
Soviet Tair-3 300mm f/4.5 lens as Astrograph tests
#51
Posted 13 May 2012 - 10:32 PM
I am thinking of using this lens for Venus transit, may even try with my 12nm Ha filter!
Alex
#52
Posted 13 May 2012 - 11:51 PM
#53
Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:51 AM
#54
Posted 14 May 2012 - 05:02 AM
Erik: Ya, I am rather happy about this too


#55
Posted 14 May 2012 - 08:15 PM
Is there any downside to going dual Tair with a modded T3i and an unmodded D7000? The Nikon will be less sensitive to red of course but any thoughts if this would be viable when combining data from each? I don't have a clip-in Ha yet but could play with 2x RGB for the time being. Also need to get it mounted up on CG5.
Best,
George
#56
Posted 20 May 2012 - 05:51 AM
in your setup how do your perform multiple star alignment with the Ha filter on?
I have clip-on filters and it is just not possible to do that.
#57
Posted 20 May 2012 - 03:36 PM
- make sure the Tair-3 is *securely* attached to the mount
- Attach the camera to the Tair-3 without the clip-in Ha filter installed and make sure the mount is balanced
- with the mount still not powered on I use a terestrial reffrence object (distant tree, hill, tower, light, whatever) to align the guide-scope and camera so both have the same center point.
- Remove the camera from the lens (but not the lens from the mount!) and install the clip-in filter
- Power on the mount, turn on PHD, turn on the bulls-eye overlay in PHD, set PHD to 1s exposure cycling and use *that* view to do my mount align.
That method worked very well for me. last thing I do is slew to something very bright like Vega or Arcturus and use a bahtinov mask and 30s exposures to nail the focus. At that point I am ready to slew to my target and image!
#58
Posted 23 May 2012 - 12:18 AM
The full kit.
So... ya - guess I can do a Tair-3a vs Tair-3s comparison now!
My quick impression is that there is much less slop in the 3s then the 3a - though that might be related to the near-mint condition of the 3s and the "well used" condition of my 3a I think it has just as much to do with the fact that much less of the lens itself is designed to shift in/out.
My totally un-rigours comparison so far is:
Tair-3a Pros:
- can focus much closer (not much use for astro I know, but still!)
- Has built-in lens shade
- Has tripod collar (can rotate orientation easily!)
Tair-3s Pros:
- MUCH sturdier/tighter build (no visible shift in components when "wiggled")
- Can be used with rings for more stable astro-configuration.
- That *BLEEP* and trigger-release aperture mechanism is just plain cool

I have a feeling that the Tair-3s is the superior version for AP-focused work. I have not compared their optical performance (expecting similar or identical results) and more crucially have not tested how easy it is to reach critical focus with that funky focus dial mechanism.
Edit: hah - gota love censoring filters... no concept of context

#59
Posted 23 May 2012 - 12:28 AM
#60
Posted 23 May 2012 - 07:07 AM
George
#61
Posted 23 May 2012 - 12:44 PM

#62
Posted 23 May 2012 - 01:21 PM
http://www.astrobin....11553/?mod=none
#63
Posted 23 May 2012 - 03:21 PM

Erik & Chris: Ya, the pistol/rifle stock mount *does* make it a lot easier to get a steady shot with that monster heavy lens then simply hand-held would. Tripod is of course better, but much less portable. I suspect image stabilization would be better then the gun grip of course... but that is hardly what these lenses are about.
Only problem is.... not many situations I can think of where I can use that mount without causing great consternation!
George: Could you post a picture of your 3c and 3s next to each other here? I am going to do the same with my 3a and 3s when I get the chance next weekend...
#64
Posted 24 May 2012 - 05:31 AM
I will take some pics this weekend and post here.
George
#66
Posted 27 May 2012 - 08:44 PM
Notice on the Tair-3a the front 3/4 of the lens moves - everything in front of the tripod collar. This is why rings would be difficult for the 3a.
Also notice that the 3a has quite a lot more movement - this means the 3a can focus on things MUCH closer then the 3s.
#67
Posted 27 May 2012 - 08:46 PM
My only concept of dating on these two lenses is that the the 3a has a label saying it was made in the USSR while this one (as you can sorta see here) was "made in Russia".
#68
Posted 28 May 2012 - 04:09 PM
Does anyone know how to adjust the lens focus for infinity?
#69
Posted 28 May 2012 - 04:53 PM
#70
Posted 28 May 2012 - 05:07 PM
1. remove collar
2. under collar, you will find a screw which needs to be removed
That's it!
YMMV: I see a huge variation of this lens design.
My lens looks like this (it seems to be the original design) :
http://www.dreamstim...58-image7934486
Alex
Alex
#71
Posted 28 May 2012 - 05:22 PM
#72
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:04 PM
Should I focus in a bit?
#73
Posted 29 May 2012 - 06:07 PM
#74
Posted 29 May 2012 - 06:07 PM
It is much simpler if you do narrowband imaging because you focus only one wavelength.
Alex