Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Takitis!

  • Please log in to reply
3077 replies to this topic

#26 Paul G

Paul G

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 8561
  • Joined: 08 May 2003
  • Loc: Freedonia

Posted 01 July 2014 - 11:27 AM

I have the Elite Bug Shirt and pants, 100% effective against mosquitoes. Looks a little goofy but who cares. I use the microfiber version because of the heat and humidity here, cooler than the cotton.
  • moshen likes this

#27 NHRob

NHRob

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 27 Aug 2004
  • Loc: Southern Cloud-Hampshire

Posted 01 July 2014 - 12:08 PM




Hey Rob, dibs if you decide to sell it!

Just kidding, congrats on a fine telescope. I've owned one in the past, and can tell you that it's a fine instrument. Beware though, it may lead to the purchase of an FS-128!


No Tak for you !!

Attached Thumbnails

  • 6611202-soup nazi.jpg


#28 Doug Culbertson

Doug Culbertson

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 7652
  • Joined: 06 Jan 2005
  • Loc: N. Florida

Posted 01 July 2014 - 12:36 PM



Hey Rob, dibs if you decide to sell it!

Just kidding, congrats on a fine telescope. I've owned one in the past, and can tell you that it's a fine instrument. Beware though, it may lead to the purchase of an FS-128!


No Tak for you !!


Awesome Seinfeld reference! :bow:

#29 peleuba

peleuba

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1886
  • Joined: 01 Dec 2004
  • Loc: North of Baltimore, MD

Posted 01 July 2014 - 03:53 PM

I have the Elite Bug Shirt and pants, 100% effective against mosquitoes. Looks a little goofy but who cares. I use the microfiber version because of the heat and humidity here, cooler than the cotton.



I purchased the shirt and pants at your suggestion a few years back after reading another complimentary post that you made. These are awesome and really work. Just had it at Cherry Springs last week.
  • Paul G likes this

#30 waso29

waso29

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1390
  • Joined: 12 May 2010
  • Loc: Chi-Town, mother earth

Posted 01 July 2014 - 09:50 PM

the disease is spreading.....

Attached Thumbnails

  • 6612194-takitis.JPG

  • jrs, Bomber Bob, charotarguy and 1 other like this

#31 Olee

Olee

    Explorer 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 97
  • Joined: 01 May 2013

Posted 02 July 2014 - 03:24 PM

I'm feeling Tak green with envy!!

#32 NHRob

NHRob

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 27 Aug 2004
  • Loc: Southern Cloud-Hampshire

Posted 29 July 2014 - 07:03 AM

Well, life is not cooperating. Very bad weather and the few good nights, other life stuff got in the way. Still hopeful to compare soon.

BTW, I have a lead on a used FS-128. Would I be crazy to sell off both these 4" apes and get the FS-128? I'm thinking about it.

CS,
Rob

#33 tomcody

tomcody

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2509
  • Joined: 06 Jul 2008
  • Loc: Titusville, Florida

Posted 29 July 2014 - 08:22 AM

Rob,
The FS128 is definitely a step up from the FS102 ( I sold both my FS102 and TSA 102 after buying the FS128), but the FS128 is a much bigger scope ( only weighs about 17 lb) but it is long and make sure you have a mount that can handle it with the tripod extended for good viewing height.
Also it is not exactly grab and go so plan on a little more setup/ transport issues with a matching mount. But it is a keeper scope, I got one after selling my AP130GT and would never go back to the AP!
Rex
  • Scott in NC likes this

#34 Allan Wade

Allan Wade

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4021
  • Joined: 27 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Newcastle, Australia

Posted 29 July 2014 - 08:23 AM

What is fair market value for the FS scopes these days?

#35 Allan Wade

Allan Wade

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4021
  • Joined: 27 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Newcastle, Australia

Posted 29 July 2014 - 08:29 AM

I got one after selling my AP130GT and would never go back to the AP!


