Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Stellarvue SV102-Access Apo Refractor

  • Please log in to reply
499 replies to this topic

#451 erin

erin

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 787
  • Joined: 27 Jan 2018
  • Loc: MA

Posted 31 October 2019 - 09:10 PM

I usually just use an RDF, but in my red zone, I find the RDF and RACI combo helps with the star-hopping—especially at zenith and when looking for the fainter fuzzies and clusters.



#452 jp76

jp76

    Explorer 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 06 Aug 2019
  • Loc: San Jose, California

Posted 31 October 2019 - 11:35 PM

You're right, thanks! I was basing my question on my old Orion finderscope. Looks like that didn't fit because it wasn't machined well. The new 6x30 RACI fits fine. It does stick out a bit because there's no back notch on the Stellarvue base, but both base screws still catch on to the finder stalk.

You can always swap the finder shoe. I tried a GSO RACI finder on my sv102-access but it totally unbalanced the scope. I finally acquired all the hardware to mount it to the top of one of the rings but it doesn't quite fit mounted next to the telrad I acquired and I'd rather have the telrad I think. (I also have a 30mm UFF.) I'll probably just keep the RACI and all the mounting pieces in my parts box just in case it's needed someday and stick with the telrad I mounted on a 1x2? on top of the rings. Its a bit big but it works. I was never sure what all I needed to use one of the Stellarvue RDFs so I never bought one.


  • stevew likes this

#453 jp76

jp76

    Explorer 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 06 Aug 2019
  • Loc: San Jose, California

Posted 04 November 2019 - 07:12 PM

Does anyone have a good recommendation for a case for this telescope? I would like to transport it with the 2" diagonal attached. I would think a hard case would protect the telescope best from any other items impacting it while its being transported in the trunk of a car. Or should I just order the C9S and be done with it?



#454 desertlens

desertlens

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,680
  • Joined: 06 Dec 2010
  • Loc: 36°N 105°W

Posted 04 November 2019 - 07:35 PM

The SV C9S is very stout, well padded and tough on its exterior surfaces. I've found it to be the ideal case for the 102 Access.


  • stevew, dmorrow, Auburn80 and 2 others like this

#455 Mattman1701

Mattman1701

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 08 Aug 2016
  • Loc: Buffalo, New York

Posted 04 November 2019 - 09:11 PM

The SV C9S is very stout, well padded and tough on its exterior surfaces. I've found it to be the ideal case for the 102 Access.

Ditto


  • stevew and jp76 like this

#456 jp76

jp76

    Explorer 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 06 Aug 2019
  • Loc: San Jose, California

Posted 04 November 2019 - 10:04 PM

Okay thanks. I just placed my order.


  • stevew likes this

#457 Steve Cox

Steve Cox

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1,804
  • Joined: 19 Jan 2017

Posted 06 November 2019 - 08:42 AM

Since I am on call, I could not spend much time with the new acquisition tonight. Put it on my Voyager mount and just surfed around the sky a bit with my 18.2mm Delite. Stars were sharp across the field with no visible color. I centered Vega and put in my 5mm Delite to do a quick star test. Perfectly concentric rings inside and outside focus, no sign of pinched optics or any other issues that I could see. 

 

The only issue that I could find was what felt like slightly rough spots while racking the focuser in and out. When I went inside I checked the rack and there were no signs of debris or damage. I did a slight adjustment on the screws holding the pinion and it is now buttery smooth. Overall I am very happy with my purchase.

Now that you've had your scope for a bit, I'm curious how you feel the AT compares against the SV, or did you decide to sell the AT after all?  I've been more than pleased with my AT and have no regrets missing out on the SV sale, but still curious how they compare visually and mechanically in the real world with real eyes.



#458 joseph07081

joseph07081

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 481
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2005
  • Loc: Chippewa, PA

Posted 06 November 2019 - 09:32 AM

Now that you've had your scope for a bit, I'm curious how you feel the AT compares against the SV, or did you decide to sell the AT after all?  I've been more than pleased with my AT and have no regrets missing out on the SV sale, but still curious how they compare visually and mechanically in the real world with real eyes.

I felt the AT compared very favorably to the SV. Honestly, if I were just going to continue using it visually, I would not have even given it another thought. My main reason for switching from the AT to the SV was that I will be using it for astrophotography some day and I wanted the slightly better glass. I will not hesitate to recommend the AT102ED to anyone, I feel it is a fine scope. 


  • Steve Cox and HowardSD like this

#459 russell23

russell23

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 11,033
  • Joined: 31 May 2009
  • Loc: Upstate NY

Posted 06 November 2019 - 03:26 PM

Now that you've had your scope for a bit, I'm curious how you feel the AT compares against the SV, or did you decide to sell the AT after all?  I've been more than pleased with my AT and have no regrets missing out on the SV sale, but still curious how they compare visually and mechanically in the real world with real eyes.

