Well I experienced a hardware failure tonight. Computer wouldn't connect to the mount. I wasn't about to sit out manually nudging the scope all night so the Io and GRS transits I was going to shoot were right out. So I just shot a couple of videos. Seeing was slated to be poor. The preview was stable but without fine detail. So I made a quick informal study by shooting one video on the Con plan at 1/30s and the other at 6.25ms. That's a factor of 5.3 difference between the two. Here are the two images.
I think the 6.25ms image is marginally better for 5.3 times as much data, although interestingly there do appear to be some areas that appear sharper in the 33.3ms image.