Rex, that is very high praise for the FS128, must be some great telescope

#36 tomcody

tomcody

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2509
  • Joined: 06 Jul 2008
  • Loc: Titusville, Florida

Posted 29 July 2014 - 10:07 AM

IMO the FS128 and AP130GT are different scopes, the AP is very fast and has to much curvature in the FOV for my tastes, don't get me wrong, it is a very high quality lens that resolves such targets as the moons of Jupiter , Uranus and Neptune as well as any scope out there, but for me the flatter FOV of the FS128 is more natural.
I think that Astro Physics had photography and binoviewing in mind on that design, you can pair it with a MarkV binoviewer and have one of the best bino friendly scopes made, ( as the recommended 1.25x GPC extends the FR to a more natural F8), and if I were into binoviewing, I might own one, but for mono, I Prefer the FS128.
Rex

#37 crazyqban

crazyqban

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
  • Joined: 16 Dec 2008
  • Loc: Miami, Florida

Posted 29 July 2014 - 06:12 PM

I had a Tak FS-102 that I sold to purchase a Tak FS-128 which I will be selling because I just acquired a Tak FS-152 (should be arriving soon). When I had the FS-102, I purchased a TSA-120 with the intention of replacing the FS-102 but found them to be very close so I sold the TSA-120 and kept the FS-102. Shortly after that, someone that I know locally aqcuired an FS-128 and I told him that if he decides to sell it to hit me up first. Less than a month later I ended up with an FS-102 and an FS-128. The jump up from the FS-102 to the FS-128 was much more noticeable and pleasing than the jump from the FS-102 to the TSA-120 and thus I thought that the FS-128 would be where my refractor quest would cease. Then someone told me that the FS-152 is not much longer (8 to 10 inches) than the FS-128 and this marinated in my mind until a couple of weeks ago that I saw a Tak FS-152 SV for sale and jumped on the opportunity. No I am waiting for the FS-152 to be delivered and will hopefully get a chance to compare both scopes side by side. Believe it or not I do consider my FS-128/DM6 combo a brab-n-go. I have had many small grab-n-go setups but I just did not find the views very pleasing especially when compared to my 16" F4 dob. With the FS-128/DM6 combo, I grab the tripod with the mount and set it outside, then grab the light weight OTA, wait a few minuted for cool down and voila, wonderful views. I hope to be doing the same with the FS-152. Although this would not be the definition of a grab-n-go system, the little bit of extra effort is very worth it in my opinion.
  • Tyson M likes this

#38 tomcody

tomcody

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2509
  • Joined: 06 Jul 2008
  • Loc: Titusville, Florida

Posted 29 July 2014 - 08:33 PM

Sergio,
I agree that the FS128/DM6 combo is great and I think that the FS152/ DM6 will be just as good ( and portable) with the right tripod ( maybe something a little taller? than needed for the FS128?).
Rex

#39 crazyqban

crazyqban

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
  • Joined: 16 Dec 2008
  • Loc: Miami, Florida

Posted 29 July 2014 - 08:40 PM

I am currently using a double clamped Berlebach UNI 24 extended about 10 inches with the FS-128/DM6 combo with great results. I will raise it a bit more and see how it works with the FS-152. If it does not work well the I will probably have to get a Berlebach Planet or Losmandy HD.

#40 Allan Wade

Allan Wade

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4021
  • Joined: 27 Jan 2013
  • Loc: Newcastle, Australia

Posted 29 July 2014 - 11:08 PM

I have noticed the Losmandy HD and pier extension is a popular setup with the DM6. I imagine it would certainly be rock solid.

#41 crazyqban

crazyqban

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
  • Joined: 16 Dec 2008
  • Loc: Miami, Florida

Posted 29 July 2014 - 11:44 PM

I used to have one with my old TOA-130F and it was excellent. But I like the look of the Berlebachs more.

#42 t.r.

t.r.

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6082
  • Joined: 14 Feb 2008
  • Loc: 1123,6536,5321

Posted 30 July 2014 - 06:48 AM

Rob, you and I discussed long ago that a 5" is thee "sweet spot" in our neck of the woods...HECK YEAH, get the Tak FS128!!! It was your long range plan to settle in with a 5" anyway, do it now, life is too short. Then we'll get together and shoot out my AP130GT and your FS128 and see if Markab is full of it or not! :p

#43 roadi

roadi

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Joined: 18 Aug 2007
  • Loc: Denmark

Posted 30 July 2014 - 07:19 AM

the disease is spreading.....


You do have a severe attack of Takitis :shocked:
How do you feel?? :question:

#44 waso29

waso29

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1390
  • Joined: 12 May 2010
  • Loc: Chi-Town, mother earth

Posted 30 July 2014 - 07:33 AM

i feel like looking for a mt160 to convert to dob or maybe try cn212....

#45 roadi

roadi

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Joined: 18 Aug 2007
  • Loc: Denmark

Posted 30 July 2014 - 07:54 AM

i feel like looking for a mt160 to convert to dob or maybe try cn212....


:grin:
Oh.. This is serious! Guess theres no cure for you.. God bless you

#46 NHRob

NHRob

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 27 Aug 2004
  • Loc: Southern Cloud-Hampshire

Posted 30 July 2014 - 07:58 AM

Hi Tim,
I decided to hold off and spend more time with my FS-102. The FS-128 looks nice but, I'd have to upgrade my mount as well to handle it.


Rob

#47 roadi

roadi

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Joined: 18 Aug 2007
  • Loc: Denmark

Posted 30 July 2014 - 08:02 AM

No, it's not an inflammation of your Takahashi! :jawdrop:

Instead, I picked up a used FS-102 on AMart and will be doing visual comparisons against my SV-105T as soon as I can. The Tak should arrive today/tomorrow. I have a MT Pro and I'll see if I can mount both scopes together for doing side-by-sides! :jump:

Only issue is that the FS has only 1.25" visual back and I only have a 2" diagonal. Oh well, I might have to view straight through to compare. :rainbow:

Stay tuned ... pics will be provided when I can.


Rob, to get the best out of the FS102 you should get a high quality diagonal, preferable a high quality prism.
Should the Tak be the better one you probably won't see it with a mediocre (most dielectric) diagonals.
I've seen this many times with various diagonals on my former FS102 ;)

#48 NHRob

NHRob

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 8107
  • Joined: 27 Aug 2004
  • Loc: Southern Cloud-Hampshire

Posted 30 July 2014 - 08:04 AM

Hi Rodi,
Prism diagonal ... hmmm, interesting. Do you have any recommendations?

Thx,
Rob
  • Herbert Kong likes this

#49 Starman27

Starman27

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 8021
  • Joined: 29 Jan 2006
  • Loc: Illinois, Iowa

Posted 30 July 2014 - 08:23 AM

I landed the TAK eyepiece turret with a prism diagonal from E-bay for my FS128NSV. I don't know how I got along with out one. BTW works fine with other scopes like my 14 inch Meade SCT.

#50 roadi

roadi

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Joined: 18 Aug 2007
  • Loc: Denmark

Posted 30 July 2014 - 08:37 AM

Hi Rodi,
Prism diagonal ... hmmm, interesting. Do you have any recommendations?

Thx,
Rob

Yes.. in 1.25" Tak's own prism is excellent. I bet the baader/zeiss 35mm prism is just as good or even better yet, but I don't have any experience with this one.
If two inches, Baader/Zeiss "expensive"
If mirrored diagonals I would chose NONE dielectrics units. Not to say there isn't any good dielectric units out there, I just havn't seen one yet that match the sharpnes and contrast of the excellent prisms.

See Bill Paolini's Review! ;)
Looking forward to your comparo


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics