Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

One hour under 20.5-20.75, towards south.

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Mauro Da Lio

Mauro Da Lio

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 889
  • Joined: 12 Sep 2004

Posted 28 July 2024 - 05:07 PM

Ca Mello 27/7/24 (44.8908819,12.3968578)

 

SQM 20.5 to 20.75. AOD 0.15-0.20. Temperature 24-22°C. Humidity absent. Mosquitoes few and kept at bay with repellents.

Sumerian 10” Dobsonian. Night Vision PVS-14 with Photonis FOM 2000 tube.

 

NGC 6334, Cat's Paw Nebula. The five main footprints are seen with an H-alpha filter, Pentax 40 mm, Paracorr, and night vision. The object is 8° high, just above the horizon. Also seen is the dark nebula between the two northernmost footprints and the darker, sharper division of the northwest footprint. SQM 20.50: It is not yet astronomical darkness, and in the direction I am looking, there are the lights of the Marina restaurant.
The view is better than that with a 20" dobson from Tivoli Farm http://www.deepsky-d...34-2/dsdlang/fr

 

NGC 6357, Lobster Nebula. With an H-alpha filter, Pentax 40 mm, Paracorr, and night vision, you can see the bright central part next to Prismis 24, which is very bright (would be worth trying at higher magnifications) and, with difficulty, the two claws. The sky is shining in that direction, though. The view is better than that with a 20" dobson from Tivoli Farm, which shows only a flare for the brightest part: http://www.deepsky-d...s-24/dsdlang/fr

 

M 20. With Pentax 40 mm, Paracorr, and night vision, I can see the reflection part as well with the UHC-S filter. All in all, the nebula is very bright, and you can clearly see the dark nebulae. In contrast, with an H-alpha filter, the contrast increases, but overall, the most pleasing image is the one with the UHC-S filter. The dark nebulae are pretty similar to those with the 25" French telescope http://www.deepsky-d...-020/dsdlang/fr. However, the reflection part could be clearer.

 

M 8, Laguna.  With Pentax 40 mm, Paracorr, and night viewer. With the H-alpha filter, you can see much more nebula extension than the UHC-S filter. However, the image looks better with the UHC-S filter. With the latter, the visible part is similar to 25" in the drawing: http://www.deepsky-d...m-21/dsdlang/fr (with more shades of intensity).

 

IC 4685, emission nebula near Laguna. With UHC-S filter, Pentax 40 mm, Paracorr and night viewer, it is visible without detail. It could be better visible with H-alpha.

 

NGC 6544, globular just below the Lagoon. With the UHC-S filter, Pentax 40 mm, Paracorr, and night viewer, it is already resolved into stars. With Zoom to 24 mm and no filter, the globular is resolved well. Increasing the magnification further improves star resolution. The cluster has an interesting alignment of arched stars. https://theskylive.c.../ngc6544-object

 

SQM 20.73, 23°C.

 

NGC 6818, Little Gem. Planetary nebula: zoomed in at 12 mm (120x), NV, without filters, looks like a little ring and seems to guess a less bright central part. In this case, the view is inferior to 20-25", which has reached much higher magnifications. http://www.deepsky-d...6818/dsdlang/fr

 

NGC 7009, Saturn nebula. Planetary nebula, zoomed in at 12 and 16 mm (90-120x), NV, without filters, looks like a small Saturn because there is a slightly brighter central ball and ring-like rings, with the two less bright loops in between. In this case, the view is inferior to 20-25", which has reached much higher magnifications. http://www.deepsky-d...7009/dsdlang/fr


Edited by Mauro Da Lio, 28 July 2024 - 05:08 PM.

  • Uwe Pilz likes this

#2 a__l

a__l

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • -----
  • Posts: 5,096
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2007

Posted 01 August 2024 - 07:21 PM

NGC 6544 compared to 20"?



#3 WheezyGod

WheezyGod

    Apollo

  • -----
  • Posts: 1,404
  • Joined: 07 Jun 2021
  • Loc: Massachusetts, USA

Posted 02 August 2024 - 10:59 AM

Yup most of the small PN nebula will be better with a large scope, without NV because PN needs a lot of magnification. Lots of magnification lowers the f/ratio which lowers the impact of NV.


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics