Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

C14: How much mirror flop is too much?

catadioptric Celestron optics SCT collimation
  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#51 bobhen

bobhen

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Joined: 25 Jun 2005

Posted 26 October 2018 - 10:57 AM

Just a bit of follow-up. I ended up sending the OTA to Celestron. They confirmed that the mirror was not attached to the supports, and removed the old RTV, re-attached the mirror with new RTV, rotated the optical components to get the best alignment, and collimated it. With the mirror removed, they cleaned and re-greased the slider, and cleaned all the optics. The cost was the same as the basic service. The shipping was actually more expensive than the service. The scope is on its way back, and I'll post new shift numbers once I have time and weather that allows me to check it. 

 

The repair experience was a bit mixed. On the one hand, I got to speak to the repair supervisor who was extremely helpful and knowledgable. But the email communication was a bit confused. I emailed a description of the problem and a list of other things I wanted checked. When it arrived, they sent me email saying that they would clean and collimate it and return it. After a few emails, I finally got to speak to the supervisor who said he would ensure that all of the issues would be addressed. After a couple of weeks, I got another email saying that my OTA had been cleaned, collimated, and was being shipped. So once again I called to be sure that they actually did what I asked. The receptionist couldn't reach the repair supervisor, so she scrambled to get my message to the repair department and called the shipment back from Fedex. The supervisor called me back a couple of hours later to assure me that it had been serviced as requested, and that they had confused it with another OTA in the email. Now they are shipping it again. Basically, when I was able to speak directly to real people, they were incredibly helpful and responsive. There just seems to be an issue with connecting email for service requests under ticket numbers with email related to receiving and shipping. 

 

But, to partly answer the original question I posted, the amount of shift I was seeing was indicative of a serious problem in the optics, and was outside of the norm. I have to wonder how long it has been this way. The previous owner was complaining that his mount was not working and needed to go in for service, but that could have been due to the impossibility of building a model with inconsistent star positions. It also makes me wonder how many of the people who have "fixed" their shift problems by tightening the retaining ring are actually dealing with separation of the RTV on one or more arms.

 

Chip W.

Just as I suspected and wrote in post number 42.

 

The good news is that after my C11 came back from Celestron, collimation (with normal handling) held really well. And I had no additional “mirror flop” issues for the remainder of the 13 years that I owned the scope.

 

Bob



#52 ccwemyss

ccwemyss

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 61
  • Joined: 11 Aug 2016
  • Loc: Massachusetts

Posted 05 December 2018 - 12:10 AM

Some additional follow-up. Once the scope arrived, it took over a month to get a good night to test it. The first thing that I noticed upon unpacking it when it arrived was that the shipping locks were not engaged, and the screws holding the rear cell and tube together were all loose, with noticeable movement. So much for the collimation job Celestron did on it! I put the scope face down and tightened all of the screws to try to get it as square as possible, without being able to put it on an optical bench. On first light, it was clearly way out of collimation. I was also surprised by how loose the collimation screws were on the secondary. Even so, it just took a little extra time to get decent collimation. 

 

Flipping the scope between stars on opposite sides of the meridian (Enif and Castor), there still appeared to be some flop, but I need to redo the test with a finder that has finer crosshairs. As a rough estimate, I would say it is down to 3' to 5', but the focus shift is about 1', so some of it may be from the slider tilting on the baffle tube, rather than the mirror moving in its cell. Even if it is flopping that much, it's an order of magnitude improvement over the original behavior. Centering a star in the finder consistently put it somewhere in the view of a 10mm (391X, 11' field) eyepiece. On one side of the meridian it was always above center, on the other side it was always below, which is why I think there is still a bit of flop. 

 

The best news is that it now maintains good collimation on opposite sides of the sky. So it is now a usable OTA, which is what I was after. 

 

Chip W. 




CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: catadioptric, Celestron, optics, SCT, collimation



Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics