Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

APM 152 ED APO club

  • Please log in to reply
668 replies to this topic

#651 NCC-2893

NCC-2893

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 14 Nov 2020

Posted 18 November 2020 - 04:11 PM

Part 2

Attached Thumbnails

  • 20201118_215907.jpg
  • 20201118_215739.jpg

  • ASTERON and Bomber Bob like this

#652 NCC-2893

NCC-2893

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 14 Nov 2020

Posted 18 November 2020 - 04:22 PM

Part 3

 

Quality of the finder is pretty good but actually not easy to compare with a 50mm finder in terms of aperture. I like the small Skywatcher finder, too. But it is nothing wrong to go with a 80mm with such a large refractor. Good thing is you can change the eyepiece. 

 

I also bought the APM 24mm 55° (?) cross hair eypeace which I cannot really recommend. It has at least a cross hair laugh.gif but quite strong distortion on the edge. 

Attached Thumbnails

  • 20201118_215144.jpg

  • stevew and Bomber Bob like this

#653 CHASLX200

CHASLX200

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 20,883
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2007
  • Loc: Tampa area Florida

Posted 18 November 2020 - 07:06 PM

I used a ST-80 as a finder and helped with back weight on my 152.


  • ASTERON and NCC-2893 like this

#654 ASTERON

ASTERON

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,875
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2007
  • Loc: ISRAEL

Posted 19 November 2020 - 08:20 AM

I use a Sky-Watcher 6x30 RACI amici finder on my APM 152. It's a small finder, but it has a wide field of view and that makes it easy to get recognizable stars in the field that can also be seen with the naked eye. I generally can't see fainter deep-sky objects in it, but I can see enough stars to easily put the crosshairs over the position of the object, much like you do with a Telrad or red dot finder with the naked eye, I just have 6x higher precision and can see many more stars, making starhopping very easy. I actually prefer starhopping with the wee 6x30 finder over my 10x60 RACI for this reason, especially in summer, where my nights are very bright and I have trouble seeing enough naked eye stars to use a bigger finderscope, without making the starhops extremely long. 

 

I'm thinking about building a small super-high-end RACI finder from an ASKAR FMA 180, a Baader T2 Amici diagonal and a 24mm ES68 eyepiece. 7.5x magnification and 9° TFOV, with 40mm aperture. 

 

 

Clear skies!

Thomas, Denmark

Hi Thomas,

thanks for your reply.   I realize your opinion about 6X30 RACI finder for Star hopping.  My setup will be using  a Push- to on a DM6+ encoders with a Nexus +Sky Safari on an android tablet, so probably no star hopping with this Combo.  The reason I want a good finder is that I want high precision in alignment but I would like to be able to change the finder eyepiece for various reasons.  The interchangeable eyepiece will be good for dual use of the finder as a small RFT while changing to cross-hair illuminated eyepiece for alignment work.  and also gives freedom to change magnification and TFOV.

I like your  Idea of constructing a "super finder" from  different partsbow.gif bow.gif , It sounds very nice with the only caviat that you will have to sell a kidney to finance the parts. lol.gif

 

If you ever get this finder, don't forget to post pictures, !



#655 ASTERON

ASTERON

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,875
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2007
  • Loc: ISRAEL

Posted 19 November 2020 - 08:25 AM

Part1

APM ED APO 152mm with APM finder 80mm. 

Here are at least some pictures, rest to follow. 

NCC 2893,

Wow, that is a large beast of a finder (may serve right to balance the scope though).

Thanks for the pictures which nicely demonstrate the relative sizes of the scope vs. finder.

Lihu



#656 ASTERON

ASTERON

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,875
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2007
  • Loc: ISRAEL

Posted 19 November 2020 - 08:32 AM

Part 3

 

Quality of the finder is pretty good but actually not easy to compare with a 50mm finder in terms of aperture. I like the small Skywatcher finder, too. But it is nothing wrong to go with a 80mm with such a large refractor. Good thing is you can change the eyepiece. 