I have both and will be keeping both.  The AT is my "backup" for when the SV dews over.   The focuser is great on both, but I do like the super smooth rotating feature of the SV.   The SV has a little better star test, but both are good.   

 

Since I bought the AT102 I've used my SW120 much less and since I bought the SV102 with that deal I have hardly used the SW120.

 

Dave


  • joseph07081, stevew and Steve Cox like this

#460 joseph07081

joseph07081

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 481
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2005
  • Loc: Chippewa, PA

Posted 06 November 2019 - 04:00 PM

I have both and will be keeping both.  The AT is my "backup" for when the SV dews over.   The focuser is great on both, but I do like the super smooth rotating feature of the SV.   The SV has a little better star test, but both are good.   

 

Since I bought the AT102 I've used my SW120 much less and since I bought the SV102 with that deal I have hardly used the SW120.

 

Dave

I would have loved to have kept both, use the AT102 for visual, grab-n-go use, and the SV photographically. Unfortunately I have also recently upgraded my eyepieces to Televue Delites, added a new M2C mount, waiting on a new AT72EDii, and looking at a new mount (most likely a CEM40). I am selling off little used items to help fund the new updates, and I could not justify keeping both right now.


  • ken30809 likes this

#461 Matty S

Matty S

    Mariner 2

  • -----
  • Posts: 224
  • Joined: 10 Sep 2017
  • Loc: Hillsboro, Nh

Posted 20 November 2019 - 11:11 AM

Been nothing but clouds and rain here for weeks, but set up the scope on my mount for some pics. I opted for the case (very nice) and the 2" quartz dielectric diagonal. This is the upward limit for a grab n' go setup, IMO.

Shown on Twilight I mount with the hefty 20mm Nagler (to judge the payload) and 55mm Plossl. The mount handles the scope well with just a little shake after focusing which settles quickly. Can't wait to get it out under the stars!

Attached Thumbnails

  • sv1022.jpg

  • jimandlaura26, Don Allen, stevew and 4 others like this

#462 stevew

stevew

    Now I've done it

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,485
  • Joined: 03 Mar 2006
  • Loc: British Columbia Canada

Posted 23 November 2019 - 09:04 PM

I have both and will be keeping both.  The AT is my "backup" for when the SV dews over.   

 

Dave

LOL....

The Stellarvue 102 Access is a great scope.


Edited by stevew, 23 November 2019 - 09:18 PM.


#463 Tyson M

Tyson M

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,759
  • Joined: 22 Jan 2015
  • Loc: Canada

Posted 23 November 2019 - 11:38 PM

I have both and will be keeping both.  The AT is my "backup" for when the SV dews over.   The focuser is great on both, but I do like the super smooth rotating feature of the SV.   The SV has a little better star test, but both are good.   

 

Since I bought the AT102 I've used my SW120 much less and since I bought the SV102 with that deal I have hardly used the SW120.

 

Dave

No dew heaters hey? Just an extra scope instead haha.

Although, you usually make a large homemade cardboard dew shield.


  • stevew likes this

#464 Bigzmey

Bigzmey

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 25 Sep 2015
  • Loc: San Diego

Posted 16 December 2019 - 07:35 PM

I need to get  focuser extension tube for my SV102 access. A few listed on SV site are not compatible with Access scopes.

 

Any ideas?   



#465 stevew

stevew

    Now I've done it

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,485
  • Joined: 03 Mar 2006
  • Loc: British Columbia Canada

Posted 16 December 2019 - 09:27 PM

I need to get  focuser extension tube for my SV102 access. A few listed on SV site are not compatible with Access scopes.

 

Any ideas?   

My SV102 comes to focus with everything from a 40mm to 4.7mm so I assume your imaging with yours.

How about this https://www.telescop...yword=extension


  • Bigzmey likes this

#466 Bigzmey

Bigzmey

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 25 Sep 2015
  • Loc: San Diego

Posted 16 December 2019 - 10:01 PM

My SV102 comes to focus with everything from a 40mm to 4.7mm so I assume your imaging with yours.

How about this https://www.telescop...yword=extension

I bet you use 2" diagonal. :) I use it for visual with 1.25" prism and just discovered yesterday that I can't get to focus with Delite 7mm and below. 

 

I had ES APO scopes in the past and they came with two extension rings which you can screw in as needed between the focuser tube and the visual back.

 

I was hoping the Stellarvue has something like that for the Access line.    


