- The Eye of the Flak (Das Auge der Flak)
- COMPARING THE MASUYAMA 25MM 52°, 25MM 65°, AND 26MM 85°
- BRESSER 4 Inch f 4.5 AR 102XS Refractor visual observers’ REVIEW
- New Moon Telescopes 16”f/4
- The Ages of Astrophotography 1839-2015
- Stardust Gallery LED Lightbox and Metallic Print Review
- Rayox Saddle Review
- MoonLite NiteCrawler Focuser
- Celestron Cometron 7x50s Review
- Astro-Devices (of Ukraine) Parallelogram Standard II Pro
- Review: Explore Scientific 16”, Europe edition, late 2016
- VITE 2X Barlow Lens Review
- Sky Commander Review
- Wireless Control of Canon EOS DSLRs with DSLR Controller and TP-Link MR3040 W...
- Review of the 18” f/5 Otte binodobson
CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.
Rigel Quick Finder and Telrad
Rigel Quick Finder and Telrad
by Oldfield So (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Since I found that my Celestron Star Pointer (see another article) is inadequate for my C8, I proceed to search for better alternatives. The Telrad and the Rigel Quick Finder are the natural choices, I bought both of them since the shipping cost is too high if I order only one item.
I have a 6x30 finder which comes with the C8 OTA, but since the bracket cannot be removed from the OTA easily, I found it not so portable. At the same time, I'm used to use a unit finder, and that's why I go for these two infamous unit finders.
P.S: I sold my 6x30 Celestron LER finder soon after I got my Rigel Quick Finder.
The Package and the Options
The Telrad comes with a single base, variable brightness control, no battery, and 3 concentric circles of 0.5 degree, 2 degree and 4 degree. It is longer and heavier than the Rigel Quick Finder.
The Rigel Quick Finder comes with two bases, variable brightness control, Lithium battery included, and 2 concentric circles of 0.5 degree and 2 degree. The blinking reticle is a standard feature in the Rigel Quick Finder. It is shorter and lighter than the Telrad, but since it stands on its base, it is actually taller when in operation.
The switches on the Telrad are larger and better placed, so it's easier to use and more accessible. The switches on the Rigel Quick Finder are located on the opposite side when it is in operation, however, I have to say, both are very easy to use.
The Telrad uses standard AA battery and the Rigel Quick Finder uses CR2320 Lithium battery. With the Telrad, you have to provide your own battery and with the Rigel Quick Finder, you have them included in the package.
There are three alignment switches for both of them for alignment.
The Rigel Quick Finder and the Telrad at work
Both work similarly, very easy to view through, with an infinite "eye-relief". Parallax is not a problem in both of them for any person, much better than a red dot finder.
Alignment to the main optics is easy for both units, with the Telrad even easier. It is easier than the Celestron Star Pointer and also a conventional finder in a 3/6 points adjustment bracket. The switches of the Rigel Quick Finder are a bit small, especially the one which control blinking of the reticle, the rest are okay. It's alright for the weather here in Hong Kong weather since it won't be too cold, but if you've to manipulate those switches with heavy gloves on, it would be difficult, if not impossible especially for the blinking switch, but all other switches are large enough, just not as comfortable with the Telrad. Alignment of both units is easier than an conventional optical finder.
The Telrad has a larger (4 degree) circle, which is nice for star hopping. In a light polluted sky, landmark stars are not always available and so the extra 4 degree of the Telrad is nice, but under better sky, the 2 circles of the Rigel suffice.
The Telrad is larger and it would be awkward to use it on a smaller scope. The Telrad is also much heavier and balance of light OTAs might be upset. The footprint it casts on the OTA is long as well. Be careful that someone might find their tube rings are hindering the installation of the Telrad due to its long foot print.
To use an unit finder, as usual, you view through the reticle using one eye and see the sky with the other eye. It seems strange and difficult, but it is easy once you try to do so! The sky look exactly like in the star chart, you have more stars or better say, more context, to look for your target. At a light polluted sky, however, an optical finder would be nicer for it provides more light gathering than naked eyes, the magnification it gives also increase the constrast of the targets by darkening the sky background. Better yet, you can augment your Telrad or Rigel Quick Finder with a conventional optical finder. Objects invisible for the naked eyes will be invisible with the unit finders, but there's a chance to glimpse it with a conventional optical finder.
Both are fun and easy to use. I found the blinking reticle not very useful since you can dim the reticle and it serves the same purpose. However, I guess it will be useful in those truely dark sky which is absent here in Hong Kong. Each of them has their own pros and cons, so maybe it's fine to get both of them!
Both finders have adjustable brightness control and the range is wide enough that you can use it without affecting your night vision (not tested in truely dark sky) and you can use it to locate the moon.
Last but not least, you don't have to use optical finder and these nice unit finders exclusively, you can use both of them. But , if you are comparing any optical finder with less than or 30mm aperture, I believe it's better to go for a Telrad or Rigel.
|Telrad||Rigel Quick Finder|
|Slightly more expensive||Slightly cheaper|
|Larger switches, easier to turn||Smaller switches, might be difficult to turn|
|Heavier, might upset overall balance||A lot lighter|
|Much larger||More compact|
|Much larger footprint||Small footprint|
|The reticle is nearer to the OTA, but still easy to peep through||The reticle is higher on the OTA, easier to peep through|
|Blinking reticle optional||Blinking reticle standard|
|Come with one base only||Come with two bases|
|More robust in attaching and detacting||Faster to attach and detact, less robust however|
|One more large 4 degree circle||Just 2 degree + 0.5 degree circle|
|Use AA battery||Use CR2320 Lithium battery|
|Better build||A bit weaker, on the screen for reticle projection|
What I love:
- More intuitive than conventional finders
- Better than a red dot for longer focal length telescopes
- A little bit expensive given the build quality