6453 revealed a small, dim glow that could have been easily overlooked. Changing eyepieces to give 114x confirmed the unresolved glowing patch. My views were similar to those Phil describes through his 8". The contrast between M7 and NGC 6453 was nice.
I checked my observing notes and found I had observed NGC 6453 under pristine Arizona skies five years ago with a 16" LX200. At 203x it was immediately apparent as a small globular cluster. I also noted that I had observed all but NGC 5946 and FSR 1735 of the "Kraken globulars" due to those two being rather far south.
I appreciate the background given in each month's challenge that gives additional perspective on the featured object(s). Thanks for the excellent series!