Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Vignette not getting calibrated out on one side

Astrophotography Beginner
  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 astrokyle

astrokyle

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 08 Oct 2021
  • Loc: New Zealand

Posted 15 October 2021 - 03:36 AM

Hello,

 

I'm fairly new to imaging with the ASI294MC-Pro and can't figure out why the calibration of this session is not working as expected.

When stacking master dark and master flat with light frames the bottom left still shows some light streaks and has a very apparent circular feature.

 

_20211015_stacked_dark_flat_B_stretch.jpg

 

I've tried stacking with Deep Sky Stacker in various combinations of calibration frames

 

These seem okay

  • no callibration
  • dark only
  • flat only
  • flat and darkflat

However, these have the issue:

  • dark and flat
  • dark, flat, and darkflat

 

Here's a link to a Google Drive folder with a raw light, each of the above stacked images, and the calibration master files: https://drive.google...66D?usp=sharing

 

I also noticed that the stack with the flats and flat+darkflat creates a bright white vignette in the final image, almost like it's over calibrating?

 

_20211015_stacked_flat_stretch.jpg

 

Does anyone have any insights to what's going on here?

 

Thanks!



#2 jdupton

jdupton

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,832
  • Joined: 21 Nov 2010
  • Loc: Central Texas, USA

Posted 15 October 2021 - 11:58 AM

astrokyle,

 

   I don't think what you are seeing in your first image is vignetting. To me it looks like a (more or less normal but extreme) complex gradient. I would first suspect your set-up location and shielding of the imaging train.

 

   I did not find a Dark frame in the set of images you uploaded. I did a manual calibration using the raw Light, Flat, and Dark-Flat frames. (I used the Dark-Flat as a proxy for the missing Dark. That leaves Amp glow but is reasonably close for checking the frames for calibration induced errors..) (I also had trouble figuring out you naming conventions so did not look at any other frames.)

 

   In looking at the single Light, Flat, and Dark-Flat frames I see nothing out of the ordinary. There were about what might be expected. When I calibrated using the Light, Dark-Flat (for Dark), Flat and Dark-Flat, I got an image that looked just about the same as your first image in your post.

 

   Next I decided to compare the calibrated image frame I made to the original Light frame to see if vignetting was being properly removed. I think it is. The resulting brightness contour maps are shown below. The first the raw Light frame which obviously shows the vignetting. The second is the calibrated Light frame showing that all the concentric rings due to vignetting have been removed. (There is amp glow showing in the calibrated brightness contour since I could not find your raw Dark frame FITs.)

 

astrokyle_RawLightContours.jpg

Raw Light Brightness Contour Map

 

astrokyle_CalLightContours.jpg

Calibrated Light Brightness Contour Map

 

   What is left after calibration appears to me to be primarily a complex stray light gradient. The nearly parabolic shaped light radiating from the lower left of center to the upper right corner looks like light from a bright(ish) source present in the direction you were shooting. Maybe it was the Moon or it could have been a streetlight or similar artificial light coming in off axis.

 

   Based on the above, I don't really think you have a calibration problem. Your processing appears to be correct. I would look for the source of the remaining gradients somewhere else other than being processing induced.

 

 

John



#3 astrokyle

astrokyle

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 08 Oct 2021
  • Loc: New Zealand

Posted 15 October 2021 - 10:31 PM

Hi jdupton,

 

Thank you for looking into this, this has been very helpful in learning how to analyze the calibration process.

 

It's nice to know you go the same end result image. I guess I have a tough job of trying to clean up this complex gradient - any tips on this? I've been playing around with the dynamic background extraction in Pixinsight - it's somewhat helping.

 

I do have a streetlight nearby that may have been reflecting off the metal backyard fence or the side of the telescope. I will have to shield this off on the next clear night and see if the same pattern emerges.

 

Thanks for the help!



#4 Ryou

Ryou

    Messenger

  • -----
  • Posts: 419
  • Joined: 10 Apr 2020

Posted 16 October 2021 - 12:13 AM

I'd suggest giving Astro Pixel Processor a try vs Deep Sky Stacker. Nothing against the later, however when I swapped over from a DSLR to an Astro camera I had a bunch of issues with it for some reason. It also works fairly well to remove gradients and normalize the background through the background calibration and Light Pollution tools. I've had some highly gradiated images due to light pollution and it took care of them pretty easily.

 

That all said it never hurts to double check your calibration frame process. Was the flat evenly illuminated? Peak about 50% on the histogram? Taken at same focus position as light? Also note that as things cool/warm the focus could change, so I wouldn't try to take a flat in the middle of the day even if you knew the focuser position.



#5 freebin

freebin

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 24 Mar 2021
  • Loc: Bortle 8

Posted 16 October 2021 - 12:28 AM

I have a very similar issue when the light from the laptop screen pollutes the mirror of my newtonian from underneath.



#6 OrionSword

OrionSword

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 534
  • Joined: 14 Aug 2010
  • Loc: Colorado

Posted 16 October 2021 - 08:58 AM

See our discussion of this camera model on this thread, I posted a sample of my flat at thread #13 even though the monochrome model and how to adjust for it as well as another member.  Flats with the 294 look strange compared to what we are used to but exposures of 3-5s generating a 5000-10000 ADU appear to help it to calibrate properly.

 

https://www.cloudyni...-color-pattern/




CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Astrophotography, Beginner



Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics