Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Leslie Peltier's 12" Alvan Clark Finds a New Home

  • Please log in to reply
123 replies to this topic

#1 jragsdale

jragsdale

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,760
  • Joined: 07 Dec 2015
  • Loc: Idaho

Posted 10 April 2024 - 11:01 AM

TL;DR – I bought Leslie Peltier's 12” Alvan Clark lens. But for those of you who enjoy the details of a story and how this came to be, which brings in some history of the lens and the legacy of Leslie Peltier, please read below:

 

“Old telescopes never die, they are just laid away.”

 

This journey all started with this simple phrase, written by the venerable Leslie Peltier in his autobiography of sorts, Starlight Nights in 1965. After I finished reading this inspirational book a few years ago, this question kept repeating itself over and over in my mind. I went back and reread my favorite chapters several times. I clearly remember the moment I thought, “I wonder what happened to his telescopes?”. A question that I've come to learn is one of the most common questions someone has after finishing his book. The way that Leslie talked about his telescopes, cared for them, and USED them, gave the impression that they were very much his prized possessions and he gave their stewardship a high priority.

 

I first looked online, and many paths led to CloudyNights forum posts. I also consulted the archive of the Antique Telescope Society. Some fairly knowledgeable people there mentioned first hand that the Peltier family had retained the main 3 telescopes that Leslie mentions in his iconic book (the Strawberry Spyglass, 6” Fitz Comet Seeker and 12” Alvan Clark). But the information wasn't concrete, and I found some contradictory info, and a lot of it was 3rd hand or outdated by 20 years or more. Many mentions online that the 12” Clark had fallen into a state of severe disrepair and had to be torn down but that the lens was kept safe. Even a rumor it was returned to Miami University. I had to know more!

 

After reading the book you find out that Leslie had 2 sons. I found both of them online and found mailing address for both. I drafted a letter mentioning who I was and just wanted to find some information about the telescopes, where they were, who had them, were they on display or being used, were they family heirlooms being passed down in the family, etc? After warnings from others that I wouldn't be answered, I was very surprised to get responses from BOTH sons. The younger son mentioned by email he had the Strawberry Spyglass and the 6” Comet Seeker and they were both in safe keeping and planned to stay in the family for the long term, which I was happy to hear.

 

I then got a phone call from the eldest son, who confirmed that he did have the 12” Clark telescope. He said that indeed the dome had frozen open shortly after his father's passing and the lens was removed for safekeeping, and that weather had gotten the best of the observatory and the Clark telescope and mount. He took it down in 1994 and took the remnants back to his property in another nearby town in Ohio. He also confirmed that the lens was in good condition and had been kept safe, protected and unused since the time of his father's passing in 1980. We spoke at length a few times on the phone, he told me about his life, and his memories of his father and viewing through the telescopes. I then asked what the plans were for the 12” Clark. He said that he had planned to restore the old telescope, and build a new observatory around it, but time had slipped away, and now he didn't feel up to take on such a large project and now the tube and mount were probably beyond reasonable restoration means. He said for the right price and to the right person, he would consider selling the lens. I was a little nervous at this point, because what started as primarily a research project and information hunt, had turned into a possible transaction of one of the most iconic and historic telescopes of all time! What price would he ask for it? Where would I mount it? Would I dare try to restore the whole scope or attempt to build a new scope around the existing lens? (Brief history: This 12” Alvan Clark telescope was originally built in 1868 for Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT. Then sold in 1922 to Miami University in Oxford, OH. Remounted into a new tube and mount by the Lohmann Brothers in 1929, then gifted to Leslie Peltier, observatory building and all, in 1959.)

 

I had a long time to think about these things as we exchanged messages, photos and phone calls over the course of about a year. When it came to the price, he asked me to do my own research and approach him with a price, but also to keep the sale private for now as I had to consult some 3rd parties. I called several experts in that area, most of which were fellow Antique Telescope Society members to get a good idea on price and I picked a number about in the middle of the range that was recommended by this group of experts. It took me about 3 months to collect all this information and contact all the appropriate people. I tried several times to contact him after this with no luck, eventually one day his wife answered the phone and told me the sad news that he had passed away in an accident. I was in shock as I very much enjoyed our conversations, getting to hear such amazing first-hand stories of history about Leslie Peltier and his family that never had been written onto the internet or elsewhere. I was also looking forward to meeting him as by then we'd arranged to visit him this April for the total solar eclipse. So, sadly, I never got the chance to meet him in person or have any more conversations with him. I did however find that his wife was very kind and sincere and also open to carrying out the sale of the lens and to answer some questions I had about history of the family. We came to an agreement on price and made plans to meet the day before the eclipse. She shared photos with me before we came and sure enough, it looked the same as other similar sized Alvan Clark lenses I'd seen online and it had the trademark chip in the back of the lens that Peltier mentioned in Starlight Nights in one passage:

 

“Dr. Anderson [of Miami University] also divulged that he had been responsible for the tiny chip in the edge of the objective. It had been done, he said, by getting one of the adjusting screws too tight while fitting the lenses in their cell. He told me how he had then written to the J. W. Fecker Company of Pittsburgh to find out the cost of replacing the chipped crown element with a new one. When Fecker quoted a price of five thousand dollars for just one of the two elements that together make the complete objective he decided to pursue the matter no further. Actually the chipped edge does not affect the image quality of the lens in the slightest degree.” (Note: the chip is actually on the rear surface of the flint element (r4), approx 1” x 3/8” and very shallow, so < 0.3% of the surface area of the lens.)