 

I also bought the APM 24mm 55° (?) cross hair eypeace which I cannot really recommend. It has at least a cross hair laugh.gif but quite strong distortion on the edge. 

Yes, I really need to be able to change the eyepiece. I wonder how good will it be as a guide-scope being an Achromat ?

Thanks for the warning about the APM eyepiece waytogo.gif , I will provbably be using a Televue plossel or a Nagler  or an ES 68 degree (which I already have, so I don't need to buy specially for the finder) on the finder. 


Edited by ASTERON, 19 November 2020 - 08:33 AM.


#657 ASTERON

ASTERON

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,875
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2007
  • Loc: ISRAEL

Posted 19 November 2020 - 08:41 AM

I used a ST-80 as a finder and helped with back weight on my 152.

Hi CHASLX200,

I also have an Orion ST80, which I may use as a finder, I will have to get an Amichi Prism diagonal for it's 1,25" drawtube and I will have to find tube rings to mount it  properly but since it's a 400mm focal length it may not be bad for  a variable magnification finder by changing eyepieces.

The end of the eyepiece holder of the Orion ST-80 is threaded on the outside.  Do you know if it is a male T or T2 thread ? if so It will be easy to correct the Baader Amichi prism to it directly.


Edited by ASTERON, 19 November 2020 - 08:52 AM.


#658 NCC-2893

NCC-2893

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 14 Nov 2020

Posted 19 November 2020 - 04:02 PM

And now something totally diffrent:

 

I really like the hardcase which comes with the frac but I think it needs a handle in the middle enabling you to carry it like a suitcase.

 

This is not a beauty version, but it works. Actually you could use the same handles like on the case but it was not awailable in the shop. And I needed a quick solution. Please see picturs.

 

Edit: And it is perfectly balanced when carrying. 

Attached Thumbnails

  • Case (1).jpg
  • Case (2).jpg

Edited by NCC-2893, 19 November 2020 - 05:54 PM.


#659 NCC-2893

NCC-2893

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 14 Nov 2020

Posted 19 November 2020 - 04:03 PM

More pix

Attached Thumbnails

  • Case (4).jpg
  • Case (8).jpg
  • Case (9).jpg


#660 NCC-2893

NCC-2893

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 14 Nov 2020

Posted 19 November 2020 - 04:05 PM

Sorry for the bad picture quality... 

Attached Thumbnails

  • Case (7).jpg

  • SteveG, aa5te and Astrojensen like this

#661 CHASLX200

CHASLX200

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 20,883
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2007
  • Loc: Tampa area Florida

Posted 19 November 2020 - 07:05 PM

Hi CHASLX200,

I also have an Orion ST80, which I may use as a finder, I will have to get an Amichi Prism diagonal for it's 1,25" drawtube and I will have to find tube rings to mount it  properly but since it's a 400mm focal length it may not be bad for  a variable magnification finder by changing eyepieces.

The end of the eyepiece holder of the Orion ST-80 is threaded on the outside.  Do you know if it is a male T or T2 thread ? if so It will be easy to correct the Baader Amichi prism to it directly.

I would have no clue as i don't have the scopes anymore.



#662 tom_fowler

tom_fowler

    Sputnik

  • *****
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 31 Oct 2011

Posted 21 November 2020 - 12:07 PM

I have a 152mm ED, and like it very much.  I recently purchased one of Markus' 115mm f/7 triplet LZOS scopes, which is a splendid piece of equipment.  I am curious if anyone in this august group has compared the 152mm ED to the 152mm LZOS that Markus sells?  At 3x the price, what is the difference?  Based on the 115mm I am thinking of upgrading, but the upgrade cost is pretty steep, especially if there is only a minor improvement.  I've attached an image of M13 taken with the 152mm a few years back.M13 reduced.jpg


  • stevew, aa5te, eros312 and 1 other like this

#663 aa5te

aa5te

    Genial Procrastinator

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,957
  • Joined: 30 Aug 2008
  • Loc: Clinton, TN

Posted 23 November 2020 - 11:25 PM

Reducers for maximum FOV on the APM 152ED - 

 

I have the Explore Scientific 0.7x reducer/flattener, and it "works", but has some visible vignetting on my APS-C sensor, and pixel-peeping reveals a small amount of CA visible on some stars. Has anyone directly compared the the ES 0.7x to the Starizona APEX-L 0.65x? I have an Altair Lightwave 0.6x FF/FR, but it's really meant for smaller sensors.

 

A pic taken with the APM and the 0.7x ES, adjusted to better show vignetting:

Attached Thumbnails

  • _DSC8723 (1).jpeg

Edited by aa5te, 23 November 2020 - 11:27 PM.


#664 aa5te

aa5te

    Genial Procrastinator

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,957
  • Joined: 30 Aug 2008
  • Loc: Clinton, TN

Posted 23 November 2020 - 11:26 PM

Close up to show CA mentioned above:

 

Attached Thumbnails

  • Screen Shot 2020-11-23 at 11.23.47 PM.jpg


#665 StarAlert

StarAlert

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 793
  • Joined: 11 Aug 2019

Posted 23 November 2020 - 11:43 PM

It's my understanding that a blue fringe on one side and a red fringe on the other is atmospheric dispersion, not CA. I am no expert, though. 

 

Close up to show CA mentioned above:


  • aa5te and eros312 like this

#666 aa5te

aa5te

    Genial Procrastinator

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,957
  • Joined: 30 Aug 2008
  • Loc: Clinton, TN

Posted 23 November 2020 - 11:46 PM

It's my understanding that a blue fringe on one side and a red fringe on the other is atmospheric dispersion, not CA. I am no expert, though. 

You may be right. I read that too, and I wondered that. What leads me to believe otherwise is that this is exactly like the constant color fringing that I, and others, have observed with the Orion 110mm Eon/iOptron 108mm Versa f/6 ED doublets.



#667 Astrojensen

Astrojensen

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 13,478
  • Joined: 05 Oct 2008
  • Loc: Bornholm, Denmark

Posted 24 November 2020 - 10:51 AM

It's my understanding that a blue fringe on one side and a red fringe on the other is atmospheric dispersion, not CA. I am no expert, though. 

 

You may be right. I read that too, and I wondered that. What leads me to believe otherwise is that this is exactly like the constant color fringing that I, and others, have observed with the Orion 110mm Eon/iOptron 108mm Versa f/6 ED doublets.

 

You may be right. I read that too, and I wondered that. What leads me to believe otherwise is that this is exactly like the constant color fringing that I, and others, have observed with the Orion 110mm Eon/iOptron 108mm Versa f/6 ED doublets.

If constant and always on the same side/same orientation, then it can be a sign of very slight misalignment in the doublet ED objective. I've seen this in my own 72mm William Optics ED doublet. 

 

 

Clear skies!

Thomas, Denmark


  • aa5te and eros312 like this

#668 BillP

BillP

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 20,826
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2006
  • Loc: Spotsylvania, VA

Posted 24 November 2020 - 11:54 AM

Close up to show CA mentioned above:

I would imagine, in an imaging train, there could be multiple reasons.  I suggest you post this in the imaging forum and let that group go thru all the different possibilities with you.  Might behoove you to image an artificial star indoors too to eliminate atmospheric effects.


  • aa5te likes this

#669 Heywood

Heywood

    Apollo

  • -----
  • Posts: 1,400
  • Joined: 03 Jan 2009

Posted 24 November 2020 - 01:00 PM

If constant and always on the same side/same orientation, then it can be a sign of very slight misalignment in the doublet ED objective. I've seen this in my own 72mm William Optics ED doublet.


Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark


I'm betting it's a slight misalignment, as Thomas stated.


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics