Took my 90 out yesterday afternoon for a quick solar test run with the sun funnel I made over the weekend. I didn't have a lot of time since I set up in the back yard and trees were to soon be a problem. One thing I noticed that I hadn't noticed last time I had it out at night was the tracking seemed to have trouble keeping up with the sun. So, that made me wonder, was the problem that I need to adjust my tracking speed for the sun, or could it be the additional weight of the sun funnel (which can't be that much I wouldn't think), or is it just normal slop in the ETX drives? I do know the drives have the typical ETX backlash, but I wondered if anyone else has encountered this while doing solar observing?

ETX 90 Tracking speed, weight, or slop?
#1
Posted 19 March 2024 - 10:03 AM
#2
Posted 19 March 2024 - 11:00 AM
I don't know if I would add any extras to an ETX in any case, but yes there is slop in the motions which can be somewhat improved by disassembling the entire thing and tweaking the worm gears.
Don't overtighten the altitude axis! Too much of this can break the ABS plastic axle. Grease can work its way into the clutch and make it slip.
As for tracking - the Sun moves roughly its own diameter in 12 hours. So sidereal tracking with occasional tweaks are all that is needed. If you have tracking so off that you can't keep up, either your polar alignment is way off or there is a problem in the gear train. The plastic gears can strip and break.
-drl
- jrussell likes this
#3
Posted 19 March 2024 - 11:17 AM
An easy way to test with the additional weight is an issue or there is a problem in the drive is put the Autostar in the mode were it reads out the Alt and Az of the scope. Now slew it through 15 degrees or more on both axis and compare the reading on the Autostar to that on the analog circles. They should agree almost perfectly if there is no issue.
- Dave
- deSitter and jrussell like this
#4
Posted 21 March 2024 - 04:28 AM
Are the clutches tight ?
Once the slop in the gearbox is taken up the tracking should be steady, discounting any Periodic Error .
David's 15 degree test checks the optical encoders, which are used for accurate GoTo's, but not during tracking.
Check the tracking rate is on sidereal, not moon or custom.
In sidereal it should track the sun for some time before requiring recentering.
Or set the tracking rate to custom:
Here's what expert AndrewJ said previously:
"Basically, inside the firmware there is sidereal, lunar, custom.
To change the rate for solar, you need to use the custom option and enter -3.
( ie 99.7% of sidereal )".
- jrussell likes this
#5
Posted 21 March 2024 - 08:47 AM
One bit of information that wasn't provided, was what setup mode was the mount in ? Was it polar aligned equatorial mode or Alt/Az mode ? In either case since the scope was tracking the Sun ie in the daytime the simple reason why the tracking was off was that the alignment was off since there are no stars visible to do an accurate alignment. The difference between Solar rate and the default Sidereal rate is very small so if the scope was correctly aligned you would only see the drift after about an hour and it would still be small.
- Dave
- jrussell likes this
#6
Posted 21 March 2024 - 09:27 AM
One bit of information that wasn't provided, was what setup mode was the mount in ? Was it polar aligned equatorial mode or Alt/Az mode ? In either case since the scope was tracking the Sun ie in the daytime the simple reason why the tracking was off was that the alignment was off since there are no stars visible to do an accurate alignment. The difference between Solar rate and the default Sidereal rate is very small so if the scope was correctly aligned you would only see the drift after about an hour and it would still be small.
- Dave
I do a daytime alignment in alt-az mode and just assume the alignment stars are present in the FOV. If you point it accurately north and get it level to begin with, this is plenty good for long tracking, if not go-to operation. Of course all subsequent motion of the scope must be done by slewing with the handbox.
-drl
Edited by deSitter, 21 March 2024 - 09:28 AM.
- jrussell likes this
#7
Posted 21 March 2024 - 09:39 AM
Not sure if you have done this already or not, but you can add the sun as an asteroid to the AutoStar and it will then track it. Here is the info to use for adding it:
Name: Sun
epoch: 1.5 jan 2000
eccentricity: 0.016710
semi major axis: 1
inclination: -0.0001
long asc node: 168.7394
arg of peri: 114.2078
mean anomaly: 357.5172
abs mag: -12
mag slope: 0
#8
Posted 21 March 2024 - 11:00 AM
I do a daytime alignment in alt-az mode and just assume the alignment stars are present in the FOV. If you point it accurately north and get it level to begin with, this is plenty good for long tracking, if not go-to operation. Of course all subsequent motion of the scope must be done by slewing with the handbox.
-drl
I agree this works but any drift in tracking the Sun can easily be explained on how accurate the calibration alignment was done. So I would look for the most obvious reason and then go from there. If the readout mode test of slewing the scope and comparing the results from the hand box to the analog circles show no problem with the Sun Funnel attached then that shows there is no mechanical reason for the tracking drift. The difference between Solar rate and the default Sidereal rate result in a 1 degree difference in 24 hours. With the Sun being a 1/2 degree in diameter it would take 12 hours to drift out the field of view if the alignment was perfect. So the drive rate doesn't seem to be the problem.
- Dave
#9
Posted 21 March 2024 - 11:13 AM
Thanks for the additional info and suggestions. Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to try it out again. RL getting in the way and we've had pretty much nothing but clouds lately. There have been times during the day that the sun's been out, but by the time I've gotten home clouds have been starting to, or have moved in again.
Randy, I have done that but I wasn't using it the day I was testing though. I had just done the easy alignment then slewed to the sun.
Regarding my setup I was in Alt/Az mode.
ETA: I probably shouldn't have even been trying the sun funnel on it since it's not recommend to use them with any kind of reflector but I was wanting to try it out and try tracking the sun. Basically trying to cram 50 lbs of crap into a 5 lb bag time-wise. Hopefully in the days leading up to the eclipse we'll get some sun and I can try again.
Edited by jrussell, 21 March 2024 - 11:18 AM.
#10
Posted 21 March 2024 - 11:21 AM
Thanks for the additional info and suggestions. Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to try it out again. RL getting in the way and we've had pretty much nothing but clouds lately. There have been times during the day that the sun's been out, but by the time I've gotten home clouds have been starting to, or have moved in again. I'm hoping this isn't foreshadowing of the weather on April 8.
Randy, I have done that but I wasn't using it the day I was testing though. I had just done the easy alignment then slewed to the sun.
Regarding my setup I was in Alt/Az mode.
There is a setup step that sometimes is overlooked - you must manually rotate the scope in azimuth counterclockwise until it stops (hard stop inside), THEN rotate clockwise back to N. Otherwise the scope may run into a hard stop during operation. This would probably not damage the scope but the tracking would end. The orientation of the base should be such that the control panel faces due west. So setup steps are
1) Level tripod and install base such that the control panel faces due west
2) Unlock azimuth and rotate CCW until the stop is encountered, then rotate CW back due N and lock
3) Level OTA barrel and lock altitude
4) Do a simple alignment and just hit ENTER when prompted to center alignment stars.
5) Use the handbox to slew to the Sun
Also - remember to allow for magnetic north if using a compass! Scope has to be pointed true north in home position.
-drl
- jrussell likes this
#11
Posted 01 April 2024 - 03:21 PM
Great. Now the gears are skipping again. This scope is really trying my patience.
#12
Posted 03 April 2024 - 10:55 AM
So if I crack open this thing again and clean all the grease out of it (assuming that's the problem), what should I use to replace the grease? Also, what would be the best thing to clean the grease? I've used Mean Green to clean grease before, but not on plastic parts.
#13
Posted 03 April 2024 - 11:18 AM
If the gears are slipping something else is wrong. Either one of the gears has had the teeth chewed up or a gear is slipping on it's shaft or the plastic housing assembly is cracked. I have seen all these problems in the ones I have repaired.
- Dave
#15
Posted 03 April 2024 - 04:36 PM
The other 2 screw holes are more important (the ones you have empty in that photo) as they hold the gear box stable in the base. When those are tightened snugly and you move the motor with the clutch locked do you see the gear box flexing? If not, then that screw may not matter much that it is stripped.
I see a LOT of grease on the worm gear and some is on the large metal gear surface where it meets the round metal disk. I would remove some of that grease and clean all those clutch parts as grease on those flat surfaces will cause slippage.
When you have the clutch tightened and you test the motors back and forth, also look at the large white gear on the end of the worm gear. I just had one last week I fixed as that white gear was slipping at times. It is press fit onto the tapered brass shaft of the worm gear and then a screw is on the end of it to help hold it in place. The one I fixed had grease that had seeped down into it and was causing slipping intermittently. I cleaned it off, press fit the white gear back onto it, tightened it down with the screw... I applied Loctite to the screw to keep it in place. At the same time, be sure there is little play in the worm gear in its bracket. If too loose, you can tighten the nut at the other end and use Loctite on that too.
#16
Posted 03 April 2024 - 07:27 PM
If y’all have any other ideas what else I should take care of let me know.
Edited by jrussell, 03 April 2024 - 07:29 PM.
#17
Posted 03 April 2024 - 10:45 PM
So here's where I ended up tonight. Cleaned up the excess grease from the gears and tried to come up with a way to take care of the stripped screw problems. Turns out both the first screw I suspected as well as the other one weren't going as tight as they needed. The one in the middle had split badly and was missing a piece and I had epoxied it back together the last time I worked on it. The other one I had tried to epoxy but wasn't able to get the two pieces to come back together. Decided to give it a try without doing anything about that problem and when I tried it, it turned ok at first, then started the skipping again. I had checked all the gears and they looked fine. I tried it a couple more times and I noticed the torque on the gear box was getting worse. I opened it back up to find the piece for the center screw had broken again even worse than the last time. The epoxy from last time obviously didn't hold up and I'm not sure as bad as it is that it's worth trying again. My only other idea is really a last resort and that's to glue or epoxy the two halves of the gearbox together. I'm pretty much out of ideas other than that. I guess if it doesn't work it's time to throw in the towel on this mount.
Also as an added bonus when I was deforking the OTA a small plastic piece broke off and I can't find where it came from, but I can hear another small plastic part rattle inside the fork arm. Of course it's the side with the DEC drive so that may be shot too I just haven't looked into it yet.
#18
Posted 04 April 2024 - 05:41 AM
For example, something like this cut to the length you need if it was the correct diameter.
https://a.co/d/2kPbhia
#19
Posted 04 April 2024 - 07:03 AM
#20
Posted 04 April 2024 - 07:07 AM
That part appears to be fairly straight forward from what we can see of it. I'd draw that thing up in Fusion and 3D print a CF reinforced PLA part and just replace it. Do you or a friend have a 3D printer?
#21
Posted 04 April 2024 - 08:51 AM
I don't have one but I have a friend and someone at work that do have a 3D printer. I'm actually kind of surprised that as many ETX's as there are out there with miscellaneous problems with the gear box that a full set of gears and a gear box haven't been drawn up for 3D printing. At least if there is a file or files out there that exist I haven't found them.
#22
Posted 04 April 2024 - 04:10 PM
Gday jrussell
There are several designs of gearbox and i havent heard of people printing them yet
but several people have tried printing the gears for Meade gearboxes ie
https://www.printabl...eplacement-gear
Not sure how robust they were tho.
Andrew Johansen Melbourne Australia
#23
Posted 04 April 2024 - 09:25 PM
#24
Posted 13 April 2024 - 06:32 PM
- Skywatchr likes this