You could have just said "yes".Which makes me think that you consider LAE and CAE to be more important than FAE or PAE.
I do not evaluate PAE... As far as FAE, I do not check for it...

I keep reading this synopsis but I just can't imagine aligning my scope using just the offset pupil in the XLK+CAM, never looking at PAE and FAE! I'm either not sufficiently adept making the required iterative (and possibly "intuitive") adjustments with the XLK+CAM (probable), or there's something at a fundamental level that's causing me to subliminally reach for my laser when I try to consider limiting myself to alignments other than PAE and FAE (almost certainly). I just don't have your level of confidence--and that might be because we have different visual acuity, different scopes, and/or different thinking when it comes to assessing and correcting axial errors.However, during my initial analysis work I would decollimate then take a photo to evaluate P+3 stack to ensure my flow/tools did in fact yield ~0 FAE.
The point is that if you build confidence by experimentation that PAE and FAE always agree with LAE and CAE then PAE/FAE checking becomes optional...I do not expect others to do the same.