Your Apertura is a GSO product, GSO makes a nice coma Corrector that is sold under several labels, typically around $135 new. If you can make all your eyepieces parfocal (one reason to stay in a singular eyepiece family), then you'll be able to use just a single spacer with the corrector, probably another $25. If you can't or decide not to make the eyepieces parfocal, then a tunable-top corrector like the TeleVue Parracor 2 would be easier to use. The P2 is considerably more expensive than the GSO. Depending on how close you get the spacing right on the GSO, the view will be well corrected to almost the very edge (the P2 is considered the best here on this forum). Buy used if you can.
At f/5, I would use the scope as-is without a corrector and see if coma distracts you, let your eyes be the judge. If you are someone that critically observes an object all the way to the edge of the field, then yeah, you are probably going to appreciate a corrector. Some folks seem to be more concerned with judging eyepieces than they are with just observing what's up in our beautiful universe. If you are observing in enough light pollution, I think it'll be a meh purchase. Using David Lorenz's map:
https://djlorenz.git...erlay/dark.html
My home residence has a brightness rating of 18.79 mag/arcsec2, for me, it's a waste of money at this brightness. At my other address, the brightness rating is 21.72 mag/arcsec2, and I can easily see the coma, though it doesn't distract me or make my time at the eye piece any less enjoyable. The darker skies are where the corrector can really show it's value, though many folks still go without one.