Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

17 sec (x1024) Camera Sony 960h Exview HAD CCD2

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
494 replies to this topic

#76 James Cunningham

James Cunningham

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4056
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 04:28 AM

Was this at 17 seconds? It could use some cooling.

#77 James Cunningham

James Cunningham

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4056
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 04:32 AM

What kind of filter did you have on the camera. It looks like it could benefit from an Astronomik light pollution filter. That would darker the sky back round.

#78 James Cunningham

James Cunningham

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4056
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 04:33 AM

Sens Up to "off" is the same as on the Samsung 2000 camera.

#79 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 08:39 AM

Was this at 17 seconds? It could use some cooling.


Swan was less than one sec. the trifid was slightly over one sec.

#80 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 08:42 AM

What kind of filter did you have on the camera. It looks like it could benefit from an Astronomik light pollution filter. That would darker the sky back round.


celestron uhc

#81 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 09:29 AM

Well done Hemmi for 1st DSO pics - looks very promising and manual shutter afterall say Scout :jump:

Did a quick test of your [boosted] M20 against Megastar and its down to mag 12.6 and pretty clean from hot pixels - M21 OC top left :rainbow:


Not bad for 1 sec, but the images seem to be really grainy. Need more testing to see if that can be cleared up. I never got anywhere near x1024 with the moon out..anything over 1 sec was a total wash. But the amount of light this thing pulled in a such short exposures was excellent. I'm gonna postpone judgement on this camera till I can test it more. The graininess is my real concern at the momment.

#82 mclewis1

mclewis1

    Thread Killer

  • *****
  • Posts: 19236
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2006

Posted 30 June 2012 - 09:40 AM

For around a second and with a UHC filter that is indeed impressive sensitivity ... but with that much noise ... yikes. As Maurice pointed out though they are quite smooth over all and without nasty hot pixels and such the images will very likely benefit greatly from stacking and a DIY cooling kit.

How fast is your scope setup?

#83 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 09:41 AM

one last note...I saw no difference with 3d-dnr all the way up and off, which leads me to believe it was not working. Maybe there is a setting that is preventing it from working correctly, or its just not good enough...More testing is required to be certain.

#84 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 09:42 AM

For around a second and with a UHC filter that is indeed impressive sensitivity ... but with that much noise ... yikes. As Maurice pointed out though they are quite smooth over all and without nasty hot pixels and such the images will very likely benefit greatly from stacking and a DIY cooling kit.

How fast is your scope setup?


F6 ED with a .5 reducer...so ~f3

#85 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 11:26 AM

Playing around with the camera this morning, I discovered that if you set the exposure mode to WDR you get much less grain. I turned WDR to max and 3d-DNR to max. With the cam cover on, I could crank it up to 1024 acg high, and the noise level was not very bad. I will need to test this under the stars, but maybe this will be much better.

Also got wireless rs-485 working with the OSD. So that will help speed the testing.

#86 James Cunningham

James Cunningham

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4056
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 11:41 AM

What is the wireless rs-485 thing?

#87 Raginar

Raginar

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 9411
  • Joined: 19 Oct 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 11:52 AM

Hemmi,

Do you have any pictures from last night with the new-better settings?

#88 jambi99

jambi99

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 374
  • Joined: 14 Aug 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 12:29 PM

Sounds good! Thank Hemmi and Scout.

#89 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 12:50 PM

Hemmi,


Do you have any pictures from last night with the new-better settings?


No and it won't be for a few days at least. 108 degrees here today

#90 Raginar

Raginar

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 9411
  • Joined: 19 Oct 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 01:46 PM

Yikes :)

#91 mpgxsvcd

mpgxsvcd

    Vanguard

  • -----
  • Posts: 2056
  • Joined: 21 Dec 2011

Posted 30 June 2012 - 05:10 PM

Was this at 17 seconds? It could use some cooling.


Swan was less than one sec. the trifid was slightly over one sec.


That is amazing. Great job with these. I can vouch for the conditions as well. Seeing and Transparency were terrible last night with the moon out as well.

Pretty much the worst conditions I have ever tried to observe in.

Based on those shots I would say this thing could be really good. Less than 1 sec is very fast for those objects to show up at all.

What monitor are you using with it?

#92 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 06:08 PM

I use a netbook for viewing

#93 scout72

scout72

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1208
  • Joined: 12 May 2008

Posted 30 June 2012 - 06:51 PM

I was out for a bit last night with this cam as well- went straight for m51 as I am fairly familiar with what the sdc-435/scb-2000 looks like with same scope at 10 seconds (PAL) c-8 at f3.8ish- and it is a pretty difficult object- even without poor seeing and bright moon :-) Anyway- my impressions were :too noisy!!

Also- I still have the stock filter on camera- but can confirm it is NOT true ICR/mechanical which is a bummer.

I tried many different setting - at 20 seconds it was almost completely washed out in noise- I didn't try WDR but will get there too- anyway- I could tell that the signal/data was there- the spiral arm structure and companion were there- just not useable- I tried all of the gain settings and tried dialing back the exposure and it was either too much noise or not enough exposure. I plan on testing additional settings and possibly other filters if I get my stock one off tonight.

I was able to cut back the noise a bit with the brightness control dialed back but could't get a real good result yet- ie less noise but still enough detail.

The menus are pretty funky on this one- you have to go through a kind of reset any time you make changes to the settings to save them.

#94 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 30 June 2012 - 08:47 PM

I agree with the noise. If we cant figure out how to dial it back, then the camera will not be very good for live viewing. When I get time I will attempt to use it with with a live stacking program to see if stacking will reduce the noise.

What we need is Samsung to release a camera with this chip, as it seems Samsung has the best noise canceling out there.

I still have alot of testing to do, and still think that there may be more that can be done for the noise. I still want to try WDR and also with the the AGC settings.

#95 Dragon Man

Dragon Man

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3383
  • Joined: 07 Mar 2006

Posted 02 July 2012 - 07:27 AM

Thanks for the results so far Lee :waytogo:

#96 James Cunningham

James Cunningham

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4056
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2010

Posted 03 July 2012 - 06:30 AM

How long did it take for you to get your camera? I ordered mine on 6/26 and it looks like its still in Hong Kong.

#97 jambi99

jambi99

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • Posts: 374
  • Joined: 14 Aug 2010

Posted 03 July 2012 - 10:09 AM

Mine too. Its seems that aliexpress tracking system is not very reliable.They gave me a tracking number but it does not provide me any details other than it was shipped from Hong Kong.

#98 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:58 PM

I paid extra for DHL express. If you used free shipping, expect it in a month.

#99 Hemmi

Hemmi

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 283
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2010

Posted 03 July 2012 - 04:10 PM

There happens to be 1/32 space under the sensor on my camera, so I made a cold finger out of aluminum to cool the sensor. The cold finger is installed but waiting on a peltier and heatsink.

I just want to see if I can clean up some of this noise.

I will update if and when I get a chance to complete it.

#100 James Cunningham

James Cunningham

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4056
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2010

Posted 03 July 2012 - 04:14 PM

All the noise that is on the image - did that come right away or after exposing for a while?


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics