
Astro-Tech Voyager Mount
#1
Posted 11 January 2009 - 06:20 AM
#2
Posted 12 January 2009 - 10:12 AM
#3
Posted 12 January 2009 - 11:20 AM
#4
Posted 12 January 2009 - 05:46 PM
Great review. I was tempted to write a review myself on the Voyager I've had for about a year and I agree that it's an awesome grab and go set up. As for the height, I opted to use a CG5 tripod which gets the scope up far enough for me to stand while observing. I just need to bend over a little bit to see to the zenith.
- Voilam likes this
#5
Posted 12 January 2009 - 07:13 PM
#6
Posted 12 January 2009 - 07:25 PM
motions and the vibrations. I really want something that will be reasonably stable and still keep vibrations under 1 second with a sharp rap to the tube. What do you all think?
I could also put the mount head on a beefier tripod if that would give me the desired result.
Rob
#7
Posted 12 January 2009 - 08:29 PM
K W TONG
----------------
C8 + CG-5GT, TSA102 + HEQ5 PRO, MK67 + Voyager Mount, WO ZS 80FD + Kenko NES, NexStar 6SE, WO Megrez 72 + Mizar K Mount, Mini Borg 50, C5, PST
- Voilam likes this
#9
Posted 12 January 2009 - 09:45 PM
#10
Posted 12 January 2009 - 09:50 PM
Would this be a good mount for a 4" F6 refractor? I have tried a bunch of alt.az. mounts only to be disappointed by the
motions and the vibrations. I really want something that will be reasonably stable and still keep vibrations under 1 second with a sharp rap to the tube. What do you all think?
I could also put the mount head on a beefier tripod if that would give me the desired result.
Rob
Depends on what 4" F6 it is. My 3" F8 is about the same length. I would guess the slight weight difference wouldn't be much. If it's a smaller, lighter OTA like the Orion 100mm F6, it should be fine in the 1-2 second range. A heavier triplett APO might be slightly worse but not much. With my 6" F5, it is still 1-2 seconds on the grass so I can't imagine it would be any worse than that.
Thanks!
#11
Posted 12 January 2009 - 10:57 PM
The movements aren't buttery smooth like an EZTouch, but that means that balance is not as critical, which helps. The slo-mos are also a plus.
I bought mine to mount a C6, but last time had the ED100 f/9 on it. The mount worked well with both -- but the tripod is too short!
I have considered the available extender, but will probably look for a CG-5 or a wood compatible tripod.
#12
Posted 13 January 2009 - 07:07 PM
#13
Posted 13 January 2009 - 08:51 PM
#14
Posted 16 January 2009 - 12:09 PM
Thank you also. I was on the fence about getting a Voyager, and after reading your review, I ordered one.
#15
Posted 16 January 2009 - 03:18 PM
#16
Posted 16 January 2009 - 05:11 PM

#17
Posted 16 January 2009 - 05:15 PM
#18
Posted 16 January 2009 - 05:56 PM
I agree with Mike on the assertion of taking more than an 80mm scope. My 6" F5 rides very nice on this mount. The only thing I would worry about is if it was a really long scope, such as an F10 4". The moment arm might lengthen the time the vibrations dampen out by a second or so. Some wouldn't mind it, some might. YMMV as they say.
I will try it one of these nights if it ever clears in mid-Michigan with one of my larger refractors. I'd do it tonight but I have a new MX7C to try out and it's actually clear!
#19
Posted 16 January 2009 - 05:58 PM
It will be a great match for the 127mm Starmax if that is the scope you intend to use it for!
#20
Posted 16 January 2009 - 08:06 PM
Paul,
It will be a great match for the 127mm Starmax if that is the scope you intend to use it for!
Yes that it will be used for primarily. It's going to fly with me to New Mexico in June. Plus I have a small car and want to take it to my brother's place in northern Michigan.

#21
Posted 16 January 2009 - 08:18 PM
Do you think I would have any problems with my Celestron 120 Omni f/8.3. It is 40" long and 12.5 lbs. I am thinking of getting this if it will support my scope. Also, will the mount work with my tripod (CG-4), i heard it will work with the CG-5)
thanks
don c
#22
Posted 16 January 2009 - 08:31 PM
Thanks for the great photos accompanying your review, also!
#23
Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:25 PM
Paul,
It will be a great match for the 127mm Starmax if that is the scope you intend to use it for!
Yes that it will be used for primarily. It's going to fly with me to New Mexico in June. Plus I have a small car and want to take it to my brother's place in northern Michigan.![]()
You'll have to try and come in September some time, during the Great Lakes Star Gaze. Nice star party in North-Central Michigan.
#24
Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:30 PM
An excellent review.
Do you think I would have any problems with my Celestron 120 Omni f/8.3. It is 40" long and 12.5 lbs. I am thinking of getting this if it will support my scope. Also, will the mount work with my tripod (CG-4), i heard it will work with the CG-5)
thanks
don c
Thanks Don. The mount would have no trouble holding the weight but the length could be a problem with focusing gitters. I think it would be alright but everybody is little different when it comes to mount tolerances so, if you can, give it try before you buy.
I am unfamiliar with the CG4 tripod so I can't help you there.
#25
Posted 16 January 2009 - 11:31 PM