Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

R. E. Brandt 6"f13.3 Refractor

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
64 replies to this topic

#51 clamchip

clamchip

    Hubble

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 14,043
  • Joined: 09 Aug 2008

Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:26 AM

From my own close calls with a long focal length 6 inch refractor:

Loosing grip of the OTA when assembling or disassembling on a ladder in the dark.

Forgetting to tighten the tube rings after balancing the OTA and moving the tube to something other than horizontal.

Someone tripping over one of my tripod legs.

I also forget to lock the shafts before I remove the counterweights. At this point the OTA is already removed but if you forget to lock the shafts in place and you remove the counterweights the saddle becomes the heavy part and it pivots around from on top to the bottom of the polar shaft crushing bones and tearing flesh in-route. This is hardest thing for me personally to remember and sometimes I tighten the drive clutch which helps but I don't like upsetting my clutch adjustment.

Robert

#52 amicus sidera

amicus sidera

    Skylab

  • *****
  • In Memoriam
  • Posts: 4,358
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2011

Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:34 AM

Thanks, Robert, I can well envision how those scenarios can lead to damage.

On any refractor over 4" aperture, or EQ reflector over 8", it'd seem like a good idea to either have another set of hands assisting during setup and breakdown (not usually feasible, I know), or a checklist of sorts, mental or otherwise, to keep procedures in their proper order... that, and not hurrying when dealing with such big tubes. Believe me, I've dropped a few OTA's in my time, and it was almost always due to haste on my part.

Keeping a big stick handy to thwart any potential tripod trippers wouldn't hurt, either. :refractor::poke:

#53 tim53

tim53

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 17,406
  • Joined: 17 Dec 2004

Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:55 AM

Here's how: Posted Image

Put the lens and cell on a coolwhip tub (or equivalent, depending on the size of your lens), take the retaining ring off, and lower the cell to the table top around the lens. I suspect mine got chipped by someone trying to put it back in the cell by lowering it, having it get cockeyed when they "let go", since they can't hold onto the lens when it's inside the cell.

This person was likely completely inexperienced, as the two lens elements were not aligned at all, though the alignment marks were plain to be seen. In my pic above, the elements are aligned, which is why the marks from the spacers are double, showing where they were before I realigned the marks.

-Tim.

#54 amicus sidera

amicus sidera

    Skylab

  • *****
  • In Memoriam
  • Posts: 4,358
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2011

Posted 20 July 2012 - 04:03 PM

Interesting, Tim, and I can envision someone trying to drop lens into cell, instead of vice-versa, and getting into trouble.

Incidentally, I was cruising the CN Classifieds when I spotted this neat-looking item:

"Scope-Totes"

I don't know how well they'd prevent refractor disasters like dropping the tube, but it seems like they might work fairly well, if you're decently strong.

Attractive young lady holding that big OTA, as well. :cool:

#55 clamchip

clamchip

    Hubble

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 14,043
  • Joined: 09 Aug 2008

Posted 20 July 2012 - 04:12 PM

I have a graph comparison of Brandt correction, if someone can tell us anything from this about the lens design. It may not be a Fraunhofer. Corrected for visual range 5100-6500A. I don't know if this information is scientific data or advertising?
I do want to try stopping down the lens to 5" and post the results.

Attached Thumbnails

  • 5327215-Brandt0001.JPG


#56 clamchip

clamchip

    Hubble

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 14,043
  • Joined: 09 Aug 2008

Posted 20 July 2012 - 04:49 PM

Scope-Totes looks like a good idea! :applause:

Robert

#57 clintwhitman

clintwhitman

    Caveman

  • *****
  • Posts: 5,852
  • Joined: 01 Jan 2007

Posted 21 July 2012 - 07:02 AM

Tim where is the tissue for the cool whip tub top? :foreheadslap: :roflmao:
The 9" triplet on a 1 gallon Change jug full of change. with puffs tissues taped to the top.... LOL

Attached Thumbnails

  • 5327878-9 RePadding 2.jpg


#58 tim53

tim53

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 17,406
  • Joined: 17 Dec 2004

Posted 21 July 2012 - 09:13 AM

Hey, my cool whip tub was clean, and it's softer than glass!

-Tim.

#59 amicus sidera

amicus sidera

    Skylab

  • *****
  • In Memoriam
  • Posts: 4,358
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2011

Posted 21 July 2012 - 09:23 AM

Tim where is the tissue for the cool whip tub top? :foreheadslap: :roflmao:
The 9" triplet on a 1 gallon Change jug full of change. with puffs tissues taped to the top.... LOL


OMG, it's The Pearl, all nekkid! :grin:

#60 clintwhitman

clintwhitman

    Caveman

  • *****
  • Posts: 5,852
  • Joined: 01 Jan 2007

Posted 22 July 2012 - 04:28 AM

Fred,
Did you note how thick the center lens is? The total thickness is over 3" Shes got some junk in her trunk!!
:yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :applause:

#61 clintwhitman

clintwhitman

    Caveman

  • *****
  • Posts: 5,852
  • Joined: 01 Jan 2007

Posted 22 July 2012 - 04:31 AM

Hey, my cool whip tub was clean, and it's softer than glass!

-Tim.

Might be softer than glass but coatings are not glass and vary widely in hardness. Better soft than sleeky!! :foreheadslap:

#62 amicus sidera

amicus sidera

    Skylab

  • *****
  • In Memoriam
  • Posts: 4,358
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2011

Posted 22 July 2012 - 07:52 AM

Yessir, Clint, that is one impressive lens!

:yay: :yay: :yay:, indeed!

Happy is the man who possesses such glass... :cool:

#63 clamchip

clamchip

    Hubble

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 14,043
  • Joined: 09 Aug 2008

Posted 22 July 2012 - 11:11 AM

Yes it sure is an awesome hunk Clint! and no clam chips!

Robert

#64 PhilCo126

PhilCo126

    Soyuz

  • -----
  • Posts: 3,858
  • Joined: 14 Jan 2005

Posted 26 July 2012 - 08:34 AM

Superb refractor and an amazing project. I hope this book could elaborate a bit about the spacing between lens elements:
Classic Telescopes: A Guide to Collecting, Restoring, and Using Telescopes of Yesteryear ( By Neil English = known author from the Patrick Moore's Practical Astronomy Series )

:p

#65 clamchip

clamchip

    Hubble

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 14,043
  • Joined: 09 Aug 2008

Posted 26 July 2012 - 10:15 AM

Thanks for reminding me about that book. I meant to order one when it first printed but somehow forgot.

Robert


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics