Cosmic Challenge: Abell Galaxy Cluster 426
Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:14 AM
Click here to view the article
- okiestarman56, Miguelo, happylimpet and 2 others like this
Posted 07 December 2017 - 06:34 AM
Nice one Phil!
On the bucket list - yes, I have a Sky Safari list appropriately labelled "Bucket List"!
- PhilH likes this
Posted 07 December 2017 - 07:02 AM
500 galaxies...what did I do to you, Phil? Are you trying to kill me via sleep deprivation?
Oh well, I guess there are worse ways to go than seeing how deep one can peer into an Abell Galaxy Cluster.
Thanks for the article, I suppose I need to start marking up that A4 Uranometria chart so that I am ready to go really deep.
Kudos for listing v, b, and p where known. V is often 0.5 to 1.0 mag brighter than b or p so this can have substantial impact on visibility for those with smaller scopes and/or in poorer skies.
- PhilH likes this
Posted 07 December 2017 - 12:40 PM
And now this, just when I thought knocking off 60 of M31's globular clusters in one night with the 17.5" was a nice accomplishment. Turns out that was just a drop in the bucket (list).
Posted Yesterday, 09:14 AM
Thank you, Phil. Abell Clusters are my favorite objects! Ah, yes! I looked at A426 this past Oct18/19, with the JMI RB-16 binos. Here's from my journal: "1281, etc. Perseus Cluster, loaded with galaxies! Individual galaxies tough among stars at 102x. So, yes, I do see it pretty well, but recall the 29, under great conditions was much easier. Night Vision definitely helps, shows myriad galaxies in field, ten, at least distinct ones vs like two with the Panos at 102x. But, the NV impression is WAY different [80x]. The galaxies (vs stars) have soft halos and all have star-like, softish cores (ie the NIR penetration). The NV is not aesthetic, but certainly distinguishes galaxies from stars. Good Night! ~fin~" Then, just last night, Dec 10th, I reviewed all of my astrophoto negatives from 1984-1992. Quite a few Abells in there too! Tom
Posted Yesterday, 09:25 AM
Ummm... Phil, your annotation to the eyepiece sketch, "the author's 18-inch (46cm) refractor." REFRACTOR?! If so, WOW! Tom
Posted Today, 02:28 AM