  • stevew likes this

#467 stevew

stevew

    Now I've done it

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,485
  • Joined: 03 Mar 2006
  • Loc: British Columbia Canada

Posted 17 December 2019 - 01:20 AM

They also make a 1.25 inch version....

https://www.telescop...yword=extension


Edited by stevew, 17 December 2019 - 01:22 AM.

  • Bigzmey likes this

#468 Bigzmey

Bigzmey

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 25 Sep 2015
  • Loc: San Diego

Posted 17 December 2019 - 02:50 PM

I got reply from Stellarvue. They suggest to use

 

https://www.stellarv...ds-80-mm-et080/


Edited by Bigzmey, 17 December 2019 - 08:40 PM.


#469 scadvice

scadvice

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 2,161
  • Joined: 20 Feb 2018
  • Loc: Lodi, California

Posted 17 December 2019 - 04:01 PM

Your link doesn't work. I have one of these for my Access 80mm and it is threaded 48mm on the inside and I just screwed on my 80mm. I used it for guide camera spacing...It worked perfect.

 

https://www.stellarv...ds-80-mm-et080/



#470 photoracer18

photoracer18

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,457
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2013
  • Loc: Martinsburg, WV

Posted 17 December 2019 - 04:49 PM

Call me a skeptic, but why contract to buy telescopes that require custom individual inspection and tweaking prior to shipment?  The only reason I haven't ordered one is because of cognitive dissonance.  The website / advertisement is deceptive as it states "save $400".  That would be honest if the sale price included the previously included $169 case.  It's 25% off and a good deal, but what's with all the smoke and mirrors?  "Shipment is delayed for a week while we QC" since it's delayed, how about an upgrade for only $100 now they're shipping right away- give me a break.  Is that bait and switch?  Way to dump on all the people that bought these at full price.  I guess I just talked myself out of it.  If there was more straight shooting, I would have been in a long time ago.  

 

attachicon.gifIMG_0361.PNG

Why buy scopes from companies that just transship what they receive from China without checking them out? That is pretty much what everyone else does. Sure they will likely swap it out if you find out it has a problem but why go thru the hassle of that?


  • stevew, russell23 and Jdrasberry like this

#471 Bigzmey

Bigzmey

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 25 Sep 2015
  • Loc: San Diego

Posted 17 December 2019 - 08:43 PM

Your link doesn't work. I have one of these for my Access 80mm and it is threaded 48mm on the inside and I just screwed on my 80mm. I used it for guide camera spacing...It worked perfect.

 

https://www.stellarv...ds-80-mm-et080/

Yes, this is what they have suggested. 

 

I could be neat-picking but how hard is to make a 2.5" extension tube for 2.5" focuser? laugh.gif  


Edited by Bigzmey, 17 December 2019 - 08:47 PM.


#472 YAOG

YAOG

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,161
  • Joined: 12 Oct 2015
  • Loc: Southern California

Posted 19 December 2019 - 05:42 PM

Yes, this is what they have suggested. 

 

I could be neat-picking but how hard is to make a 2.5" extension tube for 2.5" focuser? laugh.gif  

Are you looking to remove the 2" eyepiece clamp and thread on an extension and then thread back the stock 2" eyepiece clamp on the end? 



#473 Cpk133

Cpk133

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1,503
  • Joined: 14 Mar 2015
  • Loc: SE Michigan

Posted 27 December 2019 - 10:54 AM

Why buy scopes from companies that just transship what they receive from China without checking them out? That is pretty much what everyone else does. Sure they will likely swap it out if you find out it has a problem but why go thru the hassle of that?

Cheaper and in the end you're getting the same thing.  I'd rather buy from Astronomics than someone that claims to perform a bunch of QC then ships defective scopes.


  • Steve Cox likes this

#474 russell23

russell23

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 11,033
  • Joined: 31 May 2009
  • Loc: Upstate NY

Posted 27 December 2019 - 11:42 AM

Cheaper and in the end you're getting the same thing.  I'd rather buy from Astronomics than someone that claims to perform a bunch of QC then ships defective scopes.

In the last year I have purchased an AT102ED,  SV80 Access, and SV102 Access.   None of them were defective in any way. 


  • stevew and Jdrasberry like this

#475 scadvice

scadvice

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 2,161
  • Joined: 20 Feb 2018
  • Loc: Lodi, California

Posted 27 December 2019 - 02:19 PM

Cheaper and in the end you're getting the same thing.  I'd rather buy from Astronomics than someone that claims to perform a bunch of QC then ships defective scopes.

What companies or company are you referring to?

 

Stellarvue I know inspects ALL their scopes before packaging and shipping. I've toured their facility. They even inspect the Access scope line which is/was imported. BTW they are phasing out the import line completely in the next month or and will be selling only their made in Auburn California line.


  • stevew and Jdrasberry like this


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics