A reprocess of my Double Cluster image.
This is the first image that I did, 177 x 30"
A Reprocess
Started by
Hypoxic
, Nov 30 2020 08:29 AM
4 replies to this topic
#2
Hypoxic
-
-
topic starter
- Posts: 711
- Joined: 24 Dec 2011
- Loc: Oise, France
Viking 1
Posted 30 November 2020 - 08:31 AM
This is the second image at 243 x 20" and less aggressive stretching:
JPG compression kills it, but I think the second image looks better. This is a learning process thing...
Attached Thumbnails
Edited by Hypoxic, 30 November 2020 - 08:33 AM.
#3
Tapio
-
-
- Posts: 3,617
- Joined: 24 Sep 2006
- Loc: Tampere, Finland
Soyuz
Posted 30 November 2020 - 09:06 AM
The stars are smaller in second version but somehow I like the first version better.
#4
endless-sky
-
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: 24 May 2020
- Loc: Padova, Italy
Viking 1
Posted 30 November 2020 - 10:24 AM
Normally I am all for smaller/less stars, if the nebulosity is the main subject.
In this case, I, too, prefer the first version.
In this case, I, too, prefer the first version.
#5
Hypoxic
-
-
topic starter
- Posts: 711
- Joined: 24 Dec 2011
- Loc: Oise, France
Viking 1
Posted 30 November 2020 - 11:11 AM
The stars are smaller in second version but somehow I like the first version better.
Normally I am all for smaller/less stars, if the nebulosity is the main subject.
In this case, I, too, prefer the first version.
Alright, not the results I was expecting, but it's nice to have some feedback between the two images. I guess the bigger/brighter starfield (when stars alone) is more pleasing to look at.
Your comments are much appreciated. Merci!
CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.
Recent Topics
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Am I chasing something that doesn't exist?Psionmark - Today, 07:49 AM
Beginners Forum (No astrophotography)
-
-