 

20240407_164110.jpg

 

My family and I all flew out to Ohio for a quick 5 day journey that would include some usual sightseeing stops as well as a the full Leslie Peltier historical tour. We first stopped in to meet Mrs. Peltier and her son (Leslie's grandson) at their house in western Ohio. She showed me the remnants of the 12” Clark telescope OTA and mount. It was a mixture of shock and awe, as (I believe) it is beyond reasonable restoration (approximately 45 years basically outside uncovered). The rolled steel tube had many section rusted all the way through and the mount and gears all had rough etched rust covering its entirety. Several brass and stainless parts were in better shape and will hopefully be reused in the future project. But the focuser assembly and finder were gone. The lens was indeed in beautiful shape and it was like opening a sealed tomb for the first time in a generation, I couldn't believe my eyes that I was looking at the same lens that Leslie Peltier viewed through for nearly 21 years and wrote so poetically about in his books. We concluded the deal and I packed the lens safely in it's wooden storage case and we proceeded with the rest of our Peltier tour.

 

20240407_115630 (1).jpg

 

Next stop was to be Leslie Peltier's hometown of Delphos, OH. We first stopped into the Canal Commission Museum, which has an excellent exhibit on Peltier featuring tons of photos, articles and a working replica of the Merry-go-round observatory and Strawberry Spyglass with replica grindstone post mount. Bob Ebbeskotte gave us a personal tour and we bought some eclipse and Peltier shirts and stickers for the occasion. Bob and the museum have done such a good job on the exhibit, it's definitely not to be missed!

 

20240408_113631.jpg

 

Next we went to Peltier's former home on Bredeick St. called “Brookhaven”. This home is featured prominently in Starlight Nights and even more so in his last novel; “The Place on Jennings Creek”. The house is currently being remodeled to become an AirBnB for large groups and events and we were lucky enough to be one the very first guests to be welcomed to stay in the home! We arrived a few hours before the eclipse started, met the new owners (who were very kind and will be excellent owners for the house), several of the other Delphos locals and even Leslie Peltier's nephew; Pete Peltier. We got a tour of the newly remodeled interior that is done just gorgeously; classic early 20th century design with a modern touch and many of Leslie and Dottie's original decor and furniture (including Dottie's adorable shoe and hat collection!). We saw the large concrete pillar that still remains as a type of landmark of where the observatory used to stand that held the 12" Clark. Then we took in the amazing total eclipse of 2024 from the front lawn of Brookhaven, in the shadow of the moon, in the shadow of an amazing house and legacy. To me, being such a Peltier fan, I couldn't imagine a more perfect setting and as close to perfection as I can imagine. Brookhaven is such a beautiful property as well, it is just as picturesque as Peltier describes in his books (minus the observatories of course). After the amazing eclipse, we were able to view all the other local Peltier attractions; a monument and historical information sign dedicated to Peltier at the town Library, the Peltier's resting place at the local cemetery, and just down the road from there, the original Peltier family farm where so many of the stories from Starlight Nights took place on Ridge Rd; the old farmhouse (no longer there), the farm where the Cow Pasture observatory was, the Auglaize River and the strawberry patch where he picked his famous 900 quarts of strawberries to buy his first telescope. After that we went back to Brookhaven; made food in the same kitchen, slept in the same bedrooms and drank the same well water that the Peltier's would have done for their time there. The current owners of Brookhaven have tons of memorabilia, photos and reading material about Leslie Peltier as well, so you can relax in the parlor, reading as much as you want about his history.

 

20240408_150318.jpg

20240408_153329.jpg

20240408_155852.jpg

 

After a good night's sleep from the busy eclipse day before, we woke up refreshed, sipped coffee on the front porch listening to all the birds coming to life; the Northern Cardinals signing all around us, the Grackles fighting in the front grass, the distant call of some Blue Jays, Wild Turkeys trotting by near the creek, the magnolia blooming, and all the numerous perennial flowers starting to announce their spring emergence after their winter slumber. We didn't want to have to leave, but we had a big day ahead of us.

 

Departing back south, with the full immersion in Peltier history, we stopped in at the Cincinnati Observatory, the oldest operating professional observatory in the US. They have several amazing telescopes; a 16” Alvan Clark (1904), an 11” Merz and Mahler (1845) and a 5 and 3/8” Alvan Clark (1860). This was some good inspiration for the 12” Peltier Clark that I've been carefully traveling with for a few days now safely packed away in our luggage.

 

20240409_131553.jpg

 

Just as Peltier carried the lens in the back of his car wrapped in a blanket in1959 from Miami University before the rest of the scope was finally moved, and before him Professor William Anderson also carried the lens “a-la-carte” from Middletown, CT to Oxford, OH in 1922, I am traveling with this same lens packed securely in my carry-on luggage on a flight bound for Idaho. A lens crafted 35 years before the first airplane flight by man, is getting its very first flight at 156 years old. What happens now? Now comes the fun part; getting Starlight back into this iconic lens. Nothing is decided for sure, but my plans are to make this into a semi-portable instrument that doesn't require a 20 foot dome, a permanent observatory, or a 2-ton mount with 8 foot concrete pillar to support it. In a conventional design, this 12” f/15.6 refractor lens would require a 15 foot tube, which would be many hundreds of pounds and require a substantially sized mount both in size and height. But in a folded optical design, the weight can be close to 100 pounds, a tube only 5 feet long, and mounted on a standard high-capacity mount that can be broken down into smaller parts and transported. This must be done with care and precision though as folding the optics can introduce more problems if not done correctly. Portability will allow more people to be able to view through this iconic scope once more, and learn about the history of Leslie Peltier, Alvan Clark, and our astronomical past. Maybe someday I can also recover the rest of this scope and make a bold attempt to bring it back to some semblance of its past, but I fear it will be a "Ship of Theseus" project where I'll have to replace so many parts that there won't be many of the original parts left at all. Is it still the same scope? Or is it a replica? Cue ancient philosophical debate.

 

I feel honored, blessed and excited to be the current custodian for this amazing piece of astronomical history. I would appreciate it greatly if anyone can share any history they have with this scope if they've ever viewed through it in the past, either at Leslie Peltier's in Delphos, or at Miami University before. Thank you to everyone who gave me advice and encouragement along the way. I apologize for the secrecy before this big announcement as I wanted to honor the wishes of the family of a private sale. I will leave you with this passage from Starlight Nights which epitomizes my thoughts and feelings about historical telescopes;

 

“Sometimes, however, for one reason or another, telescopes do become dormant or go into a state of suspended animation, and at such times, as they slowly gather the dust of the passing years, it seems that they must wonder just what has become of the hands which once so eagerly pointed them to the skies. In this same vein I too have often wondered about all those myriads who, with many an expression of utter amazement and delight, have watched the rings of Saturn, the craters of the moon or the incredible Orion Nebula through these same instruments of mine. Both of these telescopes, even before they came to me, had already served long careers before the public eye. One is a Princeton graduate, the other an alumnus of both Wesleyan and Miami Universities, and each has spent a lifetime in showing-off the skies. So, it would seem quite logical that, out of all these thousands who, at some time, have peered into these telescopes, there must have been at least a few who, in some ways, have had the course of their lives changed or affected by the impact of the wonders that they saw, even as I once brushed against some stars which left their lifetime mark on me.

 

These telescope of mine are not just bits of property. I like to think of them as gifts in trust and myself as their administrator; one who is grateful that is has fallen to his lot to open up their eyes and let them see the stars again. They now seem quite rejuvenated and, with youthful zest, they look ahead to long and useful lives. But I am not misled by their appearance. I know something of their past and, in spite of all their sprightly mien, I still regard them with that feeling of deep reverence that one accords a patriarch, for they have witnessed much of history. Especially is this true of the 12-inch for I am much more certain of its genealogy.”

 

For those who wish to know more about the history of this lens prior to Peltier, please watch this amazing presentation titled "Before it Came to Delphos", put together by Horace Smith and Roy Kilgard for the Antique Telescope Society: https://vimeo.com/660978123


Edited by jragsdale, 10 April 2024 - 11:08 AM.

  • Joe Bergeron, Steve_M_M, scottinash and 69 others like this

#2 JWBriggs

JWBriggs

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 82
  • Joined: 16 Feb 2009
  • Loc: Magdalena, New Mexico

Posted 10 April 2024 - 11:31 AM

Thank goodness that this famous objective is finally unlocked and has a good new future before it! 

 

CONGRATULATIONS, Jordan! 

 

--John W. Briggs.


  • clintwhitman, Bob Bunge, jragsdale and 1 other like this

#3 djgilley

djgilley

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 412
  • Joined: 12 Apr 2016
  • Loc: Orange City, Florida

Posted 10 April 2024 - 11:46 AM

What a journey, Jordan! I likewise offer hardy congratulations on acquiring such a historic lens! I look forward to gazing upon this piece of history myself, hopefully in a few months. You might have contacted him already, but in case you haven't Roger Ceragioli has fabricated a 12.25 inch folded refractor, he could likely give you some advice on the construction of an ota.

 

David


Edited by djgilley, 10 April 2024 - 01:18 PM.

  • jragsdale and jkmccarthy like this

#4 Mike G.

Mike G.

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,025
  • Joined: 17 Jun 2013
  • Loc: Oberlin, Ohio

Posted 10 April 2024 - 11:55 AM

Great post and heartfelt thanks for saving this important artifact of history.  And please keep us informed of the restoration efforts!


  • jragsdale likes this

#5 oldmanastro

oldmanastro

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,641
  • Joined: 17 Nov 2013
  • Loc: San Juan, Puerto Rico-US

Posted 10 April 2024 - 12:34 PM

I'm so glad to see this piece of history on it's way to someday becoming part of another 12" refractor with the heart of a Clark and the spirit of Leslie Peltier. At the same time it is sad to know that the telescope OTA and mount could not be saved. Great story!!


  • jragsdale likes this

#6 jgraham

jgraham

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 24,976
  • Joined: 02 Dec 2004
  • Loc: Miami Valley Astronomical Society

Posted 10 April 2024 - 01:45 PM

Well I'll be darned! I have heard many stories about the whereabouts of the telescopes, none of which now turn out to be very accurate. Good to hear on all accounts, particularly the news about the 12". Hopefully in the not too distant future it will once again be catching starlight!

Enjoy!
  • jragsdale likes this

#7 Steve_M_M

Steve_M_M

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,658
  • Joined: 09 Jun 2004
  • Loc: Granbury, TX

Posted 10 April 2024 - 02:23 PM

Great story and well written.  Thank you for sharing and I look forward to the next thread on the folded OTA.  Knowing you, you should have that done by the end of the month :)  


  • clintwhitman and jragsdale like this

#8 jragsdale

jragsdale

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,760
  • Joined: 07 Dec 2015
  • Loc: Idaho

Posted 10 April 2024 - 02:38 PM

Thank goodness that this famous objective is finally unlocked and has a good new future before it! 

 

CONGRATULATIONS, Jordan! 

 

--John W. Briggs.

Thank you for your advice during the negotiations. And I'm sure I'll be sending you photos on some of the parts still attached to the tube to "authenticate" them as either original Alvan Clark or probable Lohmann Brothers.

 

What a journey, Jordan! I likewise offer hardy congratulations on acquiring such a historic lens! I look forward to gazing upon this piece of history myself, hopefully in a few months. You might have contacted him already, but in case you haven't Roger Ceragioli has fabricated a 12.25 inch folded refractor, he could likely give you some advice on the construction of an ota.

 

David

You were one of the few who knew about these plans while they were in their early stages, I hope you will for sure be one of the first to be able to view through this once it's all done. I expect a longer process to design and build this one accurately. I don't plan to settle on "good enough" and want something that will show the view just as good as if it wasn't folded at all. Sourcing and testing high quality flats will be the first order of business, I'll need a 10" and 6" optical flat, and I want to try to find something made from Zerodur, Cervit or fused quartz, with a very smooth surface and high performance test report. Then I'll get them freshly recoated (if needed) with high end coatings. On the folded design I have some rough sketches drawn up with some raytracing, but I'll definitely contact Roger (and others) for many other opinions/tips.

 

I'm so glad to see this piece of history on it's way to someday becoming part of another 12" refractor with the heart of a Clark and the spirit of Leslie Peltier. At the same time it is sad to know that the telescope OTA and mount could not be saved. Great story!!

Thanks! Hopefully I can still save as much as I can, and the parts that I can't maybe can go on display at the Peltier exhibit. But still lots to do and figure out on that front.

 

Great story and well written.  Thank you for sharing and I look forward to the next thread on the folded OTA.  Knowing you, you should have that done by the end of the month smile.gif  

Ha! This one will definitely be worth taking time to do it right. Luckily the biggest obstacle is already overcome; what mount. I have a large Schaefer mount with a 12" Byers gear that is the right size and capacity for carrying a scope like this.


Edited by jragsdale, 10 April 2024 - 07:03 PM.

  • ianatcn, Bomber Bob and djgilley like this

#9 dave253

dave253

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1,521
  • Joined: 08 Oct 2010
  • Loc: Australia 28.24S 153.25E

Posted 10 April 2024 - 03:42 PM

Epic story and journey, Jordan! 
 

Congratulations from down under.


  • jragsdale likes this

#10 John Rogers

John Rogers

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,412
  • Joined: 08 Feb 2008

Posted 10 April 2024 - 04:06 PM

That is awesome research and a great rescue Jordan! Congratulations!
  • jragsdale likes this

#11 Josephus Miller

Josephus Miller

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 336
  • Joined: 16 Feb 2023
  • Loc: New Mexico, USA

Posted 10 April 2024 - 06:13 PM

Truly a wonderful story. Starlight Nights has been a big inspiration to me, so it’s lovely to see the legacy live on.
  • jragsdale likes this

#12 Weisswurst Josef

Weisswurst Josef

    Mariner 2

  • -----
  • Posts: 296
  • Joined: 22 Feb 2023
  • Loc: Bayern

Posted 10 April 2024 - 06:42 PM

OMG !!!

 

I`m missing the words.

 

Very well done!


  • jragsdale likes this

#13 ccwemyss

ccwemyss

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,118
  • Joined: 11 Aug 2016
  • Loc: Massachusetts

Posted 10 April 2024 - 07:19 PM

Sounds like quite the quest! Glad it's in capable hands that can get it back under the stars. It will be interesting to see how the folded design takes shape. Will it be a box, or tubing, or truss?

 

Chip W.


  • jragsdale likes this

#14 apfever

apfever

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 8,420
  • Joined: 13 May 2008

Posted 10 April 2024 - 07:25 PM

Oh good. Idaho isn't very far.


  • Sean Cunneen and jragsdale like this

#15 Bob Campbell

Bob Campbell

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • ****-
  • Posts: 5,775
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2004
  • Loc: Scottsdale, AZ

Posted 10 April 2024 - 07:51 PM

TL;DR – I bought Leslie Peltier's 12” Alvan Clark lens. But for those of you who enjoy the details of a story and how this came to be, which brings in some history of the lens and the legacy of Leslie Peltier, please read below:

 

“Old telescopes never die, they are just laid away.”

 

This journey all started with this simple phrase, written by the venerable Leslie Peltier in his autobiography of sorts, Starlight Nights in 1965. After I finished reading this inspirational book a few years ago, this question kept repeating itself over and over in my mind. I went back and reread my favorite chapters several times. I clearly remember the moment I thought, “I wonder what happened to his telescopes?”. A question that I've come to learn is one of the most common questions someone has after finishing his book. The way that Leslie talked about his telescopes, cared for them, and USED them, gave the impression that they were very much his prized possessions and he gave their stewardship a high priority.

 

I first looked online, and many paths led to CloudyNights forum posts. I also consulted the archive of the Antique Telescope Society. Some fairly knowledgeable people there mentioned first hand that the Peltier family had retained the main 3 telescopes that Leslie mentions in his iconic book (the Strawberry Spyglass, 6” Fitz Comet Seeker and 12” Alvan Clark). But the information wasn't concrete, and I found some contradictory info, and a lot of it was 3rd hand or outdated by 20 years or more. Many mentions online that the 12” Clark had fallen into a state of severe disrepair and had to be torn down but that the lens was kept safe. Even a rumor it was returned to Miami University. I had to know more!

 

After reading the book you find out that Leslie had 2 sons. I found both of them online and found mailing address for both. I drafted a letter mentioning who I was and just wanted to find some information about the telescopes, where they were, who had them, were they on display or being used, were they family heirlooms being passed down in the family, etc? After warnings from others that I wouldn't be answered, I was very surprised to get responses from BOTH sons. The younger son mentioned by email he had the Strawberry Spyglass and the 6” Comet Seeker and they were both in safe keeping and planned to stay in the family for the long term, which I was happy to hear.

 

I then got a phone call from the eldest son, who confirmed that he did have the 12” Clark telescope. He said that indeed the dome had frozen open shortly after his father's passing and the lens was removed for safekeeping, and that weather had gotten the best of the observatory and the Clark telescope and mount. He took it down in 1994 and took the remnants back to his property in another nearby town in Ohio. He also confirmed that the lens was in good condition and had been kept safe, protected and unused since the time of his father's passing in 1980. We spoke at length a few times on the phone, he told me about his life, and his memories of his father and viewing through the telescopes. I then asked what the plans were for the 12” Clark. He said that he had planned to restore the old telescope, and build a new observatory around it, but time had slipped away, and now he didn't feel up to take on such a large project and now the tube and mount were probably beyond reasonable restoration means. He said for the right price and to the right person, he would consider selling the lens. I was a little nervous at this point, because what started as primarily a research project and information hunt, had turned into a possible transaction of one of the most iconic and historic telescopes of all time! What price would he ask for it? Where would I mount it? Would I dare try to restore the whole scope or attempt to build a new scope around the existing lens? (Brief history: This 12” Alvan Clark telescope was originally built in 1868 for Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT. Then sold in 1922 to Miami University in Oxford, OH. Remounted into a new tube and mount by the Lohmann Brothers in 1929, then gifted to Leslie Peltier, observatory building and all, in 1959.)

 

I had a long time to think about these things as we exchanged messages, photos and phone calls over the course of about a year. When it came to the price, he asked me to do my own research and approach him with a price, but also to keep the sale private for now as I had to consult some 3rd parties. I called several experts in that area, most of which were fellow Antique Telescope Society members to get a good idea on price and I picked a number about in the middle of the range that was recommended by this group of experts. It took me about 3 months to collect all this information and contact all the appropriate people. I tried several times to contact him after this with no luck, eventually one day his wife answered the phone and told me the sad news that he had passed away in an accident. I was in shock as I very much enjoyed our conversations, getting to hear such amazing first-hand stories of history about Leslie Peltier and his family that never had been written onto the internet or elsewhere. I was also looking forward to meeting him as by then we'd arranged to visit him this April for the total solar eclipse. So, sadly, I never got the chance to meet him in person or have any more conversations with him. I did however find that his wife was very kind and sincere and also open to carrying out the sale of the lens and to answer some questions I had about history of the family. We came to an agreement on price and made plans to meet the day before the eclipse. She shared photos with me before we came and sure enough, it looked the same as other similar sized Alvan Clark lenses I'd seen online and it had the trademark chip in the back of the lens that Peltier mentioned in Starlight Nights in one passage:

 

“Dr. Anderson [of Miami University] also divulged that he had been responsible for the tiny chip in the edge of the objective. It had been done, he said, by getting one of the adjusting screws too tight while fitting the lenses in their cell. He told me how he had then written to the J. W. Fecker Company of Pittsburgh to find out the cost of replacing the chipped crown element with a new one. When Fecker quoted a price of five thousand dollars for just one of the two elements that together make the complete objective he decided to pursue the matter no further. Actually the chipped edge does not affect the image quality of the lens in the slightest degree.” (Note: the chip is actually on the rear surface of the flint element (r4), approx 1” x 3/8” and very shallow, so < 0.3% of the surface area of the lens.)

 

attachicon.gif 20240407_164110.jpg

 

My family and I all flew out to Ohio for a quick 5 day journey that would include some usual sightseeing stops as well as a the full Leslie Peltier historical tour. We first stopped in to meet Mrs. Peltier and her son (Leslie's grandson) at their house in western Ohio. She showed me the remnants of the 12” Clark telescope OTA and mount. It was a mixture of shock and awe, as (I believe) it is beyond reasonable restoration (approximately 45 years basically outside uncovered). The rolled steel tube had many section rusted all the way through and the mount and gears all had rough etched rust covering its entirety. Several brass and stainless parts were in better shape and will hopefully be reused in the future project. But the focuser assembly and finder were gone. The lens was indeed in beautiful shape and it was like opening a sealed tomb for the first time in a generation, I couldn't believe my eyes that I was looking at the same lens that Leslie Peltier viewed through for nearly 21 years and wrote so poetically about in his books. We concluded the deal and I packed the lens safely in it's wooden storage case and we proceeded with the rest of our Peltier tour.

 

attachicon.gif 20240407_115630 (1).jpg

 

Next stop was to be Leslie Peltier's hometown of Delphos, OH. We first stopped into the Canal Commission Museum, which has an excellent exhibit on Peltier featuring tons of photos, articles and a working replica of the Merry-go-round observatory and Strawberry Spyglass with replica grindstone post mount. Bob Ebbeskotte gave us a personal tour and we bought some eclipse and Peltier shirts and stickers for the occasion. Bob and the museum have done such a good job on the exhibit, it's definitely not to be missed!

 

attachicon.gif 20240408_113631.jpg

 

Next we went to Peltier's former home on Bredeick St. called “Brookhaven”. This home is featured prominently in Starlight Nights and even more so in his last novel; “The Place on Jennings Creek”. The house is currently being remodeled to become an AirBnB for large groups and events and we were lucky enough to be one the very first guests to be welcomed to stay in the home! We arrived a few hours before the eclipse started, met the new owners (who were very kind and will be excellent owners for the house), several of the other Delphos locals and even Leslie Peltier's nephew; Pete Peltier. We got a tour of the newly remodeled interior that is done just gorgeously; classic early 20th century design with a modern touch and many of Leslie and Dottie's original decor and furniture (including Dottie's adorable shoe and hat collection!). We saw the large concrete pillar that still remains as a type of landmark of where the observatory used to stand that held the 12" Clark. Then we took in the amazing total eclipse of 2024 from the front lawn of Brookhaven, in the shadow of the moon, in the shadow of an amazing house and legacy. To me, being such a Peltier fan, I couldn't imagine a more perfect setting and as close to perfection as I can imagine. Brookhaven is such a beautiful property as well, it is just as picturesque as Peltier describes in his books (minus the observatories of course). After the amazing eclipse, we were able to view all the other local Peltier attractions; a monument and historical information sign dedicated to Peltier at the town Library, the Peltier's resting place at the local cemetery, and just down the road from there, the original Peltier family farm where so many of the stories from Starlight Nights took place on Ridge Rd; the old farmhouse (no longer there), the farm where the Cow Pasture observatory was, the Auglaize River and the strawberry patch where he picked his famous 900 quarts of strawberries to buy his first telescope. After that we went back to Brookhaven; made food in the same kitchen, slept in the same bedrooms and drank the same well water that the Peltier's would have done for their time there. The current owners of Brookhaven have tons of memorabilia, photos and reading material about Leslie Peltier as well, so you can relax in the parlor, reading as much as you want about his history.

 

attachicon.gif 20240408_150318.jpg

attachicon.gif 20240408_153329.jpg

attachicon.gif 20240408_155852.jpg

 

After a good night's sleep from the busy eclipse day before, we woke up refreshed, sipped coffee on the front porch listening to all the birds coming to life; the Northern Cardinals signing all around us, the Grackles fighting in the front grass, the distant call of some Blue Jays, Wild Turkeys trotting by near the creek, the magnolia blooming, and all the numerous perennial flowers starting to announce their spring emergence after their winter slumber. We didn't want to have to leave, but we had a big day ahead of us.

 

Departing back south, with the full immersion in Peltier history, we stopped in at the Cincinnati Observatory, the oldest operating professional observatory in the US. They have several amazing telescopes; a 16” Alvan Clark (1904), an 11” Merz and Mahler (1845) and a 5 and 3/8” Alvan Clark (1860). This was some good inspiration for the 12” Peltier Clark that I've been carefully traveling with for a few days now safely packed away in our luggage.

 

attachicon.gif 20240409_131553.jpg

 

Just as Peltier carried the lens in the back of his car wrapped in a blanket in1959 from Miami University before the rest of the scope was finally moved, and before him Professor William Anderson also carried the lens “a-la-carte” from Middletown, CT to Oxford, OH in 1922, I am traveling with this same lens packed securely in my carry-on luggage on a flight bound for Idaho. A lens crafted 35 years before the first airplane flight by man, is getting its very first flight at 156 years old. What happens now? Now comes the fun part; getting Starlight back into this iconic lens. Nothing is decided for sure, but my plans are to make this into a semi-portable instrument that doesn't require a 20 foot dome, a permanent observatory, or a 2-ton mount with 8 foot concrete pillar to support it. In a conventional design, this 12” f/15.6 refractor lens would require a 15 foot tube, which would be many hundreds of pounds and require a substantially sized mount both in size and height. But in a folded optical design, the weight can be close to 100 pounds, a tube only 5 feet long, and mounted on a standard high-capacity mount that can be broken down into smaller parts and transported. This must be done with care and precision though as folding the optics can introduce more problems if not done correctly. Portability will allow more people to be able to view through this iconic scope once more, and learn about the history of Leslie Peltier, Alvan Clark, and our astronomical past. Maybe someday I can also recover the rest of this scope and make a bold attempt to bring it back to some semblance of its past, but I fear it will be a "Ship of Theseus" project where I'll have to replace so many parts that there won't be many of the original parts left at all. Is it still the same scope? Or is it a replica? Cue ancient philosophical debate.

 

I feel honored, blessed and excited to be the current custodian for this amazing piece of astronomical history. I would appreciate it greatly if anyone can share any history they have with this scope if they've ever viewed through it in the past, either at Leslie Peltier's in Delphos, or at Miami University before. Thank you to everyone who gave me advice and encouragement along the way. I apologize for the secrecy before this big announcement as I wanted to honor the wishes of the family of a private sale. I will leave you with this passage from Starlight Nights which epitomizes my thoughts and feelings about historical telescopes;

 

“Sometimes, however, for one reason or another, telescopes do become dormant or go into a state of suspended animation, and at such times, as they slowly gather the dust of the passing years, it seems that they must wonder just what has become of the hands which once so eagerly pointed them to the skies. In this same vein I too have often wondered about all those myriads who, with many an expression of utter amazement and delight, have watched the rings of Saturn, the craters of the moon or the incredible Orion Nebula through these same instruments of mine. Both of these telescopes, even before they came to me, had already served long careers before the public eye. One is a Princeton graduate, the other an alumnus of both Wesleyan and Miami Universities, and each has spent a lifetime in showing-off the skies. So, it would seem quite logical that, out of all these thousands who, at some time, have peered into these telescopes, there must have been at least a few who, in some ways, have had the course of their lives changed or affected by the impact of the wonders that they saw, even as I once brushed against some stars which left their lifetime mark on me.

 

These telescope of mine are not just bits of property. I like to think of them as gifts in trust and myself as their administrator; one who is grateful that is has fallen to his lot to open up their eyes and let them see the stars again. They now seem quite rejuvenated and, with youthful zest, they look ahead to long and useful lives. But I am not misled by their appearance. I know something of their past and, in spite of all their sprightly mien, I still regard them with that feeling of deep reverence that one accords a patriarch, for they have witnessed much of history. Especially is this true of the 12-inch for I am much more certain of its genealogy.”

 

For those who wish to know more about the history of this lens prior to Peltier, please watch this amazing presentation titled "Before it Came to Delphos", put together by Horace Smith and Roy Kilgard for the Antique Telescope Society: https://vimeo.com/660978123

Really amazing adventure and story!

 

Maybe this warrants a CN article rather than a topic post.

 

I'm sure the others have seen this compilation of yours, but just in case:

 

https://youtu.be/JBa...AGn8VwYegajqSQo

 

Thanks for sharing with us

 

Bob


  • jragsdale likes this

#16 Bungee

Bungee

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 529
  • Joined: 09 Sep 2018
  • Loc: South Central Missouri

Posted 10 April 2024 - 07:53 PM

I feel silly now for suggesting you were going to rescue a mere 6345.

 

Hats off to you and all your kind who have the desire and means to preserve history. 


  • jragsdale likes this

#17 Peter Ceravolo

Peter Ceravolo

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 536
  • Joined: 15 Apr 2014

Posted 10 April 2024 - 08:13 PM

Excellent Jordan!

Glad you're going to give the lens a third life. But it's such a shame what happened to the telescope....

Peter


  • jragsdale likes this

#18 starman876

starman876

    Nihon Seiko

  • *****
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 26,119
  • Joined: 28 Apr 2008
  • Loc: VA

Posted 10 April 2024 - 08:56 PM

what a wonderful post.   Wish you all the luck in the world using the clark lens into an operational scope. Sounds like a project that dreams are made of.  Congratulations.


  • jragsdale likes this

#19 Sean Cunneen

Sean Cunneen

    Let Me Think

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 4,776
  • Joined: 01 Aug 2007
  • Loc: Flossmoor Il.

Posted 10 April 2024 - 09:09 PM

This is absolutely fantastic, fine work! Sometimes you are meant to be at a certain place, at a certain time and it sure feels like that lens knew who it should go to!

Before you do anything else extreme, you should test the objective and make sure it hasn't been corrupted, that the elements are in their correct orientation and that the performance is worth the second half of putting it in a working scope! We all hope you can restore the glass to it's proper astronomical uses, but sometimes these optics already did their work and just have stories left(and there is no shame in that!)


  • dave253, rcwolpert, Bomber Bob and 1 other like this

#20 delphosfan

delphosfan

    Sputnik

  • -----
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 06 Jul 2019

Posted 10 April 2024 - 09:19 PM

It was a pleasure to meet Jordan and his daughters and talk a little Peltier.  Really good people.  Thrilled he's saving the lense from who knows what fate.    


  • Steve_M_M, dave253, jragsdale and 2 others like this

#21 jragsdale

jragsdale

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,760
  • Joined: 07 Dec 2015
  • Loc: Idaho

Posted 10 April 2024 - 10:44 PM

Before you do anything else extreme, you should test the objective and make sure it hasn't been corrupted, that the elements are in their correct orientation and that the performance is worth the second half of putting it in a working scope! We all hope you can restore the glass to it's proper astronomical uses, but sometimes these optics already did their work and just have stories left(and there is no shame in that!)

Good advice! I'm quite convinced that the work has already been done for me. Leslie Peltier famously wrote this passage in Starlight Nights discussing this very thing. A flipped crown element is possible, even in a large high-end refractor owned by a professional observatory or university, as Leslie writes below:

 

"One clear autumn night our curiosity got the better of us and we decided to have a look through the telescope even though, mounted on the ground as it was, we could point to nothing higher than about 30 degrees above the horizon without the eye end striking the ground. Stanley and I carried out the objective and eyepiece holder from their place of storage in the house and fitted them into the tube. That first night's trial was a bitter disappointment. Every bright star was surrounded by a purple halo!

Stanley thought he recalled seeing these halos when he had used the instrument at Miami. Nevertheless, I was sure that something was wrong for this was a Clark objective. It had been ground by the makers of the world's largest objectives. The 40-inch Yerkes, the 36-inch Lick, and the Washington 26-inch, which first had seen the Martian moons, had all been ground by the Clarks. Furthermore, I once had looked through the 40-inch at Yerkes and there certainly were no such halos around the stars at Williams Bay. I felt like one who had acquired a Stradivarius, and found it made of cottonwood!

We took the objective back to the house and there, in the dining room on our softest rug, in fear and trembling, I removed the lenses from their cell. Sometimes a cloudy film of fungus growth attacks the inner surfaces of the old lenses but these, when critically examined, were clear and sparkling.

In my 6-inch telescope the two elements, which together make up its objective, are in actual contact with each other, but in the 12-inch they were very slightly separated by a narrow paper spacer that Dr. Anderson, of Miami, had told me, with a twinkle in his eye, was just the thickness of a one-cent stamp. It was this paper spacer that sent me to thinking. It was quite invisible when the lens was in its cell, so the fact that its presence and even its extreme thinness were known, proved that at some time in the past someone had taken this lens apart. Could it, in some way, have been reassembled incorrectly? To the eye the two surfaces of the double-convex front element seemed exactly alike, but just supposing there actually was a difference, too slight for me to detect, in the curves of these two surfaces. This could make a difference in image quality. Carefully I turned the lens over and reassembled it in the cell. This time, however, that face which had so long looked out upon the stars, now snuggled almost cheek to cheek against its concave mate. 

Once again we carried the objective out to the telescope and secured it in the tube. The bright star Rigel now was low in the southeastern sky. I carefully centered it in the finder. I shifted my eye to the telescope and, with fingers that were cold and shaking, I turned the focusing screw slowly inward until the star became a blue-white diamond and the tiny gem beside it stood out sharp and clear.

I feel that the three long-departed Clarks must have rested a little more quietly after that night-for the halos had disappeared."

 

And as Leslie's son conveyed to me, Leslie was viewing on every clear night up until the day he suddenly passed. And the lens was simply removed from the scope and kept in storage ever since. It hasn't seen starlight since the night prior to Leslie's passing. So I'm quite confident that the orientation is correct. If not, it's a simple process to reverse and the symptom would be obvious on first light.

 

And as for the overall quality of the lens, as Leslie also articulated above, the Clarks were famous for their high quality optics, of course there were variations, and even some duds, so it's a fair question. But there is one other important piece of information that even Leslie wasn't aware of (that I know of); in an 1887 edition of The Sidereal Messenger, the editor wrote an article honoring Alvan Clark Sr. after his passing titled "The Life and Achievements of Alvan Clark". Within this article, is this paragraph, mentioning this lens that was formerly at Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT:

 

"After making the smaller telescopes, the Clarks began to make 12 inch object glasses, and some of these of their manufacture are probably the most perfect of any in the world. Mr. Clark has often said to me that the 12-inch objective at Middletown, Conn., and the 12-inch at the Lick Observatory (formerly the property of my friend Henry Draper), were the best that he had ever seen."

 

So as for the overall optical quality of the lens, I'm quite confident it is of the highest order.

 

Also, I've scoured our own forums and there's this post from BrooksObs on 12-25-2014 with first hand views through the 12-inch:

"Leslie and I were friends for quite a number of years prior to his death and in addition to correspondence I had the opportunity to visit with him at his home on several occasions. I even managed to do some actual but unsuccessful comet hunting in his famous Merry-Go-Round Observatory! Also while visiting Leslie I had the chance to use his magnificent 12-inch refractor for some observations of faint variable stars together with a few quick looks at the planets. I can honestly say from those sessions that the big old refractor is the finest telescope I've ever looked through, which includes a number of very large professional refractors in institutions. With Leslie's 12-inch I saw detail on Jupiter that I did not see again until I examined images obtained of the planet by spacecraft years later."


Edited by jragsdale, 10 April 2024 - 10:55 PM.

  • astro140, rcwolpert, Bomber Bob and 7 others like this

#22 Exnihilo

Exnihilo

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,048
  • Joined: 02 Aug 2010
  • Loc: Phoenix, AZ

Posted 10 April 2024 - 11:01 PM

What a great story and unforgettable experience, thanks for sharing!    My memories of the small bits of time I spent with Clyde Tombaugh are forever precious in my mind, and of using one of the telescopes he used to maintain.  Wow, 12" Clark lens, congrats!


  • jragsdale likes this

#23 jragsdale

jragsdale

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,760
  • Joined: 07 Dec 2015
  • Loc: Idaho

Posted 10 April 2024 - 11:06 PM

It was a pleasure to meet Jordan and his daughters and talk a little Peltier.  Really good people.  Thrilled he's saving the lense from who knows what fate.    

A pleasure to finally meet you as well! And thank you again for all the work you've done for the museum and elsewhere to help spread the legacy of Leslie Peltier. I hope we can work together on more projects in the future!


  • delphosfan likes this

#24 jragsdale

jragsdale

    Soyuz

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,760
  • Joined: 07 Dec 2015
  • Loc: Idaho

Posted 11 April 2024 - 12:22 AM

There was actually a lot more to the story when it came to carrying the lens through the airport. I had it all planned out; I had the lens wrapped in a soft cloth, then it was inside a custom solid wooden box as a protective shell that the lens was already in when I got it. The lens itself is only 18.7lbs, quite light for a 12" objective in its brass cell. Including the box it was a sturdy 30lbs, 14" wide x 16" tall x 4" deep. I purchased a specific rolling carry-on bag that would house the box with a perfect fit for just enough room around it for another layer of a soft towel for additional cushioning. Everything was going according to plan but when I got up to the check-in counter, they said that our type of ticket didn't allow for any "carry-ons", only a "personal item" like a purse or backpack, even though my rolling carry-on bag was small enough to technically fit in the seat in front of me, apparently it was still too large for my low-class ticket. I said I would pay an extra baggage fee to allow this carry-on and I'd store it in the overhead compartment if needed (with the lens removed and under the seat in front of me). They said, no, absolutely not, you MUST check the bag, there's no room in the overhead compartments because the flight is full of higher class passengers. The only other option was to contact customer service on the phone and change my ticket entirely. We got to the airport early in case there were any snags related to the lens, so we had time. I called customer service and changed my ticket to the next class up. It took 45 minutes on hold, but we got it done and it was an extra $50. I went back up to the counter, triumphant, that I now wasn't the LOWEST class customer that I was before. They accepted my new confirmation number, and then proceeded to tell me that my new "upgraded" ticket was the same class as before, and the same problem; absolutely no carry-ons! They were rude and stern and obviously weren't sensitive to my plight, even with 2 young children in tow. There was no way I was going to check the bag with the lens, so I thought of the only thing I could; I removed the lens from its wooden case, wrapped both layers of soft towels and an extra sweater I had on me around the lens, and placed it loose in the large compartment of my backpack that I had on. I checked the rolling carry-on bag (at a cost) with the now empty wooden box to be picked up at my destination. Now, with a backpack and a large 19lb lens only protected by a few layers of cloth, we carefully set out to the next hurtle: TSA security. We waited in the long line, and finally got up to our turn, I had to gently place the backpack with the lens lying flat in the plastic tray to be sent down the conveyor to be x-rayed. I mentioned to everyone that could possibly grab my bag that I have fragiles in the bag. No one seemed to care. At this point I'm separated from my backpack with the lens by a large barrier of plastic so they can grab, move, toss or do whatever they want to my backpack and its fragile contents at their whim and I couldn't stop them. This is peak anxiety for me. As expected, the lens triggered every security alarm possible, and they moved the backpack, tray and all, to a separate conveyor to be hand searched. The TSA agent searching the bag asks if there's anything sharp or fragile so I plead, "Yes! Very fragile! The most fragile! A priceless antique telescope lens, please be so careful." Because at this point, I'm not allowed to touch or interfere, I can only watch as this person opens my backpack and removes the lens and starts unwrapping the layers of cloth I so carefully wrapped it with just minutes before. My heart sank as he tried to pick it up by the center of the glass when I yelled out, "Stop! Only handle it from the edges please!" and fortunately for me, he was kind and compliant and was very gentle with it. He finished his search and handed it back and said with a chuckle, "I hope you had a good view of the eclipse with this." After security, we had pretty much cleared all the hurdles that airlines and airports tend to do to travelers. The only thing left was to carry the lens in my backpack for the miles and miles of airport concourses, walking escalators, trains to other terminals, 2 separate flights, 3 separate airports. I kept the backpack reversed with it in front of me, so no one could accidently bump into me from behind with something heavy (like the corner of a suitcase) and kept my hands under the edge of the lens at the bottom, where I could feel the lens pressing down. I didn't want to test the seams of my backpack to see if they could handle the weight, so I tried to support it as much as I could. My kids were constantly joking that I was taking care of my baby as it looked like I was holding a precious newborn with my hands underneath it in front of me. On the first flight, right as we sat down, the flight attendant sees my bag and asks if I want to put it in the overhead compartment, because there's plenty of room if I do! (Arrrrrgggg!) I politely declined. It took us 14 hours of travel total to get from sipping coffee on the front porch at Brookhaven, to kicking off our shoes back home in Boise, ID, lens safe and secure. Next time, if I ever travel with this lens again (perhaps to get it professionally tested and analyzed for reference), I will definitely make sure to purchase the correct class of ticket that allows a carry-on bag!


  • Joe Bergeron, Bob Campbell, m0bius and 14 others like this

#25 39cross

39cross

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 506
  • Joined: 24 Jul 2017
  • Loc: Beverly, MA

Posted 11 April 2024 - 06:42 AM

Holy cow, what a stressful ordeal that was.  So glad the TSA agent was a good one and the critical moment passed successfully!  But a real heart-stopper of a story.  We armchair appreciators of all that is beautiful and precious salute you!


  • jragsdale and B 26354 like this


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics