Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Tasco 7TE-5 60/1000 from 1968

  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#26 Joe Cepleur

Joe Cepleur

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,621
  • Joined: 18 Mar 2010
  • Loc: Dark North Woods

Posted 06 March 2024 - 06:28 AM

Yes, the inherent flaw of slow refractors is difficulty getting low-power views. With 1.25" you can use up to a 40mm Plossl with a AFOV that maxes out the barrel, about 45 degrees. Still it is fun to use these scopes in period context. Also fun to run them up to maximum tripod height and look straight through, UP at the sky, no diagonal.

-drl

I suspect that the problem of the narrow field of view is often mis-attributed wholly to the inherent properties of the long focal length, when a surprising amount of it is actually due to a killer-narrow baffle in the draw tube. For my honorable, but not not valuable, f/15 Jason 313, I removed that baffle. For my collectable f/16.7 Tasco 7te-5, I stored the original draw tube in the cabinet, and replaced it with a new one without a baffle. Both draw tubes were then flocked and converted to accept 1.25" diagonals and oculars, resulting in notably wider fields of view and brighter images.

Note that the success with the Jason 313 occurred despite its draw tube being an odd, narrow size that I could not replace, because a 1.25" draw tube would not fit into the focuser. Furthermore, in the first iteration of its conversion to 1.25" when its narrow baffle was not removed, the scope was not improved so much as it became the King of Kidney-Beaning. The wider field of the 1.25" diagonal and ocular were simply allowing them to see the baffle! This illustrates the importance of eliminating the choke point of that narrow baffle.

Neither scope shows as wide an image as a faster scope would allow, but long focus scopes are capable of wider views than they were originally designed to show.

Edited by Joe Cepleur, 06 March 2024 - 09:04 AM.


#27 Terra Nova

Terra Nova

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 33,334
  • Joined: 29 May 2012
  • Loc: Kentucky, just south of the Ohio River

Posted 06 March 2024 - 07:41 AM

It looks almost identical to the Monolux 4388 (circa 1961, Astro Optical Company) that I sold a year ago just before I moved.

Attached Thumbnails

  • IMG_7714.jpeg

  • Scott in NC, Bomber Bob and reverse_syzygy like this

#28 Kasmos

Kasmos

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 7,713
  • Joined: 19 Aug 2015
  • Loc: So Cal

Posted 06 March 2024 - 04:07 PM

I have a bunch of 60mm scopes including Unitron, Goto, Vixen, and two of the best ones are the slightly shorter Tasco RAO 60/910mm 227x (early 7T-E), and the Soligor that now has a objective from a 7TE-5. This tells me something.  


  • Scott in NC, Bomber Bob and reverse_syzygy like this

#29 reverse_syzygy

reverse_syzygy

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 385
  • Joined: 19 Aug 2021
  • Loc: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Posted 25 February 2025 - 06:51 PM

If it's OK, I'd like to add my quick attempt at Jupiter with my 1966 7te-5 and a modern ASI662 in lousy seeing.

 

gallery_378970_17668_42254.png
And Luna with a GX85 m43:
gallery_378970_17668_7291972.png

Edited by reverse_syzygy, 25 February 2025 - 06:54 PM.

  • Scott in NC, Bomber Bob, Garyth64 and 1 other like this

#30 Scott in NC

Scott in NC

    Refractor Aficionado

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 40,574
  • Joined: 05 Mar 2005
  • Loc: NC

Posted 25 February 2025 - 09:56 PM

Very nice! And thanks for finding this thread that I started nearly a year ago but had completely forgotten about. It’s been a long time since I’ve taken this scope out at night, but last April I took the 7TE-5 out for white light solar observing and was treated to some nice sharp sunspot views through Meade 26-32mm Plossls with a Baader solar film filter. I need to do that again one day soon!


  • reverse_syzygy likes this

#31 reverse_syzygy

reverse_syzygy

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 385
  • Joined: 19 Aug 2021
  • Loc: Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Posted 26 February 2025 - 09:19 AM

You're welcome!

I picked mine up a few years ago on the cheap.  
I was pretty green at the time (I still am,) but time thought the visual images looked "pretty sharp to me.  good contrast, I guess."  

 

I was suprised not to see any imaging in thread which is why I added the above.

I want to spend more time trying planetary imaging.   The moon looks pretty decent to me.  Might be limited by the m43 camera.

Heck, I've an EQ6r.  I might play around with trying DSO this summer for kicks.

 

Still looking for a better 1.25" solution that the straight pipe coupling thing I have.

(part of me wants to get a few better 0.965"s)


  • Scott in NC and Bomber Bob like this

#32 konrad

konrad

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,110
  • Joined: 23 Mar 2016
  • Loc: South Africa Johannesburg

Posted 27 February 2025 - 11:01 AM

yes a wondefull scope for its size had one for many years and converted to 1.25 , also have the bigger 10-TE 




CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics