I certainly think zwo has done well with this launch, the only correction to what you said is seestar does not derotate, you still lose substantial fov that needs to be cropped out on longer exposures, perhaps you were thinking of dithering… Vaonis solution to that is CovalENS and I have my doubts zwo will be able to match that, they will have a mosaic mode but I think that will be limited to just stitching, , but anyway if your curious how Vaonis plans to react to the competition then just check out the specs of Vespera pro, larger square sensor, 12mp with 32mp mosaics. No doubt ZwO may try to compete with that also but it’s speculation of if and when… by the time they do I expect stellina pro will be announced… competition is a good thing, so far seestar has not done anything new, they just managed to produce a nice unit at a lower pricepoint.. but that’s great, brings more people in to robotics…. No doubt people who really love the experience will be looking hard at what’s available for their next upgrade. As far as hestia…. It’s not really a robot… just a beginner scope, it was not intended to compete with seestar or dwarf, they have sold a ton but it was a different market segment. In robotics I think Vaonis will be able to hold their own in the higher end market….so far it’s just speculation on whether zwo will even do a high end robot….they still have to tread lightly to not cannibalize their other products and will have to decide still if they want to go all in and make robotics their primary focus…. A decision for the bean counters I guess
Yes, I too am extremely impressed with the strides made by Stellina/Vespera since they were each introduced. In addition to Coval, mosaic mode, etc.. I especially feel that the stacking algorithm used by Vaonis has tremendously improved over the years….I haven’t noticed any changes to the EVscope 2 processing over the same time period, but they may have been more subtle. Certainly, Vaonis does seem ready and eager to support their products well beyond their debut.
On the other hand, ZWO is the first “major player” to enter the smart scope arena. No kickstarter here….with all the funds, resources, marketing experience and R & D budget that implies. Their unique experience with Aisair will certainly assist in the initial and ongoing development of the interface. While Stellina has done a hell of a job developing the product since launch (IMO), I can’t see how they can compete against ZWO over the long haul. ZWO made sure to match the Stellina in terms of it’s user friendliness….it also can de-rotate, autofocus, apply heating to counter dew, will not require collimation, etc…These “convenience” features really add up to a hassle free user experience…….the EVscope 2 and it’s variants simply do not measure up in this regard, leaving only Vaonis as the competition.
At this point in time, as compared to the Stellina, the single most glaring deficiency of the ZWO S50 is the aperture size. While Vaonis has a few exclusive (for now) software tricks in it’s bag (mosaic mode, expert mode, CovalENS, etc), no doubt ZWO will introduce similar enhancements in short order. Still, 80mm vs 50mm is a tough stat to overcome.However, let’s not forget that ZWO includes a solar filter AND carry case,.….and costs just over 1/8 of what the Stellina does. 1/8 is not just “less expensive”, it is quite literally a fraction of the cost of the Stellina.
At this point in time, I believe the Vaonis Stellina is still “king” of the smart telescope field in terms of what I consider to be the most important category…..picture quality and ease of data capture/retrieval. However, even now at it’s launch, ZWO already offers a more versatile (solar out of the box), portable (size, weight, included case) and economical product.
I have no personal experience with the Vespera, but I will be curious as to how the pic quality will stack up against the S50, considering it has the same apeture and would make for a more appropriate comparison. While the Vaonis head start and demonstrated expertise at stacking algorithms will be a formidable initial advantage, I just can’t see ZWO missing an opportunity to squash the competition while still in infancy. Hestia is a whiles away, and Hyperion is no doubt a niche product (if it even exists at all, as I haven’t heard of even a single unit out in the wild). I simply cannot see a scenario whereby Vaonis can withstand such a competitive challenge. At least, that’s how I see things playing out.Either way, we can both agree to disagree on the above points…..while at the same time, both eagerly looking towards the future.
Once they develop the line over the next few years (s80?, s100? S120!)……no fuss EAA heaven awaits us all!