I don't follow you here, my friend.
I don't use Reflectix or any shiny metalised materials in my insulation wraps. This is all about using something that works to insulate a Mak or SCT.
This is why I don't get into the technicalities of thermal properties of materials, because it confuses people & even can create & promote urban myths, of which in astro there is more than one for that matter.
I have used foam yoga mats & Coreflute to make my wraps. I tried a Reflectix type material once, a single layer on my 9" Mak & it didn't work and to add a second layer meant for a wrap that could not be removed - something I won't do is leave the wrap on the scope. So I stuck with the Coreflute & this stuff is much more robust than any Reflectix type of material.
I chanced upon insulating these scopes totally by chance. I needed to make a dewshield for the C8 I had at the time when I found a light blue yoga mat that was being thrown out. It was in great condition & my only thought was "Hmmm, this could work as a dewshield". I cut it to size, glued the ends together & slipped it on over the OTA. PRESTO! A great working dewshield. What took me a while to understand was why I was now not needing to wait for the scope to cool before ripping high magnification from it! It was Luxo that pointed out what I had achieved when I mentioned this curiosity to him! 
Foam rubber is used in wetsuits & to insulate pipes & homes & many other instances, so why not a scope? Well, it works.
Don't get so caught up in the supposed properties of materials because we are not using ANY materials in any way that they were designed for. Our use of any material is totally outside the norm. The only thing that matters is if it works to insulate a scope, then that is all that matters. And if allows for easy installation & removal, even better.
Don't see your point.
Two things to consider 1. Insulation 2. heat loss by radiation. Both in order to avoid temperature drops inside the tube.
The second needs a reflecting surface. You can spare it but then the insulation layer must be thicker or more effective.
I do fine with 4mm insulation layer and reflecting surface.
Just read the outside temperature of a dark rubber foam on the scope's upside and its under side to find a delta of maybe 5 K or even more.
A reflecting surface avoids this delta.
(I did the test with my 4mm PE foam, one with reflective surface up the other down. After 1/4 hour the delta was 7 K, after 1 hour the delta reduced to 3 K constantly for the whole night.
What happened? The upside dark foam surface started to get wet (during the night it became dropping wet which I could see by the drops on the pavement)
And condensation warmth made the wet surface warmer than it would be without water deposition.
The good thing: The surface (if it was a mirror or corrector plate) is warmer than without dew on it, the bad thing: Tough it is warmer you can't properly watch through that mist layer.
Quite sure without that latent warmth the delta was more than 10K.
That much about the use of a reflective surface.
Edited by quilty, 24 July 2023 - 02:47 AM.