Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

I Think I have made up my mind, C-9,25 and C-11

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
14 replies to this topic

#1 Benjamin B

Benjamin B

    Apollo

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 1211
  • Joined: 21 Jun 2004

Posted 05 September 2005 - 12:59 PM

Well, here I go again. Here is the plan...

I´m going to buy me a Celestron...

I have two choices, The C-9,25 and the C-11. If I find a good C-11 used and can buy it from a good Rated user at astromart I will buy one. And if I don't find one, I will buy a C-9,25 new.
What do you guys think of this plan

:grin:

#2 Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*

Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*
  • -----

Posted 05 September 2005 - 03:22 PM

Whew... you said "and" in the title, thought you were getting both :lol:

I'd say get the new scope, unless you can visually test out the C11 up close and star test it.

#3 Rusty

Rusty

    ISS

  • *****
  • In Memoriam
  • Posts: 22761
  • Joined: 06 Aug 2003

Posted 05 September 2005 - 06:26 PM

There are pros and cons to either new or used. Most used scopes have had the bugs worked out of them by the prior owners (and some have accumulated new ills). One unfortunate CNer has sent her N9.25" back and forth to Celestron at least four times, and it's coming back worse each time, so "new" doesn't necessarily dispense with problems.

#4 Paul Romero

Paul Romero

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 977
  • Joined: 05 Apr 2005

Posted 05 September 2005 - 07:14 PM

Hi,

I would buy that C14 CGE scope with all the accessores. Theres one up at Astromart now with all the bells and wistles for $5500. My C11 is all I need, but if it was not there, I would go for this one.

Paul

#5 Benjamin B

Benjamin B

    Apollo

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 1211
  • Joined: 21 Jun 2004

Posted 06 September 2005 - 12:20 AM

Well, a C-14 would be nice, but to big for me right now. I only need the OTA. why would it be that bad to buy a used OTA?

#6 jfaaz

jfaaz

    Messenger

  • -----
  • Posts: 445
  • Joined: 13 May 2004

Posted 06 September 2005 - 09:24 AM

Go with a new 9.25.

It weighs less.

#7 JerryWise

JerryWise

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 9686
  • Joined: 26 Dec 2003

Posted 06 September 2005 - 10:27 AM


I've got both the C-14 and C-9.25 and use a CGE mount. Guess what.... the 9.25 stays on the mount most of the time. Every now and again I'll mount that monster C-14 and put a camera on it. Astrophotography is so much more difficult with a longer FL scope. Off it comes and the C-9.25 goes back on. Both were bought used. The 9.25 was perfect. The C-14 needed a lot of work. Now I want to put an XLT corrector in the thing. Only 1,600 more dollars (estimate from Celestron).

Over the last 3 years I've had a 10" LX200, 14" LX200 and the Celestrons. Trying to find the perfect scope. I keep going back to and using the 9.25" to 10" OTAs. They just work out better all the way around for me. (Considering seeing, location, preferences, etc.)

I think the smartest part of your equation is getting the G11. Then you can play with the OTAs until you are happy.

#8 Benjamin B

Benjamin B

    Apollo

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 1211
  • Joined: 21 Jun 2004

Posted 07 September 2005 - 01:54 AM

I want to see DSO, are the C-9,25 big enough? How about the C11? I do already have the G11, a great mount! :jump:

#9 Eddy

Eddy

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1355
  • Joined: 30 Sep 2004

Posted 07 September 2005 - 05:01 AM

You'll see DSO with both. I do have a C8 and it does a fine job as well. But in order to see more detail, aperture will win... So you'll have to go for the C11. It is about the same weight as the C9.25, but you will gain more light. On the G11, it won't be a problem having a heavy SCT like the C11, even for astrophotography.
The only negative thing with larger scopes is that they are more “influenced” by bad seeing than smaller ones…
Anyway whichever you choose, they are both very nice scopes.
Just my 2 Eurocents...
Cheers,

#10 Benjamin B

Benjamin B

    Apollo

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 1211
  • Joined: 21 Jun 2004

Posted 07 September 2005 - 05:05 AM

Would it be the same in bad “influenced” by both C-9,25 and C-11?

#11 JerryWise

JerryWise

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 9686
  • Joined: 26 Dec 2003

Posted 07 September 2005 - 07:44 AM


From my experience the Focal Length determines the sensitivity to "seeing" conditions. Last night it was windy here. The 9.25 would star trail a bit if hit by a gust during time exposure. I had a Tak 4" mounted beside it (Losmandy dual plate) and when the wind picked up it started star trailing and "blobbing" the stars too. So off it came and a little $150 "Shorty" achromatic scope went on. Wind blew and the Shorty took fine widefield images. If the C14 or a C11 had been mounted it would have been a short night. The longer FL OTAs generally mag more and will be influenced more by conditions. But then again, you won’t get a stunning M2 for this months camera contest with a Shorty 80.

#12 Benjamin B

Benjamin B

    Apollo

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 1211
  • Joined: 21 Jun 2004

Posted 07 September 2005 - 08:28 AM

hehe,

How was your RCX400? If you compare them with your other scopes?

#13 JerryWise

JerryWise

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 9686
  • Joined: 26 Dec 2003

Posted 07 September 2005 - 09:39 AM


It's just a personal opinion but the RCX has refractor like visual views. Take the Tak FS102 and make it a lot bigger and give it a ton of features with a built in mount and you have an idea of the RCX. (SRF note: side by side with the Tak and Meade 102ED the RCX optics when collimated are a doozie of a good system.) Sharp optics and a spot on GOTO. It is a new system and so you expect bugs. I found one.

Either EQ or Forks works fine for me. Just glad to have good equipment.

#14 Benjamin B

Benjamin B

    Apollo

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 1211
  • Joined: 21 Jun 2004

Posted 07 September 2005 - 09:53 AM

It wood be nice with a RCX400 OTA, but I wonder if the G11 would hold it :-)
I had a Meade LX200 10" GPS, but found trouble with the software and the electronic focuser just died. Never got the GPS to work. To much electronic. The RCX looks great on the paper, but all that electronic makes me not to buy one. But I would like to have one :-)

#15 Rusty

Rusty

    ISS

  • *****
  • In Memoriam
  • Posts: 22761
  • Joined: 06 Aug 2003

Posted 07 September 2005 - 07:54 PM

Unfortunately, the RCX is unlikely to be offered as an OTA, as it's essentially an integrated system...


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics