Planning a folded open 8.5" f/12.5 refractor
#1
Posted 19 January 2013 - 08:42 PM
I recently acquired an old D&G 8.5" f/12.5 achromatic doublet and wanted to make a open truss pole folded refractor so I can easily mount this on a midsized GEM. This is just a preliminary sketch but it looks like I will need a 6" optical flat in the first mirror, but if I undersize it to 5" diameter will I get the same effect as masking the lens objective down to 7"? This would make it an f/15 instrument with significantly better colour correction. Or do I still have to mask the lens down to 7" as well?
#2
Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:19 PM
#3
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:17 AM
You may want to use a flat larger than 6" to maintain a reasonably large fully illuminated field of view. An open folded refractor is a neat idea. I don't see how you'll be able to mount this onto a GEM, unless you're going to have a plate that runs the length of the instrument (about 3 feet) which would then attach to the GEM. It would be interesting to experiment with an open vs. closed tube to see which gives you better seeing. One way to do this is to make a light weight shell (thin wood, sheet metal, cardboard) that you could easily put on and remove. Don't forget to add baffles, especially something to avoid a straight shot from the objective lens to the focuser.
Cheers
Mike
#5
Posted 20 January 2013 - 07:08 AM
I also think that a solid tube would allow better baffling and should be considered.
JimC
#6
Posted 20 January 2013 - 07:47 AM
why not build a dobsonian-style mount that uses just one fold mirror?
I also think that a solid tube would allow better baffling and should be considered.
JimC
Our 6" f/15 folded triplet is such an arrangement. A 6" flat is used, but only 3" is utilized. Looks like an 8" f/6 dob.
Not very elegant looking, but planetary views are unforgettable.
#7
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:34 AM
Not really. There will be some improvement in the secondary color but I don't think I would call it significant. Both the 8.5" and 7" configurations are going to show visible color on bright targets like Jupiter and the moon. Niether are going to show much color on targets like M13 or M31. If you were to stop the lens down to 4" it then approaches apo performance with nearly all visible light in the airy disk but that is a huge scarifice of aperature.
You need to use good flats for folding and preferably, they need to be larger than the minimum size for full illumination. Any errors in the flats will likely be at the edges so the use of an oversize flat will keep the edges out of the light path. I also think the lower flat will need to have some sort of shield to prevent dew.
Good luck with your project. You are making a great scope. I hope it all turns out well and I get a chance to look through it real soon.
dan
#8
Posted 21 January 2013 - 12:15 AM
#9
Posted 18 May 2013 - 03:53 PM
I've got the plywood bulkheads cut with baffles that will hopefully preserve the open nature of the OTA design. I used aluminum tubing from a place that sells it for making shortwave radio antennae masts and the struts expand from 2 feet to 3 feet with self locking buttons. Waiting for my 3 & 6" optical flats to be coated. Has a very solid oak base straddling one of the struts where I intend to mount a very long Losmandy style dovetail plate as it is quite nose heavy, although the 2" thick 6 inch optical flat at the rear will help.
#10
Posted 18 May 2013 - 05:24 PM
JimC
#11
Posted 19 May 2013 - 03:58 PM
Can I ask where you got the telescoping tubes with button locks (thinking about dob struts)?
#12
Posted 20 May 2013 - 09:46 AM
JimC, unfortunately as you will see I installed a black JMI EV motorized focuser so I have the option of doing some planetary imaging.
Catboat, the tube connector buttons can be bought from McMaster Carr and the tubing from Maple Leaf Communications.
We're celebrating Queen Victoria's birthday today (Monday) so I used the bonus free time to install the 3" optical flat holder, Losmandy dovetail plate and focuser and tried it on my AP400GTO mount. Hmmm, much more intimadating than I expected!
#13
Posted 24 May 2013 - 08:28 PM
I'm concerned that the dovetail attachment is not robust enough to support the weight of the scope once the lens cell is attached, literally tearing away from the structure so I got some 1/4" angle aluminum and attached the middle bulkheads directly to the Losmandy dovetail bar.
#14
Posted 26 May 2013 - 11:19 PM
#15
Posted 27 May 2013 - 09:25 PM
#16
Posted 29 May 2013 - 08:03 PM
#17
Posted 30 May 2013 - 07:45 AM
dan
#19
Posted 31 May 2013 - 06:52 AM
JimC
#20
Posted 31 May 2013 - 04:23 PM
I recently built a 127mm f/9.4 folded refractor, using a thin plywood skin around a light wood frame. Most of the mass was in the objective and the focuser, so in the end I didn't save any weight, but the shorter scope was far easier to live with.
#21
Posted 31 May 2013 - 08:15 PM
I collimated the scope this evening, centered my Hotech Newtonian laser collimator into each mirror one at a time, first adjusting the focuser to be centered on the 3" optical flat. The lens cell has push pull hex screws so I adjusted the cells until the reflection from the posterior element reflected right back to the laser collimator. Now waiting for the rain to stop!
#22
Posted 01 June 2013 - 11:16 AM
Still I mounted the beast (and it is, needed my wife to give me a hand) and aimed it at some distant apartment buildings. Focus appears sharp! Will have to wait until nighttime but the open nature of the scope even in daytime did not exhibit any off axis light contamination.
Jim
#24
Posted 01 June 2013 - 03:53 PM
#25
Posted 02 June 2013 - 07:36 AM
Oooohhh neato but weird lookin' too!
Can't wait for your visual testing.
Mike
You're gonna have to wait! JIm has brought the new scope curse upon us in very big way! As soon as he mounted the mirrors the forecast went from partly cloudy to non-stop rain, rain and more rain. Based on the size of that scope the curse will probably last until November!
dan








