Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Any disadvantage to Optolong L-Extreme vs L-Enhance?

  • Please log in to reply
223 replies to this topic

#51 Craig_

Craig_

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 95
  • Joined: 15 May 2020

Posted 20 August 2020 - 06:31 AM

Yes, it fits. I also use this filter drawer and just ordered an extra filter holder. Now I have the L Pro and L eXtreme each in a holder for easy swapping.

Great, thanks for confirming! I've got a couple of spare filter holders, need to sort out some sort of decent storage for them to keep the filters in them when not in use. The standard case works but it just moves around a lot inside with no padding.


  • mewmartigan likes this

#52 vballrican

vballrican

    Explorer 1

  • ***--
  • Posts: 65
  • Joined: 02 Jan 2019
  • Loc: Sarasota, Fl

Posted 20 August 2020 - 02:08 PM

Just another example of what can be done with the l-enhanced... cropped so it can be uploaded here. Thanks. 

Attached Thumbnails

  • M8-Lagoon-L-enhanced.jpg

  • elmiko, bosh60 and SoDaKAstroNut like this

#53 Vividia

Vividia

    Sputnik

  • -----
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 17 May 2019
  • Loc: Louisville, KY

Posted 20 August 2020 - 08:05 PM

some wonderful images for sure!  Thanks everyone for sharing.

 

I have the L-Pro and the L-Enhance, and the Extreme on order.  I am curious, assuming the same sky conditions, which of these 3 do you use for what targets?  I need to try and figure out where the Extreme will fit in the rotation, or maybe just do both Extreme and Enhance on same targets and stackem LOL.



#54 vballrican

vballrican

    Explorer 1

  • ***--
  • Posts: 65
  • Joined: 02 Jan 2019
  • Loc: Sarasota, Fl

Posted 20 August 2020 - 08:21 PM

I would think having the l-extreme and l-enhance is counterproductive but that's just me. I use the L-Pro for galaxies and Clusters and the l-Enhance for nebulae... i think the wider spectrum of the l-enhance is better to capture detail otherwise not captured in a multi-"narrowband" filter. If i want to really capture just a specific wavelength, i would use mono.  


  • mewmartigan, SoDaKAstroNut, mjbetancourt and 1 other like this

#55 mewmartigan

mewmartigan

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,386
  • Joined: 02 Jul 2008
  • Loc: outside of Pittsburgh, PA

Posted 20 August 2020 - 08:40 PM

some wonderful images for sure! Thanks everyone for sharing.

I have the L-Pro and the L-Enhance, and the Extreme on order. I am curious, assuming the same sky conditions, which of these 3 do you use for what targets? I need to try and figure out where the Extreme will fit in the rotation, or maybe just do both Extreme and Enhance on same targets and stackem LOL.


I sold my eNhance for the eXtreme. You don't need both. I use the L Pro for broadband targets like galaxies and the eXtreme for emission nebula.
  • Sniuk likes this

#56 Huangdi

Huangdi

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 24 Jul 2019

Posted 20 August 2020 - 09:41 PM

some wonderful images for sure! Thanks everyone for sharing.

I have the L-Pro and the L-Enhance, and the Extreme on order. I am curious, assuming the same sky conditions, which of these 3 do you use for what targets? I need to try and figure out where the Extreme will fit in the rotation, or maybe just do both Extreme and Enhance on same targets and stackem LOL.


Once you have the L-Extreme, the L-Enhance can be sold or put away for eternity. There isn't a single case where it outperforms the L-Extreme, so you'd be best off selling it.

I'm no big fan of broadband filters such as the L-Pro, but you basically use it any time you're not shooting emission nebulae. For those you have the L-Extreme.

If you stack data from the L-Enhance with the L-Extreme the result is going to be major loss in contrast and quality of your images, especially in the green channel.
  • mjbetancourt likes this

#57 jemarcks

jemarcks

    Sputnik

  • -----
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 18 Dec 2019

Posted 21 August 2020 - 09:07 PM

Has anybody had any experience with using the L-Extreme with a fast scope like the RASA8 f/2?  Does the 7nm band get shifted?


  • arrowspace90 and astrodd like this

#58 Billx

Billx

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 81
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2018

Posted 22 August 2020 - 08:21 AM

How would the L-Extreme hold up with a full moon?  Unfortunately, it seems that the clouds in my area only clear when the moon is bright.



