MarMax,
Any of those post-processing techniques available to augment the views during a live session in say SharpCap? I notice more stretching in the post processed images and of course much improved color balance, both of which can be done in SharpCap.
I doubt the post workflow or anything even close could be done while live stacking. I'm saving 16-bit FITS files in addition to the "save exactly as seen" PNG files. I'm opening the FITS files in Astro Pixel Processor for stretching, noise reduction and calibration, and saving as TIFF. I'm opening the TIFFs in Photoshop 24 and running a series of plug-ins in addition to many other workflow steps. I'm mostly using the RC Astro plug-ins (GradientXTerminator, StarXTerminator and NoiseXTerminator). And sometimes finish with AFP-T sharpening.
All of the images loaded into My Gallery and presented here are low resolution (1600x1600 max) JPGs. When you look at a PNG side-by-side with a processed TIFF they are vastly different. A 1600x1600 JPG is 2Mb max and the typical full resolution TIFF is 50-150Mb depending on the sensor.
With good sky conditions, rig configuration and calibration frames you can get some really nice "save exactly as seen" PNG stacks. Especially with GC's, OC's and PN's, but for the faint fuzzies a live stack can always be improved with post work.
I've used the RGB Ultra filter four times now and IMO I've not found a live stack color balance that is better than what I get using an IDAS-LPS-D3 or UV/IR cut filter. It took some post-processing for me to see the value of the RGB Ultra filter. For live stack viewing I'd pass on the RGB Ultra in favor of another light pollution reduction filter (L-Pro, IDAS-LPS-D3, etc.).
I know there is a lot of red in everything astro, but I'm much more appreciative of any color other than red. M42 with a UV/IR filter is my favorite palette. The RGB Ultra is a bit too red for my taste.