127 mak or 100ED
Posted 08 December 2010 - 12:53 AM
Posted 08 December 2010 - 08:32 AM
The 100ED is a better all-around scope due to its ability to do everything well. It also requires a bit taller mount, but if I were forced to choose, I would go with the 100ED (And I own a 100ED and a 5" SCT with superb optics, so this I am not a refractor bigot at all...I just think that below about 6", a refractor is a better telescope because it is more flexible).
If you get a premium 6" MCT, then that would be a better planetary scope. I owned an MN61 once and it was superb. If the choice were between a 4" APO and a 6" Intes Micro MCT, I would go hands down for the 6" MCT for planets.
Posted 08 December 2010 - 01:48 PM
OK, that's partly in jest, but I have 3 scopes all about the same aperture size (see my signature) and enjoy each of them for different reasons. Vareity is the spice of life.
Posted 08 December 2010 - 02:27 PM
I have both and the ED100 easily VISUALLY outperforms the 127 on the planets.
Plus it cools down quicker too.
The ED100 is amazing value for money, the 127 is a bit disappointing.
Posted 08 December 2010 - 03:07 PM
Details seen in one scope are seen in the other. The ED100 has a better 'snap' to the focus, and a bit sharper image. On double stars, the Mak's bright first diffraction ring often hides dimmer companions.
Both scopes require cooldown when doing high power planetary observing. I've been shocked at the degree of tube currents visible in the ED100 when it's first brought out on a cold night. It stabilizes markedly faster than the 127mm Mak.
While I like them both, I prefer the images in the ED100.
The Mak is comfortably cheaper ($200 less), but not quite enough to make the decision easy on that note alone.
The Synta Maks may have more sample variability than the ED100's, so, if you can swing the +$200, I'd go with the ED100. (It's very rare to hear a complaint about the ED100's (other than the Orion Crayford), but somewhat more common to hear complaints about the Maks.)
They can both be mounted similarly, but the Mak will be much more stable with lower dampening times.
Posted 08 December 2010 - 04:34 PM