#59 Huangdi

Huangdi

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 24 Jul 2019

Posted 22 August 2020 - 08:55 AM

How would the L-Extreme hold up with a full moon?  Unfortunately, it seems that the clouds in my area only clear when the moon is bright.

Ha wouldn't care much, Oiii will suffer. But Oiii will suffer even with 3nm Astrodons during a full moon. It'll do nicely.



#60 RogueZero

RogueZero

    Sputnik

  • *****
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 09 Mar 2020
  • Loc: Colorado

Posted 22 August 2020 - 06:30 PM

I think I'm starting to figure it out, finally.

 

Sadr1_8Hr_AddStars_x0.25.jpg

 

8 hours on the Butterfly using Extreme filter on an 80mm. No noise reduction, still has a ton of hot pixels, and Sadr is completely butchered... but it has blue!


  • Scott Mitchell, tbowkman, elmiko and 2 others like this

#61 17.5Dob

17.5Dob

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 10,350
  • Joined: 21 Mar 2013
  • Loc: Colorado,USA

Posted 22 August 2020 - 07:03 PM

Any disadvantage to Optolong L-Extreme vs L-Enhance?

 

Yes, it's impossible to find.......


  • arrowspace90 and elmiko like this

#62 elmiko

elmiko

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,914
  • Joined: 27 Jul 2009
  • Loc: Arizona

Posted 24 August 2020 - 08:43 AM

get.jpg?insecure

 

Used the L-eNhance filter and UV-IR for the stars.



#63 Huangdi

Huangdi

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 24 Jul 2019

Posted 24 August 2020 - 10:14 AM

get.jpg?insecure

Used the L-eNhance filter and UV-IR for the stars.


That's really good! Nicely done.
  • elmiko likes this

#64 elmiko

elmiko

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,914
  • Joined: 27 Jul 2009
  • Loc: Arizona

Posted 24 August 2020 - 10:53 AM

Thanks Julian! I look forward to getting the L-xtreme filter to compare!


  • Huangdi likes this

#65 Scott Mitchell

Scott Mitchell

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,479
  • Joined: 28 Jul 2007
  • Loc: Atlanta-ish, GA

Posted 24 August 2020 - 08:02 PM

I think I'm starting to figure it out, finally.

 

attachicon.gifSadr1_8Hr_AddStars_x0.25.jpg

 

8 hours on the Butterfly using Extreme filter on an 80mm. No noise reduction, still has a ton of hot pixels, and Sadr is completely butchered... but it has blue!

So now you must reveal your secrets! smile.gif


Edited by Scott Mitchell, 24 August 2020 - 08:02 PM.


#66 Bretw01

Bretw01

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,020
  • Joined: 13 Feb 2017
  • Loc: IL USA

Posted 25 August 2020 - 09:51 AM

I am really liking my L_eNhance filter. I think any negative comments come from not properly using the filter. For me 5 minute subs are the minimum, shooting with an F5.8 scope. I have taken subs up to 20 minutes, but 5 to 10 are usually sufficient. 

 

Here are some recent examples:

 

NGC6960 Taken during the full moon, average phase 97.92%

 

get.jpg?insecure

 

M8 two hours integration

 

get.jpg?insecure

 

M17

 

get.jpg?insecure

 

3 hours on the Cats Eye

 

get.jpg?insecure

 

Similar to the OP's question, I would like to know if there is enough of an advantage to the L_Extreme, to purchase it since I have the L_eNhance.


  • elmiko, Stargazer3236, DRK73 and 2 others like this

#67 elmiko

elmiko

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,914
  • Joined: 27 Jul 2009
  • Loc: Arizona

Posted 25 August 2020 - 09:22 PM

Nice Images Bret! I agree, I usually do 5 minute subs with my refractor. I have done 10 minute subs also. The 10 minute subs were really clean.



#68 bosh60

bosh60

    Vendor - SkyTrack

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 323
  • Joined: 03 Sep 2018
  • Loc: Southwestern Ontario, Canada

Posted 26 August 2020 - 08:02 AM

This is in the context of me being a discouraged beginner.  I decided to try the L-Extreme after reading this thread (only used a UV-IR cut filter before). It arrived yesterday and this is my first image with it.  It's a game-changer for me. 

Attached Thumbnails

  • elephant_small.jpg

Edited by bosh60, 26 August 2020 - 08:03 AM.

  • tjay, mewmartigan, elmiko and 10 others like this

#69 Bretw01

Bretw01

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,020
  • Joined: 13 Feb 2017
  • Loc: IL USA

Posted 26 August 2020 - 10:42 AM

Nice Images Bret! I agree, I usually do 5 minute subs with my refractor. I have done 10 minute subs also. The 10 minute subs were really clean.

Thanks Mike. It was your work with this filter that made me decide to try it.  One of my better astro purchase decisions!


  • elmiko likes this

#70 elmiko

elmiko

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,914
  • Joined: 27 Jul 2009
  • Loc: Arizona

Posted 26 August 2020 - 12:52 PM

Brent, nice image! Who did you order the L-xtreme from? I ordered from Agena Astro they are on backorder.


Edited by elmiko, 26 August 2020 - 12:53 PM.


#71 deonb

deonb

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 334
  • Joined: 16 Jul 2020
  • Loc: WA

Posted 26 August 2020 - 01:46 PM

Slowly raises his hand and asking sheepishly...

 

I've tried one of these for the last couple of nights through a ASI294MC, and though the results while good, they aren't better than I get with a monochrome ASI1600MM with even my cheap'o Ha and Oiii filters. And integrating monochrome images into color is many times simpler than extracting unwanted colors from a color image.

 

And the cost of a mini electronic filter wheel with the above-mentioned cheap'o Ha and Oiii filters are about the same price as an Optolong L-extreme filter.

 

So what is the appeal of the L-extreme? Is this mostly for EAA?


  • terry59 likes this

#72 beeboman82

beeboman82

    Sputnik

  • *****
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2019
  • Loc: Indianapolis

Posted 26 August 2020 - 04:13 PM

I'm not using PI, but I usually create a synthetic third layer made up from ha/oiii which gives the image more depth. It's tough to describe how the colors are achieved, I usually play around with color balance/channel mixer until I like it.

I have a duo band filter processing tutorial in the making though, perhaps that'll help you! smile.gif

I would be interested in such a tutorial!



#73 Huangdi

Huangdi

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 24 Jul 2019

Posted 26 August 2020 - 04:39 PM

I would be interested in such a tutorial!


It's actually done already!

https://youtu.be/bEinmXFXEyk

I hope you can learn something from it.
  • starbuckin and BrettD like this

#74 beeboman82

beeboman82

    Sputnik

  • *****
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2019
  • Loc: Indianapolis

Posted 26 August 2020 - 04:54 PM

Slowly raises his hand and asking sheepishly...

 

I've tried one of these for the last couple of nights through a ASI294MC, and though the results while good, they aren't better than I get with a monochrome ASI1600MM with even my cheap'o Ha and Oiii filters. And integrating monochrome images into color is many times simpler than extracting unwanted colors from a color image.

 

And the cost of a mini electronic filter wheel with the above-mentioned cheap'o Ha and Oiii filters are about the same price as an Optolong L-extreme filter.

 

So what is the appeal of the L-extreme? Is this mostly for EAA?

The cost comparison isn't quite fair though if one doesn't already have a mono camera (say $1300ish for the 1600 new).  I think the multi band is targeting those only with color cameras on hand, including those wanting to stick with DSLRs, and those wanting the simplicity of acquisition (probably not on processing as you mention) compared to mono.

 

I'm sure mono is better, but this thread has shown some very nice results with muli band on color.  I think the multi band opens up some satisfying new opportunities for some imagers.  For others, I suspect these filters might be the "gateway drug" to eventually going mono.smile.gif


  • elmiko and deonb like this

#75 TareqPhoto

TareqPhoto

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 10,626
  • Joined: 20 Feb 2017
  • Loc: Ajman - UAE

Posted 26 August 2020 - 05:00 PM

It depends on which multi band filter, because the one from OPT is already very expensive, i bought my ASI1600 last month or almost 2 months for $1075, consider i buy cheaper NB or LRGB filters, so that will be even less than $2000 total, if i add a filer wheel maybe yes, but how much is that filter multiband from OPT and how much is that 294MC anyway?


  • robodan likes this


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics