Alright you PHD guiding experts...
#1
Posted 29 June 2009 - 12:40 AM
I fixed my latitude bolts, the new ones are so much nicer. Guiding seems fine now but 4 times I lost calibration in really good conditions, meaning I had good stars, good skies, the scope and mount is solid tonight but..
PHD failed in RA 3 times with the error "star did not move enough in RA" calibration failed (Or rreally close to that verbage), the last time it failed to calibrate DEC with the same sort of message and stated PHD was "turning off DEC guiding", its guiding outside right now but thinking something isnt right.
Let me know what you experts think, I'm clueless and I cant find anywhere. Thanks for anything, Dan
#2
Posted 29 June 2009 - 01:03 AM
The only thing one can adjust (as far as I know) is the length of those pulses. Click on the brain icon, you should see the pulse length. Try doubling that. That should do the trick. This usually happens with short FL guide scopes. What FL are you guiding with?
#3
Posted 29 June 2009 - 01:39 AM
If polar alignment is off, drift may exceed the movement of the calibration pulses. Also, I've had to adjust the autoguide rates on my CGE to get it to respond to the calibration pulses.
Hope this is of some help.
#4
Posted 29 June 2009 - 02:18 AM
No matter whether I'm pointing to the southern sky or the northern sky the drift is the same in phd, straight up and down, it seems to have the side to side captured as the star stays on that verticle line of the crosshair pretty good. I went all the way up to 1,500 with the stepper settings (500 was default)and I didnt notice any improvement. Unfortunately I had to give up for the night, got work in the morning.
People say to balance a little heavy on the east side, I dont think I'm getting that either, not sure what it means or how it helps. I think I have my cables under control and the weight off of the ota's so I'm not sure if its software settings or my setup. I never did have a grasp on good polar alignment and it should be easy but I never know for sure just how close I really am with that polar alignment scope on the eq6. I just spin it to the approximate position that the program polarfinder shows and put the little circle on the star.. the way I understand I should be close and PHD should guide pretty well from there.
Well, I'm sure I'll get it someday soon with the help around here:-) Thanks guys, Dan
#5
Posted 29 June 2009 - 02:22 AM
You mean in my hand paddle for the mount where there are guide settings? or in the phd software?
I've seen that in there.. All my backlash and pec and any tracking settings are all default from the factory, I'm not brave enough yet lol! Maybe I should step it up one setting whatever that is?
Thanks I appreciate the suggestions!! Dan
#6
Posted 29 June 2009 - 02:25 AM
I stepped it up by double
Sorry, I meant to say I stepped up the number calibration steps from 500 to 1000 and that didnt work so I tried 1500 and that didnt work.
Not sure about RA aggressiveness and all of those settings in phd but its at 100 anyway.
Thanks again. Dan
#7
Posted 29 June 2009 - 02:47 AM
I know it may sound silly, but does the star move at all during calibration? I mean, do you physically see it move in the screen?
#8
Posted 29 June 2009 - 02:52 AM
There is a "Move" command in the Tools section IIRC. Try that. Also while you have the "Brain" symbol open, make sure it is checked to move in both RA and Dec. I guide with an old 50mm finder, minus the eyepiece, with the QHY5 where the eyepiece used to be, so way shorter focal length than you. Most of the time it works, with all the default settings except a bit more calibration steps.
Gary
#9
Posted 29 June 2009 - 03:00 AM
#10
Posted 29 June 2009 - 04:19 AM
#11
Posted 29 June 2009 - 04:31 AM
Hi,
You mean in my hand paddle for the mount where there are guide settings? or in the phd software?
In the hand controller, the default on the CGE was 50, I've cranked it up to 80-90.
You must have decent polar alignment or PHD and/or your mount won't be able to keep up with the drift.
Good Luck!
#12
Posted 29 June 2009 - 04:33 AM
+1 on hot pixel. Happened to me also. With the DSI, it's very easy to mistake.
#13
Posted 29 June 2009 - 06:32 AM
I'm with Fabio on the simple thing first. When you begin calibration do you see the selected star move away from the crosshair center during the calibration process? If not then you need to check some of the basics like cables. I can agree with the hot pixel suggestion too. I have three on my DSI and they've fooled me once or twice.
#14
Posted 29 June 2009 - 07:13 AM
Most likely, you have a bad cable. One other thing, if you are using an ST4 cable, is it the one that came with the DSI? If so, that will not work without modification. I had to swap out one end to make it a cross connect instead of straight through.
#15
Posted 29 June 2009 - 09:43 AM
I'm using GPUSB. Its all relatively new but it could be a bad cable I guess, new doesnt always mean functional as we all know:-) I'll download that port checker and try that.
I havent read anywhere about having to modify the DSI cable but I'm pretty sure I changed cables a few years back with this DSI. I dont even think I bought the usb cable I just had it laying around so its not the original. That could be it too I guess.
Is there anything to read concerning this cable problem with the DSI?
Thanks a lot LLEEGE! Dan
#16
Posted 29 June 2009 - 09:59 AM
About the hot pixel. I did try a few different times to calibrate and with different stars and I get the same thing, mostly the star drifts away (after it is guiding) in the vertical.
When doing the calibration steps I can see the star move out of the crosshairs then back again but mostly only in the horizontal across the screen and not the vertical as much (if any at all). I honestly dont THINK its hot pixels but I've been fooled before and more than once:-)
The first night out it didnt seem to do all of this. The calibration didnt fail and I could have sworn I saw the star move in X and Y both but again, I could be mistaken.
I need to take more notes I can see now. One last thing is, I seem to track a lot better towards the southern or south eastern sky. When looking towards Andromeda (northeast for me)the tracking is worse if that means anything at all. The only reason I'm confident that both axis' are moving is the sound of the motors and my slewing which all seem smooth and ok. Not sure what else I can add right now but if I think of anything I'll post.
Thanks everyone, really appreciate all of this experience! Dan
#17
Posted 29 June 2009 - 09:59 AM
For the GPUSB, it needs to be 1-6, 2-5, 3-4, 4-3, 5-2, 6-1.
I bought some repair ends for Radio shack, cut one end off the cable and replaced it.
#18
Posted 29 June 2009 - 10:05 AM
Steve
#20
Posted 29 June 2009 - 10:17 AM
This sounds like something I can try on my next outing though, thanks Yock! Dan
#21
Posted 29 June 2009 - 10:20 AM
#22
Posted 29 June 2009 - 11:09 AM
Stark Labs Has a Yahoo group
Greg
#23
Posted 29 June 2009 - 11:31 AM
The 2 main things to check for this error is make sure you are not using a hot pixel to guide on and make sure there is a connection between your scope and PHD.
By using a 3x3 mean filter in PHD you can eliminate 90 % of the hot pixels or taking a dark frame to rid them.
Also make sure there is a connection from PHD to the scope.
PHD may have an option to manual guide via buttons and you can confirm that PHD id moving the scope.
Ive been using PHD since it was a baby and have great success with it.
What every problems you are having is very minor and 1 of the 2 suggestions should get you going.
#24
Posted 29 June 2009 - 11:44 AM
Hope this helps.
#25
Posted 29 June 2009 - 05:08 PM
Do you know if this cable can be bought? Some things I dont mind doing but wiring to my camera's I dont really feel like tackling. I will if I have to though of course:-)
How did you identify which wires to switch? I cant find any information about this anywhere. I'm now on starks yahoo group and have the question there but figured while I wait that I could ask you.
Thanks for anything further... Dan









