3.10.25 0428 CDST: Negative

T Corona Borealis
#201
Posted 10 March 2025 - 08:35 AM
#202
Posted 10 March 2025 - 05:10 PM
- bphaneuf likes this
#203
Posted 11 March 2025 - 08:05 AM
Didn't blow this morning either.
Murphy's Law of Astro says it'll blow when it's 100% overcast here, so maybe I'll just quit checking.
#204
Posted 24 March 2025 - 02:05 PM
- PlanetNamek likes this
#205
Posted 24 March 2025 - 10:56 PM
If nothing else, this thread is providing a means for CNers to increase their post count!
- charles.tremblay.darveau likes this
#206
Posted 25 March 2025 - 09:08 AM
If nothing else, this thread is providing a means for CNers to increase their post count!
I have to decide if I should celebrate hitting 5,000 or not.
Edited by jcj380, 25 March 2025 - 09:09 AM.
- ABQJeff likes this
#207
Posted 25 March 2025 - 10:16 AM
It's a dud!
- andylsun likes this
#208
Posted 27 March 2025 - 02:21 PM
Interesting article from Space.Com LINK
Hmmmm, if the one is correct then either today 3/27/25, if not then on 11/10/25 and if not then on 6/25/26. We'll see. This paper is an interesting read from the article. I do agree with this quote from the article:
"Most astronomers are skeptical about this prediction, as am I," he told Space.com. "The best thing to do is to keep watching every clear night."
Edited by JayinUT, 27 March 2025 - 02:25 PM.
- bphaneuf likes this
#209
Posted 27 March 2025 - 06:04 PM
Surely it has the potential to become the astronomical prediction of the century. But more likely, just ending being another attempt to get attention ...
For instance, did just hold on it with my 8x42, I can state March 27 already fell flat.
regards
Edited by CHnuschti, 27 March 2025 - 06:05 PM.
- jcj380 likes this
#210
Posted 27 March 2025 - 10:31 PM
Is it going to blow before or after Halley's Comet returns? Put your bets in now!
- Erik30, Steve Cox and Epick Crom like this
#211
Posted 27 March 2025 - 10:39 PM
Can I have an over/under?Is it going to blow before or after Halley's Comet returns? Put your bets in now!
![]()
- PlanetNamek likes this
#212
Posted 28 March 2025 - 12:13 AM
Funny how multiple news outlets and "science" outlets have stories about tonight's the night !!
- kgb, Steve Cox and Epick Crom like this
#213
Posted 28 March 2025 - 10:12 AM
Its as predictable as picking the correct numbers for the top prize of the Power Ball Lottery.
Cheers
Don
#214
Posted 28 March 2025 - 12:04 PM
Its as predictable as picking the correct numbers for the top prize of the Power Ball Lottery.
Cheers
Don
"The “Blaze Star” is what’s known as a recurrent nova. When a white dwarf in a binary system sucks enough hydrogen from its red giant companion, it triggers a thermonuclear explosion. That process works almost like clockwork and results in a bright flash that has been seen every 80 years or so by previous generations of astronomers in 1786, 1866 and 1946‚ and now, almost certainly in 2025-2026. There are records going back to 1217."
https://www.forbes.c...t-for-79-years/
In the grand scheme of things, particularly in astronomical terms, it seems a bit more predictable than correct picking numbers for a powerball lottery...
- gfamily likes this
#215
Posted 28 March 2025 - 12:23 PM
Why the heck is this dud in the news again?
Almost certainly 2024
now almost certainly 2025-2026
almost certainly in the next 5 years. Shirley
- saemark30 and Steve Cox like this
#216
Posted 29 March 2025 - 09:18 PM
Better to hype it and get a lot of viewers than play catch up?
#218
Posted 29 March 2025 - 09:39 PM
This whole thing is starting to feel like a "Waiting for Godot" play.
#219
Posted 30 March 2025 - 11:04 AM
Why the heck is this dud in the news again?
Almost certainly 2024
now almost certainly 2025-2026
almost certainly in the next 5 years. Shirley
I've been getting this on my phone Google news every day.
Its sure to pop today, tomorrow or next week.
I'm sure if news writers cry out everyday it will happen eventually.
#220
Posted 31 March 2025 - 01:24 PM
Almost a year since this Post started...still waiting...any day now, I just know it. Lol.
Cheers
Don
#221
Posted 31 March 2025 - 01:31 PM
Various professional astronomers, back in '24, were noting it may not be until 2026 until the event occurs so we're still well within the window of the prediction. It's evident a lot people can't or won't under that...
- moefuzz likes this
#222
Posted 31 March 2025 - 03:28 PM
Various professional astronomers, back in '24, were noting it may not be until 2026 until the event occurs so we're still well within the window of the prediction. It's evident a lot people can't or won't under that...
Cheers
Don
#223
Posted 31 March 2025 - 05:13 PM
As we wait on recurrent nova T CrB, dwarf nova U Geminorum is teeing up for its next 8-magnitude outburst.
https://skyandtelesc...low-meet-u-gem/
- Redbetter and Epick Crom like this
#224
Posted 31 March 2025 - 05:29 PM
It is more evident that some folks have not been paying to attention to the actual timeline of predictions, since "it's about to blow" predictions have been coming out since at least 2022. Schaefer has been the main cheerleader for this nova and his first prediction based on changes in the light curve in Dec. 2022 was for ~2023. Direct quote from his AAVSO article: "T CrB WILL ERUPT ~2023." His punctuation, bold and capitalization since it was the first line of a section.
Then in ~March 2023 he said, "2025.5±1.3". Then in June 2023 he prematurely called the dip and announced the eruption would be in "2024.4±0.3". Those predictions were all by the same author in the space of perhaps 7 months.
Actually, of the short papers/predictions I have seen on this, the one by Jean Schneider published in October 2024 is the simplest and most interesting to me. It noted that based on when the previous eruptions have occurred, there may be a correlation with specific point in the orbital period of the star. This included a table of dates corresponding to that period (I am omitting the one in Aug. 2024 that passed before it was published):
- 2025 Mar 27
- 2025 Nov 10
- 2026 Jun 25
Of course the first of these available to the public was the March date, which was misinterpreted (or misrepresented?) by some media as being THE time when it was expected to erupt, vs. one of a series of potential times, and that series is only more probable if a specific theory about the timing is accurate.
Whenever the eruption occurs, if it happens to fall on/very near one of those dates, or later dates "on the beat", then it will indicate something more fundamental about the way the system works or is physically configured.
And speaking of history, Sky & Telescope had a news blurb about this back in 2016, referencing an article from 2015 when T CrB had entered the active state. It noted that the eruption had previously occurred 8 years after T CrB entered its prior active state in 1938. That would have put the eruption in around 2023.
- CHnuschti and Dust10 like this
#225
Posted 31 March 2025 - 05:45 PM
Actually, of the short papers/predictions I have seen on this, the one by Jean Schneider published in October 2024 is the simplest and most interesting to me.
The paper to that newest nostradamic prediction of Schneider can be read here: https://iopscience.i...515-5172/ad8bba
with 2 passages saying:
"In this paper I investigate a way to predict eruption dates with a precision of a week or two."
"Table 1 gives the predicted days of eruption, within a few days."
regards
P.S. Having hold just now on it with my 8x42: still nothing going on. 3 stars on the left and 2 on the right of T CrB with around 8.0m can be detected if mounted on a tripod.
Edited by CHnuschti, 31 March 2025 - 06:06 PM.
- jcj380 likes this