Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Astro Video Image Gallery

  • Please log in to reply
7435 replies to this topic

#76 Jack Huerkamp

Jack Huerkamp

    Vendor - Waning Moon

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1089
  • Joined: 13 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Louisiana

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:09 AM

Greg,

Let me know how that Speco monitor works out. I have been eyeing it for several months due to its smaller size than the 14" Sanyo that I have been using. It weighs a lot less and its power consumption is considerably lower making it more appealing to those who use batteries and inverters.

Jack
  • FirstC8 likes this

#77 Jack Huerkamp

Jack Huerkamp

    Vendor - Waning Moon

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1089
  • Joined: 13 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Louisiana

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:24 AM

Here is a digital camera shot of the monitor showing M101. I was using a 12 second MallinCam B&W HYPER on my 17.5" TeleKit with COulter mirror.

Posted Image

Jack

#78 Jack Huerkamp

Jack Huerkamp

    Vendor - Waning Moon

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1089
  • Joined: 13 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Louisiana

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:24 AM

Here is one of M16 using the same setup.

Posted Image

Jack

#79 Jack Huerkamp

Jack Huerkamp

    Vendor - Waning Moon

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1089
  • Joined: 13 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Louisiana

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:26 AM

Here is M51 - again a digital camera image of the monitor as seem with a 12 second exposure on a 17.5".

Posted Image

Jack

#80 smokin oakum

smokin oakum

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
  • Joined: 24 Sep 2007
  • Loc: Wilmington, NC

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:36 AM

Jack-this only makes it harder to wait.

Great shots!

Neil

#81 mclewis1

mclewis1

    Thread Killer

  • *****
  • Posts: 18451
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2006
  • Loc: New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 20 December 2007 - 12:01 PM

Jack,

Great shots, can we assume that the live views are in general a little "smoother"? I figure that the camera is capturing the scan lines on the monitor which aren't likely to be visible to the naked eye.

#82 BradH

BradH

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1058
  • Joined: 19 Jun 2004
  • Loc: Spencer, Indiana

Posted 20 December 2007 - 12:38 PM

I found this shot of M51 I took 5-22-07 with the TOA150 single image no processing.

Brad

Attached Thumbnails

  • 2063708-m 51 5-22.JPG


#83 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 20 December 2007 - 01:54 PM

Greg,
After seeing the rest of your images I have three reactions:
1.Shock and awe. Stunning!!!
2.You qualify as the first astroimpressionist.
3.I'll be right over.
Just wonderful!

Bill


Thanks Bill,
I'm still fairly new at this so I'm working on Focusing, a secondary light shroud for my truss tubes to keep out all stray light, more flocking, and some separate light blocking pannels that can be moved for use in my backyard and my driveway. Also I'm sticking pretty close to the Basic camera setting that came with the camera, and only really playing with the monitor settings.
I had Very good results the very first time I used the MallinCam...I'm good at tweaking my scopes but was unsure about getting into using a camera ... it was very easy to use. The first time out with the MallinCam M16 and the Pillars of Creation in COLOR, :jump: :jump: :jump:
I'll post some of my first views on my monitor, taken with a hand held digital camera, keep in mind these monitor images are of my first few times using the MallinCam, or any camera for that matter... So these images are not (of course) the best that the MallinCam can do, and there was alot of light pollution, but these are what a person can expect the first time out with no imaging experience.
Some may say, Yea but you are using a 30" scope...that's true, But I'm beginning to look for a smaller scope to use in my light polluted site because my big scope also picks up all the light pollution. I believe a 10" to 14" scope with good tracking, flocking, and a nice long flocked dew shield (even on a reflector) may produce better results from a light polluted site,(Not a Dark Site). Scattered light that the camera can pickup is what really hurts the Image. Something like a Meade LXD 75 10"SN :question: I wonder if anyone is using one of those with a MallinCam??? A question for another tread maybe.
Greg

Attached Thumbnails

  • 2063841-IMG_0243.jpg


#84 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 20 December 2007 - 01:59 PM

And M-104

Attached Thumbnails

  • 2063852-IMG_0195.jpg


#85 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 20 December 2007 - 02:01 PM

And M-51

Attached Thumbnails

  • 2063857-IMG_0192.jpg


#86 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 20 December 2007 - 02:03 PM

And M-64 Blackeye

Attached Thumbnails

  • 2063863-IMG_0197.jpg


#87 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 20 December 2007 - 02:05 PM

And M-57

Attached Thumbnails

  • 2063867-IMG_0218.jpg

  • NGC1499 likes this

#88 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 20 December 2007 - 02:10 PM

And I'm Not sure Which Galaxy this is...M-81 Maybe or M-65 or M-66... I'm not sure... When I'm using this camera I'm still too excited to take notes... :grin:
Greg

Attached Thumbnails

  • 2063883-IMG_0210.jpg


#89 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 20 December 2007 - 02:41 PM

Greg,

Let me know how that Speco monitor works out. I have been eyeing it for several months due to its smaller size than the 14" Sanyo that I have been using. It weighs a lot less and its power consumption is considerably lower making it more appealing to those who use batteries and inverters.

Jack


OK Jack I'll let you know how it goes. I just contacted the company I ordered it from because they have not provided me with a tracking #. The gal said it was shipping out today....I said " Why so late on the shipping, I ordered it on Monday? (This now being Thursday) And She said " ahh I Ahhh well ahhh oh yeah it was back ordered... Yeah that's it, it was back ordered. I said OK.... When Can I Have My Tracking #??? Sometime Tomorrow she said... So I said :mad: Thank you very much for your help! :grin:

I spent hours searching on line for a HighRes Monitors. Most say HighRes but only have 300-350 lines of resolution.
Thanks for telling me about this one Jack.
I found one with 600 lines but it cost twice as much as the one I ordered with 500 lines.

Greg

#90 Jack Huerkamp

Jack Huerkamp

    Vendor - Waning Moon

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1089
  • Joined: 13 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Louisiana

Posted 20 December 2007 - 03:06 PM

Mark,

You are correct. It is hard to take a digital camera picture of a monitor and not get the lines. The live image is much smoother.

Jack

#91 Jack Huerkamp

Jack Huerkamp

    Vendor - Waning Moon

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1089
  • Joined: 13 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Louisiana

Posted 20 December 2007 - 03:11 PM

Greg,

That's M66.

Jack

#92 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 20 December 2007 - 04:56 PM

Greg,

That's M66.

Jack


I thought it was one of the two (65 or 66) I have not gotten back two that one with the MallinCam yet. It looks like I was getting some color out of the spiral arms, but that was the first CRT monitor I tried and I couldn't adjust the image on the screen very well, so the back ground was not dark and I didn't get as much detail as I can now. I can't wait to try it again and this time from a dark site, with a little more experience, and with the new 9" monitor.
Greg

#93 Jack Huerkamp

Jack Huerkamp

    Vendor - Waning Moon

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1089
  • Joined: 13 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Louisiana

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:17 PM

Here are a few single frame grabs from DVDs recorded at Chiefland Astronomy Village in May of 2007. I used an AverTV Cardbus PC card in my HP laptop to capture the frames. The 720X480 snapshots were resized in Paint Shop Pro to 640X480. I was using my 17.5" with ServoCAT drive and the camera was in the 56 second mode.

Posted Image

Posted Image

#94 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:35 PM

Very nice Jack,
It looks like your ServoCat was tracking quite well for 56 seconds. I sometimes run into trouble over 28 seconds and only a few times have I been able to make 56 seconds work. I think it depends on what part of the sky I'm pointed at.
Greg

#95 Jack Huerkamp

Jack Huerkamp

    Vendor - Waning Moon

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 1089
  • Joined: 13 Oct 2005
  • Loc: Louisiana

Posted 20 December 2007 - 09:17 PM

Greg,

You are quite right about tracking and the place in the sky you are looking at. We all noticed that at Chiefland. In certain parts of the sky, tracking at 56 seconds would work and at others trailing was obvious. The closer to the zenith, the more noticeable the field rotation. I can play back some of my observations near the zenith in fast forward mode and watch the sky rotate.

Jack

#96 Mike Harvey

Mike Harvey

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1533
  • Joined: 01 Mar 2004
  • Loc: Melbourne Beach, FL.

Posted 21 December 2007 - 01:53 AM

...can we assume that the live views are in general a little "smoother"? I figure that the camera is capturing the scan lines on the monitor which aren't likely to be visible to the naked eye.


YES!

Some time ago I suggested NOT posting any images from the monitors because they just don't do justice to what we're actually seeing!
If I wasn't already a Mallincam user and the only concept I had of its' performance was gleaned from most of the images on these threads, I would be disappointed.

I have yet to see even one posted image that comes close to matching the 'real-time' views!

Mike Harvey

#97 Chris Schroeder

Chris Schroeder

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 8515
  • Joined: 11 Dec 2004
  • Loc: N.E. WI Sky Glow

Posted 21 December 2007 - 09:41 AM

But that is true with anything visual, is it not? Taking photos of the screen, while not doing the true visual justice, it gives us an idea, much like those who sketch.

#98 jayscheuerle

jayscheuerle

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4681
  • Joined: 16 Jan 2006
  • Loc: S. Philadelphia, PA

Posted 21 December 2007 - 02:54 PM

Personally, I find the images taken from the monitors to look much more natural than the ones captured via a cards. - j

#99 BradH

BradH

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1058
  • Joined: 19 Jun 2004
  • Loc: Spencer, Indiana

Posted 21 December 2007 - 04:56 PM

Greg

What a great shot of M16.

Brad

#100 greg

greg

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 25 Jan 2005
  • Loc: Central Ca.

Posted 21 December 2007 - 05:13 PM

Thanks Brad,
That was one of my first objects, The MallinCam is so easy to use.
Greg


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics