interesting. I had a bunch of Meade SCT's all were soft and you had back luck with Celestron SCT's and all I had was good Celestron SCT's. Does that average out to 50% of both makes were bad.
I can't count the 3 bad 2045's as Mizar made them. It has been mixed bag. My all time worst SCT's were from Celestron and my all time best were from Celestron. Meade SCT's pre 1991 were never that great or that bad. Then i had a run of very good LX200's in the later 90's with 7 that were very good and one soft 12" LX200. Meade was on the ball in the late 90's with the SCT optics. All Celestron stuff from Vixen was all super good but Celestron did not make them. Not sure who made the Comet catcher as mine was coma and mush city. If you really think about it Meade or Celestron never really made much of what they sold. Vixen was always super good out of more than 30 i have had and the Meade Blue tube stuff in the mid 80's was also very good other than the under mounted 6 and 8" Newts. No matter what all brands and types of scopes vary. Once we get into the pricey stuff they vary less but once in a while a bad one can slip out.
Edited by CHASLX200, 26 November 2024 - 07:01 AM.