Is the Swaro in direct competition with the Zeiss Victory line? If that is true then why Zeiss built something much cheaper and better optically (assuming Victory is same quality with Swaro) to compete with their more expensive line?
A person from Birdforum was saying about the Terra 8x25:" The sample I tried wasn't sharp, the colours were dull and the sweetspot small. I asked the lady from Zeiss if they were all that bad and she just smiled and shrugged her shoulders so I presume the answer was yes so I moved on."
I really don't understand Zeiss strategy here???
This report seems questionable to me.
After the first Terra 8x25, which was stunning, I tried 3 more over a period of a few weeks. All were fantastic.