Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Celestron Edge HD vs Meade ACF [Optical Properties]

  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#51 SandyHouTex

SandyHouTex

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4006
  • Joined: 02 Jun 2009
  • Loc: Houston, Texas, USA

Posted 20 August 2019 - 10:01 AM

So in the early '90s I bought a Meade ETX-125 that was optically excellent.  In '99 I bought a LX-50, 10 inch Meade with pinched optics.  I haven't been able to fix it, and finally in the early 2000s I purchased a LXD-55 AR6.  The first OTA had one of the separators in the optical path, back it went, the next OTA wasn't diffraction limited, back it went, and finally, on the third try, they sent me one that was nice.  I haven't bought a Meade since.  I switched to Celestron in the mid-2000s, and all of the Celestron OTAs in my equipment list are good to excellent optically.  I had to send the first C-14 back because it had a thumbprint on the top outside of the primary.

 

I've only heard bad things about Meade since they went bankrupt and were bought by a Chinese company that makes department store scopes.


Edited by SandyHouTex, 20 August 2019 - 10:02 AM.

  • rkelley8493 likes this

#52 rkelley8493

rkelley8493

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 888
  • Joined: 19 Jan 2019
  • Loc: Southeast USA

Posted 20 August 2019 - 10:32 AM

So in the early '90s I bought a Meade ETX-125 that was optically excellent.  In '99 I bought a LX-50, 10 inch Meade with pinched optics.  I haven't been able to fix it, and finally in the early 2000s I purchased a LXD-55 AR6.  The first OTA had one of the separators in the optical path, back it went, the next OTA wasn't diffraction limited, back it went, and finally, on the third try, they sent me one that was nice.  I haven't bought a Meade since.  I switched to Celestron in the mid-2000s, and all of the Celestron OTAs in my equipment list are good to excellent optically.  I had to send the first C-14 back because it had a thumbprint on the top outside of the primary.

 

I've only heard bad things about Meade since they went bankrupt and were bought by a Chinese company that makes department store scopes.

O i c.. that makes sense. I know they used to be made in the good ol' US of A until some time in the 2000s. That's kind of disappointing as a consumer how a company name with a good reputation ends up becoming something totally different than what it started out as. Think of how it would be if Coca-Cola went bankrupt and was bought out by a Chinese soda company, and that familiar taste of cola-classic turned into a bitter tasting carbonated water. Shouldn't they change the name of it to something else?

My impression of Meade has been neutral lately, neither love nor hate. 5 years ago, after I got my first real scope [Meade ETX-125], it was much love! Even now, I still love this little scope. It's very well made, and the finer details are really nice. For example, the decal on the side of the OTA is painted onto the tube. On my LX90, the decals are stickers that are starting to peel off already, and I haven't even owned this thing a full year. A lot of times it's the smaller things about equipment that stand out the most.

I think what changed my mind the most was when I got the LightBridge. It arrived very sloppy. The primary mirror cover was off and just rattling around inside the tube. There was a dent on the primary mirror tube. It wasn't packaged well at all and was rather dirty. If it wasn't such a large package, I probably would've returned it. 

 

Edit: Check out the pictures in this thread on the LightBridge. It's very similar to how I received mine.

 

https://www.cloudyni...uxe-had-issues/


Edited by rkelley8493, 20 August 2019 - 10:41 AM.


#53 SandyHouTex

SandyHouTex

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4006
  • Joined: 02 Jun 2009
  • Loc: Houston, Texas, USA

Posted 21 August 2019 - 09:25 AM

O i c.. that makes sense. I know they used to be made in the good ol' US of A until some time in the 2000s. That's kind of disappointing as a consumer how a company name with a good reputation ends up becoming something totally different than what it started out as. Think of how it would be if Coca-Cola went bankrupt and was bought out by a Chinese soda company, and that familiar taste of cola-classic turned into a bitter tasting carbonated water. Shouldn't they change the name of it to something else?

My impression of Meade has been neutral lately, neither love nor hate. 5 years ago, after I got my first real scope [Meade ETX-125], it was much love! Even now, I still love this little scope. It's very well made, and the finer details are really nice. For example, the decal on the side of the OTA is painted onto the tube. On my LX90, the decals are stickers that are starting to peel off already, and I haven't even owned this thing a full year. A lot of times it's the smaller things about equipment that stand out the most.

I think what changed my mind the most was when I got the LightBridge. It arrived very sloppy. The primary mirror cover was off and just rattling around inside the tube. There was a dent on the primary mirror tube. It wasn't packaged well at all and was rather dirty. If it wasn't such a large package, I probably would've returned it. 

 

Edit: Check out the pictures in this thread on the LightBridge. It's very similar to how I received mine.

 

https://www.cloudyni...uxe-had-issues/

Wow.  What a mess that scope was.


  • rkelley8493 likes this


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics