Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Help needed - I'm getting a reflection

Meade Equipment
  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 murray.collingwood

murray.collingwood

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2024

Posted 13 November 2024 - 09:44 PM

 Hi there, first time poster.

 

I have a Meade 395 and have been looking at the moon lately.

The image I'm looking at is okay, however it looks like a second reflection of the moon slightly offset from the real one I'm looking at.

I don't have any flash equipment so I can't take any photos or anything, so I googled for a similar image and it is attached so you get an idea of what I'm seeing.  REPEAT: the image attached is not my image, it's to give you the idea that I'm seeing the moon, but there is a faint reflection also visible.

 

1. I can see the moon quite clearly.

2. When I look to the to the top edge of the moon I can see a second outline of the moon edge as though in a reflection from a window (not a mirror).

3. I wondering if it was because I was behind our double glazed windows, so I took the telescope outside, but unfortunately I'm getting the same result without any windows.

 

Can this be fixed?

Is it my eyes?

Is it the telescope?

Is there actually a second ghostly moon behind the one we see?

 

Cheers

Murray

Attached Thumbnails

  • moon-faint-reflection.jpg

  • agaks likes this

#2 SeattleScott

SeattleScott

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 19,770
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2011

Posted 13 November 2024 - 10:01 PM

First of all, I have to ask, are you viewing the Moon through a double pane window?

If not, this sounds like ghosting . This is caused by the moon reflecting off your eyeball back onto the eyepiece. Better eyepieces with anti-reflection coatings can help with this some, but this is not unheard of, even with premium eyepieces.
  • gnowellsct, VMan, Jethro7 and 1 other like this

#3 oldphotonm

oldphotonm

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 117
  • Joined: 09 Jan 2018
  • Loc: New Mexico

Posted 13 November 2024 - 10:07 PM

Absolutely.

Prolly not.

Depends.

Oh heck no.

 

Are you using a camera of any kind or just your eyeball to capture the "image" you mention?

 

Do you wear glasses when observing?

 

When you say "top edge", how much of an offset? Is the ghost image slightly offset or grossly offset like the example image you posted?


  • michael8554 likes this

#4 michael8554

michael8554

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,952
  • Joined: 19 Aug 2020
  • Loc: Wiltshire UK

Posted 14 November 2024 - 04:25 AM

What OTA and eyepiece ?



#5 JOEinCO

JOEinCO

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,121
  • Joined: 28 Sep 2017
  • Loc: Colorado Front Range

Posted 14 November 2024 - 08:32 AM

I believe the Meade 395 comes with an erect-image prism diagonal. My guess is you are seeing reflections caused by that diagonal. 

 

Try looking at the Moon tonight with just the eyepiece in the focuser. Angle might be odd and a bit awkward with the Moon so high right now, but you just want to eliminate the diagonal as the source of the double Moon reflection.


  • David Castillo, sevenofnine, Sincos and 1 other like this

#6 Echolight

Echolight

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 16,014
  • Joined: 01 May 2020
  • Loc: Texas

Posted 14 November 2024 - 05:35 PM

Some binoculars with prisms will do this.

 

It's called a ghost image.

 

I've only seen it when viewing the Moon.


Edited by Echolight, 14 November 2024 - 05:36 PM.

  • HopeStar7 likes this

#7 triplemon

triplemon

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,336
  • Joined: 07 Nov 2023
  • Loc: Portland, OR

Posted 14 November 2024 - 06:46 PM

What type/brand of diagonal are you using ?

I've seen an uptick of ultra-cheap diagonals using second surface (aka bathroom) mirrors. They cause ghosts similar to that. One indication of that is the ghost image is just a bit out of focus compared to the main image. If you can focus sharply on either one but not both at the same time - that a is dead giveaway for this.

 

Poorly made image errect diagonals can also cause similar.

 

In either way - try to see if you can get to a fcous without the diagonal to check.


Edited by triplemon, 14 November 2024 - 06:53 PM.


