

Posted 18 October 2006 - 06:50 AM
Posted 18 October 2006 - 08:28 AM
Posted 18 October 2006 - 09:24 AM
Posted 18 October 2006 - 09:27 AM
Posted 18 October 2006 - 03:57 PM
Posted 18 October 2006 - 04:33 PM
Posted 18 October 2006 - 05:05 PM
Posted 18 October 2006 - 07:17 PM
Posted 18 October 2006 - 07:49 PM
is this like multiple chioce any or all of the above will qualify the scope , or only if it meets all the criteria.
In production scopes:
...The scope must be either:
In a home brew scope must meet at least one of the following...:
Posted 18 October 2006 - 09:48 PM
Gee, I guess that answers that.
Posted 18 October 2006 - 10:41 PM
Posted 18 October 2006 - 10:54 PM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 11:39 AM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 01:30 PM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 02:31 PM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 03:42 PM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 03:56 PM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 07:19 PM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:14 PM
And where can I find this information? Who decided this?
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:19 PM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:33 PM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:36 PM
Fairly good bracketing there, Daren, but here's one for you– the Edmund Astroscan.
I'd put it in the classic category, even though it's still in production.
Posted 26 October 2006 - 08:55 PM
I was a very early subscriber of TSM. You're preaching to the choir here. Last I heard, it was permissible to ask someone for their source. You don't mind that, do you Mr. Bledsoe?
Posted 26 October 2006 - 09:00 PM
Posted 26 October 2006 - 09:11 PM
![]() Cloudy Nights LLC Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics |