
Review: The Vixen FL55ss
#1
Posted 08 September 2019 - 11:32 AM
Click here to view the article
- paulsky, zjc26138 and dUbeni like this
#2
Posted 13 September 2019 - 09:06 PM
Great review. I do think these small refractors can be a lot of fun.
Another application for these small telescopes is spectroscopy!
I am sure your Vixen FL55ss would work as well as my Borg 55FL. This is not a great image of open cluster NGC 6231, but the Wolf-Rayet star (HD 152270 = WR 79) sticks out (the lines to the right are the spectra)
Thank you for promoting these wonderful small telescopes.
- zjc26138, eros312, gustavo_sanchez and 4 others like this
#3
Posted 15 September 2019 - 10:10 PM
Good review! I wonder though if anyone has compared these small, fast refractors against normal camera lenses?
#4
Posted 16 September 2019 - 04:34 AM
Where are the pictures of the scope???
- wrnchhead and JB103 like this
#5
Posted 16 September 2019 - 04:41 AM
Very interesting! Which kind if equipment do you use?
@RichA
I use also a Canon ef200 f/2.8: the FL55ss is noticeably better even at f/4 (less CA, tighter stars, less coma).
The lens however is smaller, lighter (but the refractor+reducer is smaller than a 200 and a 300mm lens) and much faster.
I focus manually, sometimes with the help of a mask, and feel easier to do so with the refractor.
The lens is obviously more handy for daytime photography
#6
Posted 24 September 2019 - 08:25 PM
the star tests I have seen on a full frame via astrobin yield un impressive stars at the edges, I have no way of knowing if this was because of spacing. Have you tested with ff?
#7
Posted 25 September 2019 - 11:10 AM
No, I have only an aps-c sized camera.
On Vixen's website there are the spot diagrams for flattener and reducer+flattener, with flats and a picture taken with a Canon camera (https://www.vixen.co...roduct/37253_9/ ).
With a FF there could be the need of some work on star shapes at the edges
I also contacted them through the site asking about spacing because am still pondering my next camera (FF DSLR or cooled ccd), and a couple of days later they answered me sending a diagram from which I understood that the sensor has to be 63,5mm behind the reducer, and that the adapter I have offsets that distance for Canon's cameras.
- Cziffra likes this
#8
Posted 25 October 2019 - 02:43 PM
How does it compare to Williams Optic Redcap 51 APO?
#9
Posted 28 October 2019 - 09:30 AM
I can not say since do not own the RedCat
#10
Posted 19 January 2025 - 06:17 PM
Great review. I do think these small refractors can be a lot of fun.
Another application for these small telescopes is spectroscopy!I am sure your Vixen FL55ss would work as well as my Borg 55FL. This is not a great image of open cluster NGC 6231, but the Wolf-Rayet star (HD 152270 = WR 79) sticks out (the lines to the right are the spectra)
Here is the annotated spectrum, clearly showing features of a WC Wolf-Rayet star.By contrast, here is a WN Wolf-Rayet star, WR 136, HD 192163Here's a spectrum of planetary nebula NGC 6886, that is a mere speck even in much larger apertures, but reveals some details in its spectrum.
Thank you for promoting these wonderful small telescopes.
Organic Astrochemist,
Pardon me for commenting on such an old post (and straying from the thread's intent, perhaps), but this is very interesting. Do you have a pic of your 55-mm scope paired with your spectrograph?