#8 murray.collingwood

murray.collingwood

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2024

Posted 19 November 2024 - 11:39 PM

WOW!  Awesome to get so many replies.  Thanks everybody.

 

@SeattleScott initially we were looking through double glazed windows, which is why I took it outside, there was no improvement.  Reflection from my eyeball, not something I have noticed before when using other telescopes.  However, I did recently have cataract surgery and new lenses inserted (in my eyes).  Unfortunately this is not the solution as my wife who has normal eyes (whatever normal is) also sees the 'ghostly' image.

 

@oldphotonm No camera - just my eyes.  If I could get a photo of it I would post the actual photo.  I might try that tonight.  No glasses, however I've got new lenses in my eyes, however as mentioned to Michael, my wife with normal eyes sees the same thing.  The top edge, it's probably about 1/3 of the moon, same size.

 

@michael8554 OTA - no idea.  What would an OTA look like?  The eye piece, there seems to be two.  First in line is a Meade 2x telenegative followed by a Meade MA25mm.

 

@JOEinCO  I will try just the eye piece tonight and see what that looks like.  It could well be any piece of glass or reflection in the telescope.  I have no idea of the history - whether it was dropped at some time before I took possession.

 

@Echolight  I had another telescope in Australia and didn't see reflections like this.  Also, I'm getting a similar issue looking at stars, although the offset is much greater, and there are two reflections instead of one.  I'm hoping it's something simple that can be fixed.

 

@triplemon Would I have to disassemble the telescope to find this?  My guess is that it is the original that came with the telescope.  I have nothing to suggest that anything has changed from the original product, but maybe something has moved inside.  I will check in the focusing makes any changes to the ghost image tonight and let you know.

 

Is there a simple method of getting a photo of what I can see through the telescope.  At this point I'm thinking I will just stick my iphone camera over the eye piece and see if something appears that I can capture.  If you have any other suggestions I'm all ears.

 

Cheers

Murray



#9 SeattleScott

SeattleScott

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 19,770
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2011

Posted 20 November 2024 - 10:13 AM

If you are seeing multiples with stars, that’s concerning. My guess would be the diagonal. I don’t think the barlow and eyepiece alone could do this. Granted lack of anti-reflection coatings can contribute to ghosting, but this sounds more serious than the usual faint ghost image.
  • JOEinCO likes this

#10 SeattleScott

SeattleScott

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 19,770
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2011

Posted 20 November 2024 - 10:14 AM

OTA is optical tube assembly. Basically the telescope tube.

#11 oldphotonm

oldphotonm

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 117
  • Joined: 09 Jan 2018
  • Loc: New Mexico

Posted 20 November 2024 - 02:54 PM

Murray-

It sounds suspiciously like something is slightly wonky (out of alignment) with your objective lens or the focuser body, especially since you see double images of the stars and your sweetheart (with OEM eyeballs) sees the same thing.

From what I've read so far, the objective lens cannot be collimated (aligned) in its cell.

But what can be checked is if the objective cell is properly attached to the main tube and not cross-threaded or otherwise mis-aligned.

Same thing for the focuser body.

 

Do you have only the single MA25 eyepiece?

 

Another question: if you take the diagonal out and gently shake it, do you feel and/or hear a rattle? If so, that's likely your problem. Otherwise, what triplemon notes is also a likely suspect.

Also try the shake test with that 2x barlow (telenegative) lens. A loose element there could also cause the mis-alignment.

 

Finally, a most important question:

Do you belong to a local astronomy club where you live? If so, attend a club meeting and talk to some of the members and see if someone in the group can assist you.

Good-sized clubs have a wealth of knowledge in the "collective" membership and makes for a very good reason to join a club.



#12 murray.collingwood

murray.collingwood

    Lift Off

  • -----
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2024

Posted 06 December 2024 - 05:16 AM

Sorry it's been so long since my last post.  We've had weeks of cloudy nights.  Finally tonight we have some scattered cloud so I could try taking some photos.  I must say, taking photos with my iPhone looking at the lens is not easy.  Firstly I had to turn off the flash and the shutter delay, and then hold the camera very flat and still over the lens, using slight tilting adjustments, and sliding slowly left and right, up and down, until finally I had something to photograph.

 

So, my photo of the moon is pretty much what I'm seeing.

Screenshot 2024-12-06 at 10.47.08 PM.jpeg

 

I'm trying to locate my local astronomical group in case they have some techy guys who can help fix my telescope. 

There is one in Wellington (New Zealand), not too far away, but maybe there is a closer group.

 

Thanks for all your help and advice.

 

 



#13 JOEinCO

JOEinCO

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,121
  • Joined: 28 Sep 2017
  • Loc: Colorado Front Range

Posted 06 December 2024 - 08:41 AM

Try looking at the Moon tonight with just the eyepiece in the focuser....you want to eliminate the diagonal as the source of the double Moon reflection.

Sorry it's been so long since my last post.  We've had weeks of cloudy nights.  Finally tonight we have some scattered cloud so I could try....

 

What did it look like when you took the diagonal out of the optical train?



#14 WillR

WillR

    Soyuz

  • ****-
  • Posts: 3,682
  • Joined: 20 Mar 2021
  • Loc: Stroudsburg, PA

Posted 06 December 2024 - 09:11 AM

That is a strange photo and I don’t even see how it is possible. The top, superimposed photo shows the trio of craters Theophilus, Cyrillus, and Catharina backwards, at an odd angle and far too close to the limb. What was the date and time you took this photo?



#15 SeattleScott

SeattleScott

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 19,770
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2011

Posted 06 December 2024 - 09:39 AM

That is seriously messed up. No reason you should be seeing that other than looking through a double pane window, which sounds like it isn’t the case.

I don’t think any eyepiece could cause that, outside of being completely defective. You can try swapping eyepieces just to be sure though. The diagonal is probably the most likely culprit, especially if it is a prism. So yeah try swapping eyepieces, try without the diagonal. If neither works, the scope is junk. Most likely replacing the diagonal with a 90 degree mirror diagonal will fix it.

#16 triplemon

triplemon

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,336
  • Joined: 07 Nov 2023
  • Loc: Portland, OR

Posted 07 December 2024 - 04:31 PM

That is a strange photo and I don’t even see how it is possible. The top, superimposed photo shows the trio of craters Theophilus, Cyrillus, and Catharina backwards, at an odd angle and far too close to the limb. What was the date and time you took this photo?

No worries - this is the middle image superimposed on the upper reflection. And being sidewys it means he is using a plain mirror or prism diagonal, so its not a bad amici roof prism causing this.

 

And the 2nd ghost just below might not be a ghost image at all - but rather the fieldstop or other vignetting due to camera positioning. As it shows no terminator at all. But looking very closely at the right-top curvature of the dark shadow vs the moons shape it could also mean - the bright center image may not even follow the field stop. Which could hint at a tilted or fractured lense in the eyepiece.

Do you have another eyepiece ?

If you look at the eyepiece (or telescope objective or the diagonal mirror) in daylight under a bright light, do any of those appear broken into pieces ?


Edited by triplemon, 07 December 2024 - 04:39 PM.


#17 gnowellsct

gnowellsct

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 25,808
  • Joined: 24 Jun 2009

Posted 14 December 2024 - 11:54 PM

That is a strange photo and I don’t even see how it is possible. The top, superimposed photo shows the trio of craters Theophilus, Cyrillus, and Catharina backwards, at an odd angle and far too close to the limb. What was the date and time you took this photo?


That's the way I see the moon when I take my glasses off!

#18 michael8554

michael8554

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,952
  • Joined: 19 Aug 2020
  • Loc: Wiltshire UK

Posted 15 December 2024 - 05:32 AM

Some camera phones go to a multi-exposure mode for night shots.

 

But the first wide-angle moon shot looks like a reflection.




CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Meade, Equipment



Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics