The only thing that will get me dark skies,is a nuclear blast,lol
Who else thinks getting bombed back to the stone age is a good thing?
#1
Posted 29 July 2024 - 09:24 AM
- kgb, Stellar1 and RiderRoy like this
#2
Posted 29 July 2024 - 09:38 AM
Move to New Zealand. But then I would expect Wyoming to have plenty of dark skies with a population of only around half a million.
Edited by hyiger, 29 July 2024 - 09:43 AM.
- djeber2 and Wimpy.mcpoat like this
#3
Posted 29 July 2024 - 09:57 AM
Just wait for the grid to fail in a decade or so and we'll find out. Have your telescope ready... one that does not rely on AC power or GPS. Tom
- Wimpy.mcpoat likes this
#4
Posted 29 July 2024 - 10:24 AM
You're in Wyoming! Head just SE of Lander on a 'windless night', and be amazed. So many stars I couldn't find the constellations. (Good luck with the windy part.)
- Wimpy.mcpoat likes this
#5
Posted 29 July 2024 - 11:05 AM
I don't think it will take a nuke to put us back to the stone age. IMHO, the western "modern" world is already hanging on a fragile thread. Take away power, take away Walmart, and see how long it takes to fall to pieces. No, we are doomed by our own technology. After the fall the only ones left will be stone age peoples; aboriginal, tribal, people who have nothing by our standards. But they have what we don't; the knowledge to survive without the modern world. The ability to hunt, to farm, to build shelter, to live a simple life in harmony with the natural world. Just my 2cents
- TOMDEY, CharLakeAstro, DSOGabe and 5 others like this
#6
Posted 29 July 2024 - 11:17 AM
Post apocalyptic zombies may be an issue.
- Wimpy.mcpoat likes this
#7
Posted 29 July 2024 - 11:34 AM
- Wimpy.mcpoat likes this
#8
Posted 29 July 2024 - 11:53 AM
The only thing that will get me dark skies,is a nuclear blast,lol
The dinosaurs and thousands of other species did not survive the hundreds or thousands of years of "nuclear winter" that followed their apocalypse because the skies did not just suddenly clear of acid rain clouds and the rain of 'debris' that formed the KT boundary layer.
The only 'survivors' were small mammals that lived in underground burrows and species like alligators and crocs that live mostly underwater and deep mud. Maybe your telescope will be found by some distant future archeologist still clutched in your hands buried in your basement preserved in ash or mud from the Anthropocene Era. Be careful what you wish for.
Edited by Ron359, 29 July 2024 - 11:55 AM.
- CharLakeAstro, Freezout, Dynan and 2 others like this
#9
Posted 29 July 2024 - 12:10 PM
I'm kinda worried about bears where I live.
Even in Wyoming,everyone likes to leave lights on for safety purposes.
And don't forget the 60 mph winds on a regular basis.
- Dynan likes this
#10
Posted 29 July 2024 - 04:52 PM
I don't think it will take a nuke to put us back to the stone age. IMHO, the western "modern" world is already hanging on a fragile thread. Take away power, take away Walmart, and see how long it takes to fall to pieces. No, we are doomed by our own technology. After the fall the only ones left will be stone age peoples; aboriginal, tribal, people who have nothing by our standards. But they have what we don't; the knowledge to survive without the modern world. The ability to hunt, to farm, to build shelter, to live a simple life in harmony with the natural world. Just my 2cents
Just have the cell towers fail for an hour or two and half the population will bouncing off the walls or reaching for the security blanket.
- mountain monk, DSOGabe and Wimpy.mcpoat like this
#11
Posted 30 July 2024 - 04:27 PM
You're in Wyoming! Head just SE of Lander on a 'windless night', and be amazed. So many stars I couldn't find the constellations. (Good luck with the windy part.)
Windless night in Wyoming? I don't think so!
- Dynan and HopeStar7 like this
#12
Posted 09 August 2024 - 06:38 PM
The only thing that will get me dark skies,is a nuclear blast,lol
Long as i have A/C i am all for it.
#13
Posted 09 August 2024 - 09:24 PM
Never look at nuclear blasts with a telescope unless you have a proper nuclear blast filter and an old elementary school desk.....
- gene 4181, Freezout and TicoWiko like this
#14
Posted 12 August 2024 - 11:25 AM
Sure wish I had your light pollution problems.
We rode from the park down into Jackson. Even at 2300 the Tetons were illuminated from the west I'm assuming by the sunset. Most amazing night sky I've seen. We pulled off and just sat for a bit staring at the sky. Then my wife made the comment " Wonder if there are wolves or bears nearby?".. So we got back on the bike and headed on our way.
#15
Posted 13 August 2024 - 09:23 AM
The only thing that will get me dark skies,is a nuclear blast,lol
Many would be happy with such a thing as long as it more negatively impacts "other" people, of course!
#16
Posted 25 August 2024 - 09:17 PM
All it would take is a few well placed EMP generators and the grid goes down. You get your night skies back... but no electronic banking which most nations revolve around. No easy access food unless you do homegrown. No heat for the masses in winter. No respite from the summer heat that happens to be brutal in some areas. No water pumps. General mayhem ensues. But you probably won't have to wait for nukes or EMP, some actors from a rogue state, or financed by a rogue state, will eventually hack the grid and shut it down....all for the tidy sum of One Millioooooon dollars.
#17
Posted 04 September 2024 - 08:50 AM
Never look at nuclear blasts with a telescope unless you have a proper nuclear blast filter and an old elementary school desk.....
I read an article recently (online, possibly phys.org or Ars Technica) discussing the actual brightness of a nuclear blast. The usual trope of "brighter than a thousand Suns" is apparently wildly exaggerated. IIRC, It's more like 2 or 3 Suns (in visible light), at least for a "small" 15kT nuke. Two or three stacked solar filters could take care of that. Of course, there's the small matter of the rest of the EM spectrum (UV, X Ray, Gamma Ray) to deal with, not to mention those pesky neutrons!
While the power grid permanently going down would certainly be a boon to observers, I think the total collapse of society would outweigh the gains. I hope all the posts yearning for an apocalypse were firmly tongue-in-cheek! Even I wouldn't look forward to spending my time killing my neighbors in order to defend my small stockpile of canned goods. No time to observe! It wouldn't even have to be a man-made event -- anyone up for a large Carrington Event? We will find our modern technological society to be amazingly brittle.
#18
Posted 06 September 2024 - 09:37 PM
Just wait for the grid to fail in a decade or so and we'll find out. Have your telescope ready... one that does not rely on AC power or GPS. Tom
Manual telescope! Manual mount so mot dobs are safe.
- TOMDEY likes this
#19
Posted 07 September 2024 - 06:20 PM
Windless night in Wyoming? I don't think so!
Anything under 30 knots is considered windless in Wyoming! https://www.wyomingf...ft_windsock.htm
#20
Posted 08 September 2024 - 02:14 AM
Well this has certainly cheered me up this morning.
If some of you could even mention light pollution, it would make my life a lot easier!
#21
Posted 08 September 2024 - 05:07 PM
#22
Posted 08 September 2024 - 07:28 PM
#23
Posted 09 September 2024 - 09:39 AM
No because you wouldn't have time to practice astronomy. You would be using your telescope 24/7 to survey the landscape searching for scavengers, and preparing your defense.
Also, having no more access to Cloudy Nights could lower my astronomical knowledge. I would end up thinking that I'm the first discoverer of plenty of DSOs accessible to my 150mm telescope and would name them "Freezout 45, Freezout 46, Freezout 47..."