Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Spica, a Possible Quadruple Star System

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 james7ca

james7ca

    Hubble

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 13,618
  • Joined: 21 May 2011
  • Loc: San Diego, CA

Posted 17 March 2022 - 06:35 AM

Spica (Alpha Virginis) is the fifteenth brightest star in the night sky, a spectroscopic double, and the brightest member of a class of stars known as ellipsoidal variables. The primary (Spica A) consists of two stars (Aa and Ab) that orbit so closely together that they are distorted into ellipsoids whose cross-section area and thus brightness varies as they present different aspects of their shapes to the observer. However, this variation may only be by 0.03 magnitudes and thus impossible to detect visually. It also seems that Spica A is a beta Cephei variable with a short 4 hour period that is superimposed on the changes caused by the rotation of the primaries (although one source claims that the beta Cephei pulses stopped around 1970).

 

As of 1985 and according to the paper "The Ellipsoidal Variable Stars" as published in the Astrophysical Journal there are only twenty documented ellipsoidal variable stars. Thus, Spica is indeed a rare type of star.

 

In addition to the closely spaced primaries (Aa and Ab), this system has two additional, fainter, and widely separated members that were first cataloged by astronomer S. W. Burnham in 1879. These other two stars are known as Spica AB and AC and are listed in the Washington Double Star Catalog (WDS) as "uncertain" members of the Spica system. The magnitudes, separations from Spica A, and position angles of these two stars are shown below (as taken from the Stelle Doppie web site):

 

AB   12.00  151.9"  33°

AC   10.50  367.3"  61°

 

Oddly, there is a fifth entry in the WDS for another star of magnitude 7.5 that is separated from Spica A by just 0.5 arc seconds. I suspect this is in error as it was first reported in 1975 and apparently (?) never observed since. That said, a star of that magnitude so close to a first magnitude star would undoubtedly be very difficult to see (perhaps a task best confirmed by the Hubble Space Telescope).

 

Okay, so enough with the preliminaries and on to my contribution.

 

I'm currently "testing" a Laida Optics 50mm aperture finder/guide scope with an inexpensive Astromania 2X barlow to see whether that combination can be used to create a compact, long-focus guide scope for increased image scale. Thus, a few days ago while under a bright gibbous moon I decided to take some images using that combination as a 50mm, f/7.8 "astrograph" grin.gif.

 

Below is the result, an RGB image of the multiple star system Spica showing components AB and AC.

 

The limiting reach on this image is somewhat beyond the 14th magnitude and the brightest field star has a magnitude of 10.8 (TYC 5547-1507-1, as labeled in my image). Spica AC looks slightly fainter than this and AC's visual magnitude as reported by SkySafari when calculated from the GAIA data is 11.3.

 

Although I refocused at each filter change you can see that there is still a good amount of blue and red bloat. However, the green-filtered image wasn't too bad, as witness this link to an image of the moon that I took that same night ( __Gibbous Moon with Laida Guide Scope__ ).

 

The red diffraction spikes are apparently an interaction between the poor color correction of this inexpensive achromat and the micro-lensing of the ASI178MM camera (the latter not usually visible except when a bright star is grossly overexposed).

 

C&C welcomed and thanks for looking.

Attached Thumbnails

  • Spica with Laida Optics 50mm Guide Scope (small).jpg

Edited by james7ca, 17 March 2022 - 03:04 PM.

  • R Botero, Ljubo, PhotonHunter1 and 6 others like this

#2 Mike in Rancho

Mike in Rancho

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,855
  • Joined: 15 Oct 2020
  • Loc: Alta Loma, CA

Posted 17 March 2022 - 01:45 PM

James you really do interesting stuff with both unique (hey let's try this!) equipment, and multiple star systems.  smile.gif

 

Do you have an independent thread going for the guidescope related testing?  I'll be interested to see how that pans out, and especially if PHD2 likes it for multi-star.

 

I have considered something similar for potential guiding of longer imaging.  I have the SVB 50mm guide scope, claimed to be 190mm but I haven't solved it to check.  Currently used with a converted webcam, OSC, pretty small chip, and 3 micron pixels, but I seem to get reasonably good guiding.  However, the only cheap Astromania 1.25 Barlow I currently have on the shelf is the 3x, not the 2x.  And I figured that's too much to even bother testing.



#3 james7ca

james7ca

    Hubble

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 13,618
  • Joined: 21 May 2011
  • Loc: San Diego, CA

Posted 17 March 2022 - 01:58 PM

Mike, thanks for the notice. As for guide scope testing or setups, this particular trial of mine was kind of motivated by the following thread:

 

  https://www.cloudyni.../#entry11741436

 

With the most relevant post (by me) being this entry:

 

  https://www.cloudyni...3#entry11751943

 

In any case, sharp-eyed individuals might be able to detect another apparent double in my image. There are two 14th magnitude stars that have a separation of just under 5 arc seconds that were recorded in this image. A check of the GAIA data indicates that both of these stars have approximately the same parallax and proper motion, so they may be a true physical pair.



#4 imtl

imtl

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 9,015
  • Joined: 07 Jun 2016
  • Loc: Down in a hole

Posted 17 March 2022 - 02:10 PM

James, I just love your posts. :D


  • james7ca likes this


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics