Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

My complete and unfortunate experience with a GSO 8" f/5 newtonian reflector

Reflector Equipment Beginner Astrophotography Accessories
  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 zernikepolynomial

zernikepolynomial

    Ranger 4

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 373
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2020

Posted 26 May 2023 - 04:15 PM

Background:

 

I decided to build a new astrophotography setup which would be fairly fast. The system needed to be simple, and something you could easily collimate in the field. I realized that a f/4-f/5 newtonian would be perfect for this task, and a starizona nexus CC could make it even faster. I eventually decided on a GSO 8" f/5, because the design was simple, it could upgrade it in the future (lots of common parts for it), and with a nexus CC, I could bring the focal length down without having a bigger secondary obstruction. But more importantly, GSO's supposedly had decent optics for the price; it was not supposed to be amazing by any means, but it gave room for more important additions (like new focusers). The previous setup I was building was a slow one, and this would be the exact opposite. For the slow setup, I used a canon 6D, but for this setup I would need a different camera, so I pre-ordered Player Ones Ares-C, which is the new version of the 533mc camera. I chose that camera because the "decently" illuminated field only covered 21mm at F/5, and at F/3.75 (after installing the CC) would reduce that down to around 16mm, which is the diagonal of a 533mc. And the pixel size of the 533mc was big enough to not severely undersample at F/3.75, although it could be better; the tradeoff is speed of course. I figured drizzling could be used when exposure time was not an issue.

 

So this was kind of my philosophy when going into the setup. It could start out doing the bare minimum as a fast system, and as it was tested, it could be upgraded or transition into more of a DIY project down the road.

 

Reseller:

I chose Agena Astro, because I heard they had a "decent" reputation, and they were the few ones who had GSO telescopes in stock, as there continues to be a shortage. I later found Agena to NOT live up to their reputation for newtonian telescopes, and more is explained further in this story. I went ahead and purchased the telescope on May 13th, 2023. I had purchased the other items shortly before that. The starizona nexus came directly from starizona. Everything seemed to arrive on time, and I was pretty happy that things were lining up. Of course, the player one camera was pre-ordered, so that would be a longer wait. 

 

Unboxing:

When I opened up the telescope, everything made sense and I could not see any obvious defects or damage on the outside of the unit. Either GSO or Agena had installed the mirrors, the primary mirror cell, the spider, and the focuser. Everything except the rings and 50mm finder were put together, and I heard that some companies do not do that with newtonians.

 

The rings seemed a bit heavy and wobbly at the hinge, but they seemed functional.

GSO Rings
 

The telescope has an extreme amount of friction in the bottom ring, so rotating it in the field will be challenging. For visual use, this would be a big problem. The telescope came with a signed certificate claiming it was optically tested. This was another benefit of going with Agena Astro, but they don't give any numbers so the testing is not that meaningful, other than there is nothing glaringly obvious with the mirrors.

 

Assembling:

The telescope basically popped into the bottom rings, and I was able to clamp it down. The issue I had was since there is so much friction in the bottom rings, its hard to determine how much you have clamped down the top rings. The only way I found to gauge that the top rings are clamped down enough is by trying to wiggle them along the axis of the tube. If you cant wiggle them anymore, there should not be too much play. Putting the finder into the ring bracket was a bit tricky without scratching it up, an O-ring has to go into a forward gap, and this is forward support. You have to push down on a spring supported cylinder to slide the ring bracket onto the rear gap, which is where you could accidentally scratch the paint on the finder; I fortunately did not.

 

When sliding the finder into the shoe, tightening down the screw will be a bit wonky.

Finder Shoe
 

It never feels like its tight enough, and the entire bracket sort of ends up going where its going to go as you tighten it down; it seems like a second screw is necessary, and a set screw seems to take the place of where a second one could optionally go.
 

External Quality:

Everything on the outside looked great. Functionally, the focuser was smooth and didn't seem to have any obvious issues.

 

Internal Quality:

This is where things go down hill. The optics seemed ok, but they seemed dirty to me.

 

The collimation springs on the primary would need replacing, but that was obvious and a known issue.

Collimation Spring

 

 

The real issue was the horrific internal paint job. There was way too much loose paint, and it was like a dust.

GSO Newt Paint Job

 

This was specifically talked about in another thread, so I won't go into too much detail, but suffice to say it risked getting all over the mirrors and cleaning it off would be a pain and could void the warranty. Its possible that the optics may have more than normal dust on them already, so they might need a careful cleaning.

The spider assembly seemed sturdy and centered.

Secondary Assembly
 

I've heard some rumors that the spiders are not that good, or the secondary has issues, but the secondary mirror is adhered onto its base so I don't see how mirror pinch could be an issue. The primary mirror has a donut already on it, so precise collimation wont be a problem either, but those springs would of course need to be replaced.

 

I reached out to Agena Astro to figure out the best way to handle the paint issue. Rather than going through an exchange process or their own recommendation, it went straight into the warranty process. However, GSO claimed that the paint issue was normal, and after that Agena refused to acknowledge that this was an issue. Instead, they gave me possibly warranty voiding advice of scrubbing out the paint in the tube with isopropyl alcohol, which would only be sensible with a used item, or an item someone would have had for much longer and chose to flock. 

 

Field Testing: 

Date TBD. I will post to this thread.

 

Conclusion:

All in all, it was a great design ruined by a careless painter, bad quality control, and two companies which seem to transcend normal human desire. I will probably do one field test run and post the results at a later time, but I figured it would be beneficial to post this ASAP. I think this could be an incredible astrophotography setup, especially for a beginner, but I think there are too many issues that would scare away a beginner. In fact, I don't recommend this at all for visual use unless you get different rings. The paint issue is possible to fix, but its not really fair for a new scope under warranty, and I don't think a beginner would be comfortable going through the entire process. 

 

 

 

 



#2 Echolight

Echolight

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 9,123
  • Joined: 01 May 2020
  • Loc: Texas

Posted 26 May 2023 - 05:18 PM

You shoulda bought one of those $1600 made in Germany carbon fiber tube with made in UK 1/10 mirror from TS.



#3 TOMDEY

TOMDEY

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 14,312
  • Joined: 10 Feb 2014
  • Loc: Springwater, NY

Posted 26 May 2023 - 05:47 PM

Well... matte paints aren't really meant to be washed, scrubbed or swiped with the fingers. The blacker a paint is... the more fragile it is. The blackest paints can never be touched at all. If the telescope works and the paint stays where it is (without otherwise trying to rub it off) --- Agena probably is correct in their assessment.

 

I'd take the scope into the field and just use it. If that goes well... I'd just keep it clean and enjoy the views.    Tom


  • Jon Isaacs, SteveG, rgsalinger and 9 others like this

#4 astrokeith

astrokeith

    Vanguard

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,125
  • Joined: 14 Mar 2010
  • Loc: Surrey, UK

Posted 26 May 2023 - 05:58 PM

I'm in agreement that matt black paint will commonly rub off, by its nature.

 

A long time ago I worked in a professional observatory, where candle soot was applied to critical surfaces. It was truly deep black - but could clearly be just rubbed off.

 

Your review title is pretty damning, based on a personal opinion of how paint should be, plus you havent even tried the scope under skies yet.

 

BTW, scopes arent supposed to be easily rotated in simple clamp rings. Tubes that do this are supported on a much more complex mechanism.


  • Jon Isaacs, Bob Campbell, SteveG and 5 others like this

#5 Echolight

Echolight

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 9,123
  • Joined: 01 May 2020
  • Loc: Texas

Posted 26 May 2023 - 06:01 PM

Eventually it will get dust on the inside of the tube.

 

When I bought my old used China dob, it was dusty inside the tube.

After I finally pulled the mirror out to clean it, I gently wiped the inside of tube out with wet paper towels.

I don't remember if any of the paint came off. But I don't think I would have been shocked or dismayed if it did.


  • TOMDEY likes this

#6 MarMax

MarMax

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,367
  • Joined: 27 May 2020
  • Loc: SoCal

Posted 26 May 2023 - 07:56 PM

I've read this thread and your paint thread. You are expecting way too much for a $600 Newt.

Having recently rebuilt two different entry level 8" Newts I'd say that any Newt at this price point is a project.
  • Bob Campbell, SteveG, havasman and 4 others like this

#7 TOMDEY

TOMDEY

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 14,312
  • Joined: 10 Feb 2014
  • Loc: Springwater, NY

Posted 26 May 2023 - 09:30 PM

I've read this thread and your paint thread. You are expecting way too much for a $600 Newt.
Having recently rebuilt two different entry level 8" Newts I'd say that any Newt at this price point is a project.

Yeah --- I was thinking of mentioning that. The cost/benefit is favorable, even very generous. When I select and buy gear... I (almost always) expect and do modifications to improve performance or match my preferences.    Tom



#8 900SL

900SL

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 924
  • Joined: 11 Apr 2021
  • Loc: Helsinki

Posted 27 May 2023 - 04:47 AM

I think your expectations exceeded your budget
  • Bill Jensen, havasman, firemachine69 and 1 other like this

#9 56S

56S

    Vostok 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 127
  • Joined: 14 Apr 2023

Posted 27 May 2023 - 07:43 AM

On the issues with the finder scope, try pulling on the spring from the outside instead of trying to compress it from the inside. The mount to shoe does seem rather light weight but I have found that it provides repeatable alignment after removal and reinstalling. As for the paint issues, I see no reason to disturb the coating so it's not a problem. I have the 6" f/5 GSO.
  • Bill Jensen likes this

#10 nicknacknock

nicknacknock

    A man of many qualities, even if they are mostly bad ones

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 19,656
  • Joined: 20 Feb 2012
  • Loc: Nicosia, Cyprus

Posted 27 May 2023 - 07:57 AM

Matte paint “issues” like this are just fine. Optics can easily be cleaned with a manual blower with zero harm to the optics.

 

Rings are not meant to allow for rotation. You have to loosen them to rotate the tube and this is by design. There are dual rings specifically yo rotate Newtonian, but those are of a different kind. Possibly a bit too much felt on the bottom ring, or a bit less on the top ring. An easy fix.

 

Nothing wrong with the secondary and collimation of these scopes is a breeze. Primary mirror collimation screws can be upgraded, but again, this is not an issue as is, as long as expectations of mirror position  - when you change objects and OTA goes through gyrations to get there- are reasonable.

 

Yes, the Finder shoe can be a pain - that would be the only thing I would change for a $15 additional expense.

 

Agena followed the recommended process. They are resellers and if the manufacturer tells them that the paint is supposed to be like that, they therefore do not accept the scope as defective.

——-

 

Overall for its money the scope is just fine. Like most things in life, quality comes at a higher price.


  • Jon Isaacs, Bob Campbell, Bill Jensen and 5 others like this

#11 Spikey131

Spikey131

    Skylab

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,094
  • Joined: 07 Feb 2017

Posted 27 May 2023 - 11:59 AM

If you buy this Teeter 8” Dob, you will have none of these problems……grin.gif

 

https://mailchi.mp/4...-scope-for-sale


  • Bill Jensen likes this

#12 dnrmilspec

dnrmilspec

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,250
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2021
  • Loc: Southern Arizona

Posted 27 May 2023 - 12:38 PM

If you do not like the tight tube rings wait until you mount your camera on the scope. 

 

Let me join the crowd and say that the black paint is not an issue.   

 

Agena is stuck on this one.  If the factory says that the paint is normal then sending you another one will serve no purpose.  I suppose you could ask them to exchange it for a small refractor.  That would still be in your budget and will eliminate a world of issues.


  • Bill Jensen, SteveG, havasman and 1 other like this

#13 rgk901

rgk901

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,944
  • Joined: 28 Apr 2021
  • Loc: Beautiful Bortle 10 Midwest Skies

Posted 27 May 2023 - 02:58 PM

this tight ring issue seems to have neen around a long time, not sure why it hasn't been addressed...

what I did was to change to a thinner felt on the rings which helped ...no longer have the nice thick cushion but so far no damage and works much better


one day when I'm bored I may send them down a bit but since I don't use a gem mount I don't change positions that often

Edited by rgk901, 27 May 2023 - 02:59 PM.


#14 Oldfracguy

Oldfracguy

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 810
  • Joined: 23 Sep 2021
  • Loc: San Diego, CA

Posted 27 May 2023 - 03:37 PM

You would also have discovered that the fully-illuminated field of the GSO 6" f/5 Newtonian is pretty small, even for just visual observation.  I had one a few months ago and did some measurements on it.  The one I had was equipped with the single-speed Crayford focuser, to which I added the dual-speed modification. The distance from the surface of the primary mirror to the middle of the secondary, i.e., the focuser's optical axis, was 527 mm.  With an eyepiece installed, I measured the distance from the middle of the secondary to the focal plane as 223 mm.  Doing the calculations, with a primary of 150 mm diameter and a secondary with a 50 mm minor axis, I came up with a fully-illuminated field of only 7.7 mm, or 0.30 inch.  A fully-illuminated field of at least 0.5 inch is recommended for general visual observation, maybe a little less if using a long Newtonian for planetary viewing, but a much larger fully-illuminated field would be required for imaging.

 

Also, ScopeStuff sells sheets of black flocking material.  People have mentioned that helps quite a bit.  There was an CN article recently from a guy who modified a GSO 6" f/4:

 

https://www.cloudyni...f4-newton-r3358


Edited by Oldfracguy, 27 May 2023 - 03:42 PM.

  • Bill Jensen likes this

#15 star acres

star acres

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,991
  • Joined: 26 Dec 2022

Posted 27 May 2023 - 07:15 PM

My rings are die cast and painted but they fit differently. I don't crank down crazy tight. Yes, my tube rotates pretty easily because it's felted inside. I bet I can raise soot with my fingers but I just sweep the tube out with a paint brush. I don't approach my telescope as a critic and I'm not such an expert as to bother the manufacturer with things that only show disrespect for the product. Let it be and enjoy it, or sell the whole thing. Astronomy is about fun.
  • DAG792 likes this

#16 Oldfracguy

Oldfracguy

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 810
  • Joined: 23 Sep 2021
  • Loc: San Diego, CA

Posted 27 May 2023 - 08:45 PM

So sorry, back in Post #14 I was addressing the 6" f/5 GSO, not the 8" f/5.

 

I have also had an 8" f/5, but is wasn't a GSO, it was a Celestron C8-N.  That's the exact same OTA that is supplied with the AVX mount as a package.  That one had an undersized secondary mirror, only 52 mm major axis.  I replaced it with a 62.5 mm secondary, and got a fully-illuminated field of 0.73 inch.  It's good to know that the secondary mirror that comes with the GSO 8" f/5 is in fact a 62.5 mm size.


Edited by Oldfracguy, 27 May 2023 - 08:45 PM.

  • dave janello likes this

#17 havasman

havasman

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 15,182
  • Joined: 04 Aug 2013
  • Loc: Dallas, Texas

Posted 27 May 2023 - 09:07 PM

Background:

 

I decided to build a new astrophotography setup which would be... [whines] ...its not really fair for a new scope under warranty, and I don't think a beginner would be comfortable going through the entire process. 

Cheap mass-market Newts are raw materials from which the user can more easily make what he needs than if he made everything himself from scratch. They are not fully realized. None of 'em. They are cheap. You're in the game now and have found areas you think can be improved. Get to work and quitcherbitchin'. Your whiney post contains nothing that's news. If that really is the complete story then yes, you're probably SOL and it's neither Agena nor GSO's fault.

 

Sometimes even 12.5" fully custom spec'd, very expensive "premium" Newts made by hallowed makers arrive as a POS and must first be returned to the maker for drastic disassembly fixes and even after that analyzed and reconfigured if they're going to work at all. Forum posts do not get those fixed either.

 

Ref: the James Baldwin quote below


Edited by havasman, 27 May 2023 - 09:20 PM.


#18 Bob Campbell

Bob Campbell

    Soyuz

  • ****-
  • Posts: 3,531
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2004
  • Loc: Scottsdale, AZ

Posted 27 May 2023 - 09:09 PM

I'm in agreement that matt black paint will commonly rub off, by its nature.

 

A long time ago I worked in a professional observatory, where candle soot was applied to critical surfaces. It was truly deep black - but could clearly be just rubbed off.

 

Your review title is pretty damning, based on a personal opinion of how paint should be, plus you havent even tried the scope under skies yet.

 

BTW, scopes arent supposed to be easily rotated in simple clamp rings. Tubes that do this are supported on a much more complex mechanism.

"where candle soot was applied to critical surfaces"

 

yes, the classic name for this is 'lamp black' since it came from the residue of burning whale oil. Near zero reflectivity.

 

Bob



#19 Bob Campbell

Bob Campbell

    Soyuz

  • ****-
  • Posts: 3,531
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2004
  • Loc: Scottsdale, AZ

Posted 27 May 2023 - 09:13 PM

If you do not like the tight tube rings wait until you mount your camera on the scope. 

 

Let me join the crowd and say that the black paint is not an issue.   

 

Agena is stuck on this one.  If the factory says that the paint is normal then sending you another one will serve no purpose.  I suppose you could ask them to exchange it for a small refractor.  That would still be in your budget and will eliminate a world of issues.

I would be extremely surprised if they would go for a newt-->refractor replacement. AA is very picky about their return policy, and this 'defect' likely does not qualify.

 

Bob



#20 dnrmilspec

dnrmilspec

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,250
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2021
  • Loc: Southern Arizona

Posted 27 May 2023 - 10:26 PM

I would be extremely surprised if they would go for a newt-->refractor replacement. AA is very picky about their return policy, and this 'defect' likely does not qualify.

 

Bob

I would not blame them at all.  I do not see anything about this scope that is out of spec.  If it was mine I would try to enjoy it.  Who doesn't need an 8" Newt?  Even a fast one.


  • Bob Campbell and SteveG like this

#21 DAG792

DAG792

    Messenger

  • -----
  • Posts: 425
  • Joined: 21 Mar 2020

Posted 27 May 2023 - 11:42 PM

Every Chinese Dob I've owned has that paint issue. As long as you don't touch it, you should be fine.

 

Other things you've mentioned are non-issues, primary and secondary collimation on these scopes is pretty easy, and they hold collimation well.

 

About the only thing I'd be worried about is the optical performance and the focuser. A star-test in the field should tell you a lot.

 

Optics can be pretty dirty and still perform really well. I just resolved Antares last night with my 8 inch F/5 Newt, that probably hasn't been cleaned in over a year.

 

You can flock your scope if you want, but a dew shield will likely help you more.



#22 dweller25

dweller25

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,579
  • Joined: 30 Aug 2007
  • Loc: Lancashire, UK

Posted 28 May 2023 - 01:19 AM

@zernikepolynomial

 

Click bait title, everything you discuss is normal for the price point.


  • DAG792 and 56S like this

#23 rgk901

rgk901

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,944
  • Joined: 28 Apr 2021
  • Loc: Beautiful Bortle 10 Midwest Skies

Posted 28 May 2023 - 10:07 AM

say what now? where in this description does it state this is 'normal for the price point'?

Attached Thumbnails

  • Screenshot_20230528-095822~2.png


#24 dweller25

dweller25

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,579
  • Joined: 30 Aug 2007
  • Loc: Lancashire, UK

Posted 28 May 2023 - 10:45 AM

say what now? where in this description does it state this is 'normal for the price point'?

IMG_0294.png

 

lol.gif  Do you really believe sales talk ?


Edited by dweller25, 28 May 2023 - 02:05 PM.


#25 mayhem13

mayhem13

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,504
  • Joined: 10 Jan 2021
  • Loc: New Jersey

Posted 28 May 2023 - 02:28 PM

attachicon.gifIMG_0294.png

 

lol.gif  Do you really believe sales talk ?

The seller makes the  claim, and in such accepts the responsibility of fulfilling that expectation…..if the purchaser could display that the scope was received in any condition other than that made by the sales obligation, Agena should have sent a call tag and offered either an exchange or refund. 




CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Reflector, Equipment, Beginner, Astrophotography, Accessories



Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics