Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

What is the Questar lure?

  • Please log in to reply
558 replies to this topic

#551 kansas skies

kansas skies

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,643
  • Joined: 02 Dec 2012
  • Loc: The middle of nowhere, USA

Posted 16 April 2025 - 05:21 AM

Since I haven't parted with a scope in quite a few years, I currently have a room bursting at the seams with my prized collection. The lineup now includes everything from little bitty to downright cumbersome. Now that I have joined the ranks of the retired, I was hoping to have a little more free time to make use of them all, since each and every one holds a place very dear to my heart. Unfortunately, a large part of my reason for retiring at this time was due to continual back problems, so until I get that issue worked out, the larger scopes will have to take a back seat to those that are a considerably more manageable. I might even have to give serious consideration to selling a few, but I'm really not in any hurry to do so at the moment. Fortunately, among my collection is a late seventies Questar Standard that I've grown to depend on almost exclusively. With my modified ETX tripod and hand-held Lion inverter, I can be setup and ready to go on pretty much a moment's notice. My personal experience is that the Questar really does provide very close to refractor-like performance without false color, with the only trade-off being a slightly thicker first diffraction ring. In addition, Questar somehow figured out how to reduce the time required to thermally stabilize the scope to that of a small refractor as well.

 

On another note, I also own a late-model goto version of the ETX-90, which is a rather nice scope as well. I found the plastic goto mount to be pretty much unusable, so I removed the OTA and adapted it for use with a Vixen Polaris mount. Setup in this manner, it is much more comfortable to use, although I have to say that, in my opinion, it's still no match to the convenience and optical performance of the Questar.

 

Bill


  • rcwolpert and Bomber Bob like this

#552 CHASLX200

CHASLX200

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 44,448
  • Joined: 29 Sep 2007
  • Loc: Tampa area Florida

Posted 16 April 2025 - 06:00 AM

I saw one last week. Sure is nice to look at.



#553 photoracer18

photoracer18

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,248
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2013
  • Loc: Martinsburg, WV

Posted 18 April 2025 - 04:37 PM

54? or 57?

The company was founded in 1950 but the first scopes were produced in 1954.



#554 photoracer18

photoracer18

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,248
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2013
  • Loc: Martinsburg, WV

Posted 18 April 2025 - 04:48 PM

54? or 57?

The company was founded in 1950 but the first scopes were produced in 1954.

 

when you have as many scopes as I do it is hard to use them all on a regular basis.   You just pick what is handy.  They all provide amazing images depending on conditions.   It is like any scope. You look through one at the wrong time you do not get a favorable impression. 

I try to keep a few that are handy with mounts near my sliding glass door to my deck. All with metal tripod legs so as to prevent my cat from getting any ideas about  the similarity of wooden legs to scratching posts.


  • Bomber Bob likes this

#555 Latetothestarparty

Latetothestarparty

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 66
  • Joined: 05 Dec 2022
  • Loc: Denham Springs, La

Posted Yesterday, 11:12 AM

An interesting side affect of my 3.5 Q is that in a peculiar way…it is saving me money. My other scopes always had me looking for any good deal on an eyepiece. As with others, I have more than I need but could never pass up a good deal on eBay. Since many eyepieces do not come in-focus with the Q finder, I no longer feel that desire to hunt or buy other eyepieces …gone, zilch…finished. Killing a addiction is hard but it is gone!  Thank you Q. AND to think how many eyepieces I could have bought with the money I put on my Q. (Just thought I’d ad that before the na-sayers did.)


  • Bomber Bob likes this

#556 Bomber Bob

Bomber Bob

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 24,731
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2013
  • Loc: The Swamp, LA (Lower Alabama)

Posted Yesterday, 12:07 PM

Early on, I put the TV 1.25" Adapter on my '58 Standard, so I'd have a wide range of magnifications...  I haven't tried my AT Paradigms or Vixen LV's with the Q Finder; but, out of dozens of other new & old eyepieces, the only one that is compatible is... a 50-year old Jaegers 16mm Erfle.



#557 Airship

Airship

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Joined: 07 Mar 2014
  • Loc: Dayton, Ohio

Posted Yesterday, 01:13 PM

Yeah, I tinkered with the TV visual port adapter on my 1969 Standard for a while, but eventually migrated back to the stock eyepieces. For me, they work perfectly for most of my viewing. If I want something else I’ll mount the TV adapter onto the axial port along with a 1.25” star diagonal.

 

I never felt the lure of the Questar, but now that I own one I really appreciate that it just works. It offers the best performance that I have seen in a 3.5” scope and the lowest fiddle factor of just about any scope that I have ever used. It’s the perfect companion for a relaxing evening out under the stars.


  • Steve C. and Bomber Bob like this

#558 RichA

RichA

    Hubble

  • *****
  • Posts: 13,499
  • Joined: 03 Jun 2010
  • Loc: Toronto, Canada

Posted Yesterday, 04:13 PM

I would like to ask with all due respect, what makes a Questar, a 90mm non-goto telescope worth thousands of dollars?

Of course I understand about specs and quality, but it seems there must be nostalgia or collectability that makes them

demand such a high price.

I had a Meade EXT 90 for a few years and it was a wonderful scope but it only retailed for about $600.

Thanks for your time here.

You'd have to have used or owned one to understand why they cost what they do.

Speaking as someone who has owned 6 Questars and probably 40 Meade ETX's.



#559 Airship

Airship

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Joined: 07 Mar 2014
  • Loc: Dayton, Ohio

Posted Yesterday, 05:56 PM

I dearly luvs my ETXs! I own at least one of each major variant of the ETX including several ETX-90s. I haven't compared my 90s with my Q yet, but I can day that as nice as the ETX-90 is, it's not a Questar. That's absolutely okay, the Questar isn't an ETX-90 either.

Personally, I'm not a huge fan of comparing my scopes, it's kinda like comparing your kids. 😀
  • deSitter likes this


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics