Thanks! --- I just read both. I note that they are addressing with those displacement and force actuators five local aberrations at each and every little rectangular segment down there >>> Zernikeish tip, tilt, power, astigx, astigy >>> instantly solved through a sensor-coupled transfer matrix... so far good invention using garden-variety tools, which is of course good inventive "novel use of existing device". This allows the panels to be nice and cheap... quite possibly something no more sophisticated than metalized float or plate glass (also good!) What this achieves is better concentration at the tower target --- significant, but probably not overwhelmingly so. What they're doing is salvaging the rays that otherwise miss the target for various reasons: poor shape of the segs, poor aiming vis gimbals alone, etc. Obviously a real optics guy like Roger assures this is real applied science and not just mumbo jumbo. Is it a "breakthrough" No. Is it good applied science and engineering? Yes, of course.
[I used to review Solar Concentrator patents back in the 1970's and 80's for the patent lawyers. My specialty in that arena was "non image forming geometrical optics.]
PS: I called the panel-localized aberrations "Zernikeish" because orthogonality on the unit rectangle is different than the traditional unit circle Zernikes. Also, piston is not pertinent because phasing unnecessary in such flux concentrators.
I'm sure Roger is having a ball with this; he's a master nuts and bolts optiker --- and alternative energy sources has plenty of $$$ thrown at it. He brings established professional credibility and attention to the arena. Tom