I've already read it. Remember, roses have thorns. 
I keep coming back to this: What other binoviewer can be moved easily among all my different telescopes without needing a Barlow or OCS to come to focus?
Mike
Why is the use of an OCS/barlow such a sticking point?
Yes, using one does scale up the eyepiece focal length and magnification, but all it is, is the equivalent of imposing a limit to the clear aperture, which the linear binoviewer also imposes.
I see the situation as half a dozen of one vs 6 of the other.
With the linear binoviewer you get the native focal length of the eyepiece and it is nominally parfocal, but you impose a limit to the eyepiece field stop which limits which eyepieces are compatible with the binoviewer.
With a large prism binoviewer + OCS, you have to live with a scaling factor for your eyepiece focal length and all that entails, but you can use essentially any 1.25” eyepiece in.
In the end the lowest possible magnification and largest possible true field of view are very similar for either setup and the same is probably true for image quality.
Is the case the same for the top end of the magnification range?
I’ve never used a linear binoviewer so I have no idea.