Posted 12 October 2009 - 09:31 PM
I am using Registax 5.
I cannot find a good description of what wavelets are and how they work.
I have found people who say "Use only level two and three." And one that says "Use a bell shaped curve on them." And more than a dozen that say "Use what works best and looks good."
Can anybody point me to a source for how these things work. Do you start with the sixth slider and come down? Or do you do level one and move up? And why?
PS....I can find nothing worthwhile using the search function here in CN.
Posted 13 October 2009 - 01:16 AM
Sometimes they don't need much adjustment, and other times I shove all six to the far right. It really varies, depending on the object you're imaging and how good the data is.
In a nutshell: It's all trial and error.
Posted 13 October 2009 - 07:23 AM
In the large, I think Paul is correct, it really is trial and error. However, as a rule I start with wavelet levels 3 and 4 and push those up to 10 to see what happens. Depending on results, I then decide if "Initial Layer (IL)" setting should remain at 1 or go up to 2, 3 or even 4. I have noticed there really is no rule for which IL I use and this can vary even on the same camera/web-cam used on the same night.
Anyway, once I have chosen the IL, I then adjust the other sliders but as a rule, I notice my wavelets settings often have a bell-shaped look to them.
It is easy to spend ages fiddling away (and part of the fun) but what I also do is save a few versions of results and open in another image program to view results and then pick best before post-production begins (i.e. levels, contrast, colour, sharpness, de-noising etc)!
All great fun when the image looks a good 'un!
Hope this provides some help,
Posted 13 October 2009 - 08:17 AM
Posted 13 October 2009 - 10:01 AM
My advice, write down what you did as you will want to know how to do it again later after so much fooling around!
Posted 13 October 2009 - 10:37 AM
Posted 13 October 2009 - 02:29 PM
I was beginning to suspect that there would be no firm answer. But why have six sliders if it is all just trial and error?
Can I take it that the lowest level, the sixth slider down, is what happens if you use a larger pixel radius in Photoshop Unsharp Masking, and the highests level (the first slider down) is the same as a smaller pixel radius?
Posted 14 October 2009 - 09:54 AM
What you should do is take a lunar .avi and stack it, then click and hold on the button where the 1.0 appears. Click on the button on the #1 wavelet slider, and then all the way down to #6. Notice how the image of the red and green goes from very grainy and pixelated when you hold down on the 1.0 button on #1, vs the button on #6?
I normally use very little on #1 and #2. It can bring out a noisy and pixelated look to an image. And I use #3-6 quite a bit sometimes. It really, seriously, all depends on what the image can withstand with regards to not overshaprening it.
I once had a jupiter imaging run that was 8 seeing, and budging the #1 slider to a mere 4 brought out the finest details and no more processing was really necessary. On a recent imaging run, I got great Jupiters but I had to push the 3 and 4 sliders over 20, with 1 and 2 set to 3.0 and 5.0.
Its all relative